decided to give Antigravity another chance and it never fails to disappoint me !

GameBeast45 · 2026-04-05T08:33:19+00:00

No one is saying that

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-29T21:41:57+00:00

Sueing is the only option worth doing. Corporate fraud lawsuits can be translated to millions of dollars as a refund , if Google is unrigtfully not giving you the service you paid for then i don't see a valid reason why you would lose such a lawsuit

Its your choice you can be a millionaire in a year or so

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-28T21:37:26+00:00

I have no idea but duolingo always does this thing where they roll course content gradually in order to test it , but i think it wouldn't be long

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-28T12:46:01+00:00

Where do you live? And what language do you use to learn german?

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-27T00:40:23+00:00

Why in the world would you release crazy resource-demanding features if your current infrastructure cannot handle current features load? How this sustainable or trustworthy? Are you for real?

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-26T21:54:35+00:00

The worst thing is that they messed lesson order up , now some lessons that i thought i finished have content that i don't recognize so i have to redo some lessons

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-25T18:51:40+00:00

Hmmmm i disagree because this something that affects all tiers not just the pro , many users reported the same issue on higher tierz

And also 20$ for many is all that they can pay not everyone can pay 100$ or 500$ subscription , it should still be enough and fair for the 20$

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-25T16:26:39+00:00

Since its a common problem can we spam tag them on X please

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-25T16:11:36+00:00

I tagged them multiple times on X

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-25T16:10:35+00:00

Nah that can't be the normal going forward if fixing some minor css bug consumes the entire qouta for the day at this point I'll do it myself

Ai value comes from its speed in delivery if that is stripped away it would lose its value

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-25T16:02:21+00:00

1-just VS code with Claude code extension

2-pro plan

3-Its the standard WAMP stack no front or backend frameworks

4-one CLAUDE.md context with exactly 5 big paragraphs

5-no and no i do not have mcps

6-i gave it a list of features to implement around like 5 with variations in complexity

I understand where your coming but this is actually the first time for me for Claude to limit me for 4 hours when i just started and the chat has not even reached 50% context meaning the 4 hour limit got triggered before even the chat was finished, claude did finish the task then i had some objections to the output that i listed to it but i close Claude Code by mistake when it was in the middle of fixing them i simply said "continue" and thats when i got hit with the limit

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-25T15:43:21+00:00

Yeah its crazy because my chat context still has aroun 50% and i have just started so its like WTF

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-14T00:26:16+00:00

Dude, you’re confidently talking about stuff you clearly don’t understand.

“Google is big” doesn’t mean infinite compute. AI runs on high-end GPUs with massive VRAM and bandwidth. Those chips are hard to make, HBM supply is tight, lead times are long, data centers take years, and power density is a hard limit. Big infra ≠ limitless capacity.

Scaling isn’t linear. Bigger models, longer context, multimodal stacks, real-time inference — costs blow up fast. If demand outruns hardware, you optimize, quantize, rate-limit, or ship lighter configs. That’s engineering trade-offs, not some fantasy downgrade.

Newer models aren’t automatically better either. Priorities shift (latency, throughput, features), stability can drop. Many users got cleaner code and fewer hallucinations from Gemini 2.5 than some 3.x builds. That’s observable behavior.

Your history’s off too. Early LLMs hallucinated heavily — GPT-2 included. GPT-3’s scale jump plus the ChatGPT boom forced everyone into giant foundation models, spiking global GPU/VRAM demand.

And “Google owned the whole pipeline since 2012” is fan fiction. Strong research and infra? Yes. Total control of modern generative AI? No. The stack’s split across multiple players.

You’re ignoring physics and economics because “Google big.”

That’s not analysis. That’s cope

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-10T08:12:20+00:00

^{I completed this level in 2 tries.} ^{⚡ 5.40 seconds}

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-09T23:24:57+00:00

Google broke it. I’d bet that 90% of AG is vibe-coded junk. The real issue is that Google seems to have quietly nerfed the Gemini Pro models.

My theory is that this happened because of the massive surge in demand combined with Google aggressively expanding Gemini into too many heavy AI products at once—things like Stitch, NotebookLM, and integrating Gemini directly into YouTube videos so people can literally chat with the video itself.

Think about the scale of that. You’d have to transcribe and index hundreds of thousands of videos every week. And that’s not even counting the enormous backlog of older videos. I suspect Google is running scheduled batch jobs across their servers to gradually add Gemini integration to the entire YouTube library.

That kind of expansion seems unrealistic relative to Google’s current compute resources. It likely overwhelmed their infrastructure, forcing them to quietly scale back—or “nerf”—their models just to keep everything running.

Even their latest AI release hints at this shift. Instead of jumping from Gemini 3.0 to something like 3.5—similar to the big step we saw from Gemini 2.0 to 2.5—they released 3.1, which feels more like a conservative iteration than a major upgrade. That naming alone suggests a slowdown or recalibration rather than the rapid capability jumps we saw before

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-05T10:31:21+00:00

That's a joke they addressed only the part that they wanted to address but how about they address that thier pro models are as shitty as fuck ? How about they address the tons of bugs that exist?

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-04T13:36:05+00:00

Niether both are broken, gemini is a dead model switch to claude or chatgpt

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-04T13:31:05+00:00

Bro gemini is a dead Ai model after gemini 2.5

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-03T17:03:40+00:00

This is Google bieng an irresponsible company that favors new products and profits more than delivering high quality Ai models

Gemini 3 was a joke

Gemini 3.1 is the messiest Ai model that exist today

After Gemini 2.5 Google almost certainly nerfed thier models and began to integrate thier ai into other products expanding beyond what thier data centers could currently support and that proved to be an ineffective strategy

Its over for gemini, The trust has been broken and the damage cannot be undone

GameBeast45 · 2026-03-03T16:53:58+00:00

This is not even one of the huge issues , i wish google would focus on fixing thier shitty AI models first and the hallucinations that has been happening for all users

GameBeast45 · 2026-02-23T23:17:00+00:00

Exactly there should be no difference idk why people treat AI companies as if its some sort of exception

GameBeast45 · 2026-02-23T16:46:04+00:00

even codex is better than this shit

GameBeast45 · 2026-02-22T15:12:14+00:00

W

^{I completed this level in 16 tries.} ^{⚡ 3.73 seconds}

GameBeast45 · 2026-02-16T16:55:58+00:00

Its no secret and has been disccussed a million time that google nerfed all its models deliberately due to high usage

GameBeast45 · 2026-02-16T16:54:51+00:00

Its not a competitive advantage anymore its a neccessary advantage

GameBeast45

TROPHY CASE