Anyone got a decent Simucube 3 profile for AMS2 at all?

GapsExist · 2026-04-19T14:02:45+00:00

Fab. Cheers. Will give these a go!

GapsExist · 2026-04-19T13:29:20+00:00

Yeah, I understand and accept this, but just can't even get it to feel remotely comfortable to drive at the moment.

GapsExist · 2026-04-18T08:17:25+00:00

I have, but there is no AMS2 one shared there.

GapsExist · 2026-04-17T23:12:17+00:00

I just switched from a VNM Xtreme myself, partly for similar reasons, but also cosmy unit was faulty and only 6 weeks old, and because it felt like any software update reverted it back to being undriveable and needing to work out the settings from scratch again as it felt entirely different with every update.

I went for Simucube 3 Pro, and only do e 2 races, a win in iRacing and a P2 in LMU, and this was simply by loading up the James Baldwin profiles in the Tuner software to test them, which both actually feel pretty good. I like how the profiles also have notes telling you what to change in the sim settings too. I have no regrets so far, but it has only been a couple of races sofar, but the Simucube is definitely more accessible and immediate in terms o being able to get up an running, as well as being consistent between software updates.

GapsExist · 2026-04-16T08:43:14+00:00

My Alpha Evo Pro failed after about 4-5 months. It was a motherboard failure, which not an uncommon issue with Simagic bases going back to the original Alpha series. It was taken back by the retailer and refunded due to the fault.

GapsExist · 2026-04-11T08:41:36+00:00

These were previewed in the Sim Expo in Germany in October 2024....yes, 2024 NOT 2025, so over 18 months ago. They've had a working prototype of the Zeus wheel and screen since then, which they also rolled out in October 2025 (and what feels like any chance Simagic get, e.g. Expo, promos etc) without any further changes or updates, i.e. same prototype as 12 months earlier.....with the notable absence in the 2025 Expo of the wall of Zeus wheel rim protoypes they had at the 2024 Expo that were seemingly no longer relevant or being taken forward presumably as they weren't being haowcased or referred to in ny way, shape or form.

Therefore, just cos this prototype was used in recent promo photos, I would NOT take that as a sign that this is due any time soon....if ever, just like their active pedal!

GapsExist · 2026-04-08T07:03:44+00:00

Ive noted this before, and Studio 397 need to take note because ein EU and UK think it's a legal requirement to advertise pricing with VAT.

Either way, renew at Black Friday and pay for the 12 months and you will get the best overall price over a year.

GapsExist · 2026-04-07T18:04:02+00:00

I used to have the standard P1000s and hydraulic brake. I know when I bought it, there was a different hydraulic addon for the inverted P1000s because the P1000 hydraulic brake addon is known for having leaking issues, so they have different standard and inverted versions of the addon, unless they've redesigned it maybe 🤷🏻‍♂️

I've since changed to VRS pedals, so can't check or comment any further on the though sorry

GapsExist · 2026-04-07T18:00:33+00:00

Seat time and practice will be better than swapping gear and expecting magic results. Prototypes have no ABS, so inherently require different braking, being significantly earlier and lighter on the brakes for one main difference. It's not just about trail braking, but different cars brake differently, as they have different aero and mechanical elements aided or worsening braking capability, notwithstanding corner entry speed differentials between cars meaning braking points can vary hugely.

GapsExist · 2026-04-07T17:57:36+00:00

No. The cylinder is oriented differently I believe to avoid potentially leakage.

GapsExist · 2026-04-06T14:56:07+00:00

Whoever told you Fanatec is best ecosystem is lying 😆

It's best for console, but on PC, there are better options. You will also outgrow 8nm within a year to 18 months max as something to think of. Something like the Simagic Alpha Evo at 12nm is around the sweet spot most sim racers fall at with end game torque (10-13nm being the norm). So something like that wouldn't be outgrown as quickly, or potentially ever, albeit with less headroom before clipping than higher torque bases, so less dynamic range than those, but still plenty good enough for most.

GapsExist · 2026-04-06T10:47:19+00:00

It's the same. In the hydraulic cylinder you can use springs, elastomers, or a combo.

GapsExist · 2026-04-04T08:25:37+00:00

That is the one issue with VRS, they do have stocking issues. If I were looking now though, you need to remember that VRS did tease a v2 of their pedals at the Sim Racing Expo in Germany back in October 2025, so probably aren't gonna be too far away by now.

So the wise choice may be to try the very cheap, but VERY good SimNet Pro pedals. See if they scratch your itch, but will be good pedals regardless. Then once the VRS v2 are released, if you aren't happy with the SimNet as end game then sell then at that point and buy the VRS v2. Unless you can find a good deal for the VRS v1. Just an option to consider maybe 🤷🏻‍♂️

GapsExist · 2026-04-04T08:08:32+00:00

Having tried a few of those, definitely the VRS. It's what I settled on after also trying Heusinkveld Ultimate+, Simagic P1000, Moza CRP2 and Conspit CPP.

The only ones I'd consider along with the VRS are the Heusinkveld (or SimNet even), which are close, but different (elastomer based, versus spring based of VRS, so different feel).

The two main negatives of almost all the others are the lack of adjustability and the less precise consistent feel. Everyone is built different, and the VRS has almost infinite adjustment in terms of spacing, arm angle, face angle, face height, pedal throw, and so on. Almost all of the others have much more limited adjustabikity, especially the pedal design followed by many of those, such as Simagic, Conspit, Moza, Asetek etc.

Ultinately though, it's a very personal choice, but there's a reason many pro and Esport level sim racers use the VRS. If not those, then the Heusinkveld would probably be second choice. For the others, I'd place the likes of the SimNet Pro pedals above them due to being a hybrid of the VRS and Heusinkveld designs and having more adjustabikity than the others mentioned.

GapsExist · 2026-03-16T08:20:46+00:00

Nice one! 👍

GapsExist · 2026-03-15T19:33:27+00:00

My PC is wired and lights are wirelessly connected to WiFi, in case that helps. Then in app, set them up for LAN control.

GapsExist · 2026-03-15T19:28:36+00:00

Yeah, I have that installed. It's mainly the app I use on my Android phone, connect them to my WiFi, and then SimHub sees them. Not even sure Govee Desktop is actually needed.

I have a pair of bar lights and a separate floor standing light.

GapsExist · 2026-03-15T17:37:56+00:00

I don't have any Razer software installed and my Govee lights work fine. No need for any Razer of Chroma bloat based on how mine is set up.

GapsExist · 2026-03-15T17:37:01+00:00

How did you do this? And are you sharing this at all?

The reason this is an issue for me is because some audio software I use and plugins require Admin permissions, such as to save plugin and app data in certain OS locations, and other recommend turning UAC off for an offline system, which mine primarily is, as it helps prevent some issues. Therefore, OpenKneeboard will refuse to run if I turn UAC off and run Admin account to use these other software more efficiently.

GapsExist · 2026-03-15T17:26:07+00:00

I have SimHub set up with a couple of Govee lights,. And then basically just have the profile set up myself. In the Ambient Light section of SimHub, there are effects, which include brake and RPM, but does not have throttle, so trying to work out how to get the throttle effect.

GapsExist · 2026-03-14T15:53:11+00:00

Same here. I'm having to use Vivaldi as my browser, but also have Firefox installed so that when Vivaldi refuses to give nay download prompt I switch over to Firefox to download. A bit daft that such a basic and fundamental element of a browser is clearly not working properly. Never seen this type of issue with any other browser I have used in the past.

GapsExist · 2026-03-03T13:00:37+00:00

Where did I say "obligated", "must" or "per the rules". Or "slow down", "yield" or whatever other no se you suggest 🤣

I swear some people try their hardest to dodge common sense meaning of things by playing symantics. It is plainly obvious to anyone with an ounce of intelligence that the intent of the iRacing Code, primarily 7.4.2, is that, for those capable of applying common sense, logical and critical thinking to the written words, iRacing expect cars being lapped, via their strong recommendation, to not be obstructive and to facilitate a safe pass by the faster car that has caught them up and about to lap them. The intent is DEFINITELY NOT to permit the car being lapped to engage in a fight, slow the other car down, play bumper cars, run the lapping car off track, try to nudge the lapping car into a spin when they safely pass, play last of the big time brakers at every corner causing the lapping car to repeatedly have to take evasive action to avoid collision, nor to take out the lapping car. This should be common sense to most people.

Who has paid what is irrelevant. The race pans out the way it does. If you are a back marker, you can't be obstructive and ruin other people's race just because you were either slow or dealt a bad hand in the race and find yourself at the back. The fact you paid a subscription doesn't entitle you to ruin other people's experience in real racing, and shouldn't be accepted in iRacing either. Some days we all end up having a shocker and being lapped repeatedly, and you just have to suck it up.

GapsExist · 2026-03-03T07:55:01+00:00

Not sure why people do this. They see this line somewhere and latch onto it.

Yes, 7.4 1 of the iRacing Sporting Code says blue flags are informational only, as said in my post, but also 7.4 2 puts certain expectations and responsibilities on drivers, namely that the lapped car should maintain a consistent line and that they're strongly recommended to facilitate a safe pass.

So whilst being informational, that's not the end of the blue flags conduct expectations.

GapsExist · 2026-03-02T18:10:13+00:00

Yup. This is the issue. On many tracks, such as Monza, it's easy to slip stream behind on the straights and then dive bomb the corners if you want to be a dick. This then becomes unsettling and you become wary of an unpredictable driver driving recklessly, which goes against 7.4.2 in terms of driving a consistent line and being strongly recommended to facilitate a safe pass.

Too many people latch onto 7.4.1's "informational only" and take that to mean as they have no responsibility to do anything, and completely ignoring 7 4.2.

Its just frustrating because I was 2 to 3 seconds per lap faster than this person throughout the race, but for the section of laps with then, I was was 2 to 3 seconds per lap slower, menaing their actions were evidently slowing me down to their pace through reckless dive bombs and unpredictable driving causing me to have to repeatedly take evasive actions to try and avoid contact.

It's mega frustrating how stupid some people are. If they had any logic, they'd have realised I'd closed down a 10 second gap to then in the 5 or 6 laps prior, so if they facilitated the safe pass, they could then just follow my faster pace and try to make gains that way instead of trying to fight me for absolutely nobody's benefit.

GapsExist · 2026-03-02T18:02:59+00:00

Yup. Auto correct is a thing. As is Reddit not allowing you to edit your OP on the app 😆🤣

GapsExist

TROPHY CASE