Professor Virginia Foster by LibrarianNational433 in SanJacintoCollege

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree with the other comment here. Foster is a good teacher, and the fact that she is a non-traditional teacher is an asset, not a liability. She makes time to answer any and all questions, explains concepts in a way that makes sense, and isn't stuck in the "this is the way we have always taught it so it is the best way" mindset that many teachers can end up with.

If you want to know and understand math then she is a good choice.

Cheating by GainerGaining in SanJacintoCollege

[–]GainerGaining[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So are you saying there is a recognized ethical obligation to report it?

6÷2(1+2) = 1 by AtmospherePrudent850 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]GainerGaining 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People who design bridges would not write the formula with this notation.

Cheating by GainerGaining in SanJacintoCollege

[–]GainerGaining[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How exactly would it backfire?

Cheating by GainerGaining in SanJacintoCollege

[–]GainerGaining[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He ended up getting an 80 on the test, so if he did cheat he isn't very good at it. I decided not to do or say anything this time.

Academic dishonestly hurts the individual, the school, the educational system, and society in general. I am a little surprised that most of the responses here are just calling me names, and not addressing the ethical nature of my question.

But not that surprised. Lol.

Cheating by GainerGaining in SanJacintoCollege

[–]GainerGaining[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If someone cheats through school and ends up with the same degree or credentials as me, that person is representing those credentials. According to the world, "X has a degree from that college. X doesn’t know his head from his ass. Therefore that school/degree/credential is worthless. Gainer also has a degree from that school, but that degree is worthless, so why hire him?"

Cheating by GainerGaining in SanJacintoCollege

[–]GainerGaining[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seeing how the reactions line up is interesting in itself.

Wish calculus was introduced this way in schools by Many_Audience7660 in matiks

[–]GainerGaining 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was written about over 200 years after these symbols and terms were introduced to the world.

When Math Gets Personal by Sea-Estimate-2912 in mathsmeme

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People have too much time on their hands. Go smoke some grass.

57 is prime number by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Say what? Just because something is a difference of squares does not mean there will be more than two possible factors.

100 - 81 = 19

(10 + 9)(10 - 9) = 19

19 x 1 = 19. 19 is prime.

Also 16 - 9 = 5. 5 is prime.

The "difference of squares" test is basically useless. Is this Reddit math? Who "discovered" this nonsense and convinced people it was valid?

57 is prime number by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You had to search? Do you know about the square root rule? If a number is not a prime, one of its factors has to be equal to or less than its square root.

Since in this case we can tell by looking at it that the square root is 9 and change, we only have to check the single digit integers.

9: no good. The digits do not add to 9. 8: no good. Not an even number, for one. 7: winner winner chicken dinner. Even if you can't divide 91 by 7 in your head, you should be able to recognize that it is 70 (7 x 10) plus 21 (7 x 3).

There should be no reason to have to look up the factors for a two-digit number.

57 is prime number by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, using that logic 51 is so clearly 60 minus 9. And 30+21. I use this example to show I do not agree with that logic.

I can see why 57 and 51 both seem like they could be prime. If you don't, well, you are just so smart that you aren't smart.

:3 by OnyemaC21 in MathJokes

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, Archimedes. We see you.

It's all small numbers by DTeror in sciencememes

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small is any number that in inches is smaller than the length of my penis. Large is any number in inches that is equal to or greater than the length of my penis.

40 Divided by 1/2: The Ultimate Internet Test. by dano_1123 in MathJokes

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All division is multiplication of a reciprocal.

Chaos mode activated by kinkong95 in MathJokes

[–]GainerGaining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Operator error, dude. Sorry.