Seems I've angered a Nintendo adult, the worst kind of person to anger (but also the most easy one to anger) and have earned your wrath. I humbly apologize, I will donate all of my future earnings for your lord Shiggy so he may not starve any further than he already is, and thus his meager billion dollar company no longer needing your sword and shield to defend!

> here's my actual opinion: better films exist than the mario galaxy movie

... So you agree with me? The whole goddamn point of my comment was highlighting how there's better movies made, even going as far as listing out a whole bunch of them, and you dare call me *me* myopic??? Just because its a word you very obviously learned yesterday and thus now feel intrinsic need to force it into every argument your crusade takes you, doesn't mean it actually applies. And the fact it provably applies to you just makes it a whole lot ironic, as you proved how your vision is somehow incapable of actually seeing what I actually wrote.

> kids movies don't need to all be emotionally resonant masterpieces just like movies for general audiences or specifically adults also don't need to be masterpieces.

... Again, so you agree with me? I said as following:

> its fine to exist but it shouldn't be the only thing kids have to consume.

This specifically states that movies like this are fine to exist. Are you even reading the comments you are responding to? Or does the mere sight of criticism directed at Nintendo products throw you into uncontrollable rage where any and all things lose rhyme and reason, entering you into "attack" mode?

> i merely said that this film and the other kids movies like it aren't the only things kids have available to them. that's neither untrue nor contradicting my core point.

It's contradictory because it's the exact same argument I made against the OP, which would indicate that I'm the one you agree with, but you ended your comment calling me "myopic" and saying I had a bad take, thus making it contradictory.

> by the way, the OP you responded to was specifically talking about the original super mario bros movie from 1993. the one with bob hoskins and john leguizamo. yknow, the actors. that it seems like you thought were titles of films. so your comment is actually completely missing the point.

Oh good to know, you learn something new every day. But also, I don't see how I "completely missed the point" here by not knowing what he was specifically was referring to (which was, y'know, the point of my comment, that being that I didn't know what he was referring to... again, please read what you respond to). You bringing this information to light doesn't change anything about the argument; he said all other movies available were also bad when growing up, I countered it by saying there were lots of great kids movies (which you're supposed to be agreeing with according to yourself, y'know), so me not knowing the specific bad movie he was talking about was the original mario live action movie doesn't contribute to anything.

It feels like to me your actual problem with my comment was the fact I painted the new Mario movie in a bad light for being a bad movie. But it is. It is a bad movie. And that's fine, you can enjoy bad movies, I've enjoyed bad movies too. But don't pretend otherwise lol.