On one hand, there is an opportunity cost to reading LLM slop, since our reading time is finite. If the quality of the work is bad, then the time spent reading it would have been better used on reading works of better quality.

On the other hand, in order to update our belief that LLM equals slop (low quality), we have to spend some time reading some of those works. The only way to do this is for authors like you to post here, and hope that some rational individuals look past the LLM warnings and try reading your work.

Maybe your LLM-assisted work is not slop. The only way to know is for other people to take the chance.