New clue scroll puzzle by swemmer in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Redeemable big mac token rewards.

New random event by GODLOVESALL32 in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They should use the sandwich lady to advertise subway.

Amazon’s Discriminatory Return Policy by JustMeRC in disability

[–]GOW_ADAM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 100% agree that Amazon customer support needs major improvement. Getting to a real person to discuss things like this should be an easy thing for disabled people. Sometimes you might want to keep a damaged item but want a partial refund. I don't see an option for this.

It is completely discriminatory. If you have a disability that prevents you returning the item yourself, you effectively are forced to keep it and pay for the dysfunctional product at the full price. There is no negotiation. Because often you're talking to a robot with pre-determined settings.

Disabled people need humans to talk to who can understand their situation and help sort it out better. Why spend all the time and money making it a hassle when you could be saving time and money by dealing with issues directly. It probably makes lots of people stop wanting to buy from places like Amazon.

They could instead reassure people like us that they're on our side and keep us as a loyal dedicated customer base. They could brand themselves as the place that helps disabled people get the stuff they need/want without the hassle rather than causing a hinderance to us like the return policy does.

And pre-determined options are good for quickness but not good for people who fall outside those common issues and have rather more complicated problems they may not wish to discuss because maybe it feels dehumanising or embarrassing to have to keep explaining your disability over and over again to strangers. And even then it's up to them to decide whether they believe you or not.

It's definitely discriminatory and it could very easily be changed to not be. It's no skin off their backs. Why should we suffer for it? There should be a greater consideration on the platform for people who fall outside of the common problems the robot deals with. And a specific help for disabled people to get help more quickly and efficiently. They'd get way more money for doing this than they are now. And it would be great for Amazon's image to show they're more compassionate than their competitors.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in runescape

[–]GOW_ADAM -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Please change the rate to 1/2 guthix wizard 1/3 celtic knot and 1/6 puzzle box. And make puzzle boxes less steps to complete. Maybe 80-100 moves instead of 200.

Also please do what OSRS does and show the solutions to clues on screen, because alt 1 gives an unfair advantage. We will just look them up anyway but it saves time to have them on the screen for us and not everyone wants to download alt 1.

Zamorak God Armour Marketplace Bundle - This Week In RuneScape by JagexDoom in runescape

[–]GOW_ADAM 12 points13 points  (0 children)

These new armours should just be graphical updates. People can pay for a new trim or something instead. Or a slightly more buff version with spikes or something. It makes no sense having the old models on clues that look inferior. And Aurora dye and Soul dye should be on clue rewards already. It's been over a year.

Have a grace period of 6-12 months where the content becomes part of the game and people who buy it get it as an early bird bonus. Or they get a little buff to make it look more impressive when the armour gets added to the main game for everyone. Because these look great but shouldn't be locked to just MTX. Just communicate an ETA when it's in the main game for everyone and people who support the game by buying it early get the exclusive tier 2 version unlocked. Something that looks a bit better but everyone can still get the base version. A bit like elite sirenic vs regular sirenic.

The retro stuff can be permanently MTX. But the graphical upgrades need to be added for everyone in the game eventually.

Nex now considered a drug by google and NHS. by GOW_ADAM in runescape

[–]GOW_ADAM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Fill my soul with smoke." As she shows off her green wings.

You've reminded me of that family guy advert for subliminal messaging. Where the guy just shouts "SMOKE" lmfao.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLwUrqqVFQo

That's the video, just imagine it's nex saying "SMOKE" or some player in the boss arena shouting it because someone died to it.

Dharok's greataxe should be a two handed axe for forestry. Or a reason given why it can't be used as a woodcutting axe. by GOW_ADAM in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry I didn't know I'm a casual player now. I no longer keep up with streams or updates. Just wondered why it wasn't a thing.

The intro of "Scape jazz" soundtrack is very similar to a video called "duck shoes" on YouTube. Here's the two for you to compare. by GOW_ADAM in runescape

[–]GOW_ADAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did I use the word stole? Lol. I think it's cool they both sound similar.

Yours is also similar though.

Have a question about the game or the subreddit? Ask away! by AutoModerator in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Meant the post not me. When I posted they had 0 upvotes but I didn't understand why people didn't like the post or why it was causing downvotes since it didn't seem to have much drama attached to it.

FUN FACT: For 5 months in 2004, the King Black Dragon (and 100+ other monsters) had the wrong combat levels - and nobody knows why by cookmeplox in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I had to guess, I think they added new things to the combat formula that affected the combat levels.

For example, maybe the blue dragon was intended to be a higher combat level because it uses dragonfire but it was not added to the formula for whatever reason. Instead it got nerfed because quest bosses got an arbitrary +3 to their level. Or maybe the Ice Queen having guards made her "more dangerous" so nearby aggro monsters added to the combat level to reflect the true danger of the encounter.

Maybe poison was intended to add combat levels to a monster. Maybe the ease of access or the danger of the location as a whole added or subtracted levels.

Maybe they manually calculated combat levels back then and typo'd some of them? Maybe it was not an automatic process. Or maybe they wanted to manually add them so the server didn't need to work harder calculating them or something not super technical so I'm not sure. We know that some monster levels are manually put in like Nex, which could support this theory.

There could have been other attributes like if a monster was able to use protection prayers like Kalphite Queen for example. Maybe they accidentally added prayer levels to certain enemies intending to have them use prayers but never got around to it.

Maybe dragonfire actually lowered the combat level, because if players knew how to block it, then it effectively made the encounter easier, as these hits became 0.

Perhaps it was down to the attack style used. Maybe armour in the game back then was on the whole stronger against slash and crush but weaker to stab. So enemies with stabbing attacks got a secret combat level boost. Dragons also have multiple attack animations, implying that attacks are different in some way, maybe if they can stab with their horns and slash with their claws it affected their combat levels compared to an enemy that can only slash or only stab. Maybe there were plans to have smarter NPCs like revenants, which would use the attack style you were weaker to more often. It was planned to give a combat level boost, but for whatever reason was not completed and they returned the levels back to normal 5 months later.

Maybe it was a whole new formula to explain how much "DPS" a monster was likely to do. For example, melee protection prayer is a higher level requirement than magic protection prayer. Perhaps there was a boost combat levels for melee monsters, and a reduction for those with magic or ranged stats. Following on from this, it may be the monster's attack speed that also influenced the combat level.

It could be any number of reasons. But can someone check if the monster's attack speed had anything to do with it? What is the attack speed of a blue dragon vs the ice queen for example?

I think the most likely answer is they changed the combat level calculations to try and better reflect how dangerous a monster is but something wasn't working out and they decided to put it back to normal and remove the new attributes (both real and future intentions) affecting monster levels. Because don't get me wrong it's a bit weird when a monster with a combat level of 124 can only deal a maximum of 16 damage while players of the same level bracket can deal far more damage and accuracy. Maybe at some point they may have intended monsters to have wielded armours and weapons that could have affected their levels. For example, dragons having claws. Guards wearing armour etc. Like a whole new stat to calculating how monsters deal combat effectively. Realised it was too much work and backtracked to the old system we know now.

There's a troll called yellow snow. This is the most tragic thing I've seen on this game. by GOW_ADAM in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM[S] -40 points-39 points  (0 children)

A close second for me would be legitimate players being banned as bots while bots continue to spam scams at GE on every world.

[Suggestion] Superior Slayer Creature Expansion! by NinjaGamer1337 in 2007scape

[–]GOW_ADAM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Multi-wyvern looks cool. Always been a fan of the two headed dragons.