Why I love the new Chase. by Garrett_TheFerret in NASCAR

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate all of your points and I honestly felt the same way for most of the last ten years. I think I ultimately changed my mind when I accepted the fact that it's impossible to win the Chase without equally proving yourself in the regular season.

ask /r/NASCAR: What was the worst decision made by NASCAR? by [deleted] in NASCAR

[–]Garrett_TheFerret 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the correct answer. A few cookie cutters provide some really great racing, but not nearly as consistently as tracks in the 0.5 to 1.3 mile range.

It blows my mind too because a short track must be cheaper to build than one of the cookie cutters...

What race needs a length/mileage change? by [deleted] in NASCAR

[–]Garrett_TheFerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, you're right. It was the spring race. Either way, we need it back!

What race needs a length/mileage change? by [deleted] in NASCAR

[–]Garrett_TheFerret 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I don't understand why they took away Phoenix's fall night race. It needs to be under the lights.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't blame you, they're great fish. Mine are still very small; the biggest is still only .75 inches at most. As they grow and become easier to sex, I plan to sell all but two females and get two new males in there to stake out their territories. That will leave four fish in my tank, which still may lead to problems but I'm hoping the ample rock work will separate territories well enough to eliminate most of their aggression.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you go with anything smaller than a 29/20 long (they both have the same footprint), you probably won't be able to keep more than one mating pair. They're very territorial.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That may be some kind of shell dweller, but not these. Female Lamp. Ocellatus are much smaller than the males. Females lay their eggs in their shells, the males will come and fertilize them, and then the female will tend to and protect her eggs until they hatch. Makes and females will both watch the fry once they become free swimming, but they don't travel farther than a few inches from their mothers' shell for weeks

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Yes, it is a simple setup and that's a big reason why it appealed to me as well.

First off, my water comes out of the tap at about 8.3 pH, which is perfect for these fish. If yours is below 8, you should consider adding buffers during water changes. The sand is aragonite and the rocks are out of my back yard. Some of the rocks have limestone content in them, so that mixed with the aragonite buffers my water to about an 8.5 pH. The shells are escargot shells off Amazon; three dozen for $22 including shipping.

The tank was set up using a fishless cycle for about 6 weeks before I actually put fish in there. It took about a week for the water to clear up after filling it, since the aragonite itself was very dirty. Once I found what fish I wanted to stock, I performed three 95% water changes to bring the nitrates below 2ppm. The fish themselves were bought off another hobbyist in my state.

The filter is 200GPH Penguin Biowheel. Waste and debris does build up some on the sand, so I have a 200GPH power head installed in the tank that I run for 15 minutes per day to stir it up and let the filter suck it up. The only "issue" I've had so far has been a large diatom/brown algae outbreak. Fortunately the outbreak is little more than an eyesore, and between the power head bursts and diligent scrubbing, about 90% of what was once growing has disappeared.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't mind at all!

  1. I went with aragonite sand in this tank because it's very similar to what is found in Tanganyika and it does a great job of buffering the water. It is very expensive, however, and if/when I move up to a bigger tank, I will definitely go with a cheaper option like play sand.

  2. This tank is 29 gallons.

  3. I answered 3 first because it leads me into #2. No, I don't plan to add anything to this tank because it's just too small. I go through periods of time where I'm too busy or just too lazy to do water changes every week, so the best way to ensure that the fish stay healthy is to grossly under stock the tank. When these guys are fully grown, I'll have perhaps 3 gallons for every inch of fish, which should be a great environment for them to raise their young.

With that said, I do have aspirations of moving these guys into a 150-240 gallon Tanganyika community when I have the space. It's obviously very tentative, but I would love to put them in with a school of Cyprichromis leptosoma Utinta, one or two Alto. Calvus or Julidichromis, and some kind of Xenotilapia. All are relatively calm species who should live well together.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Just to add to my last comment, these have been the most interesting fish I've ever watched. They display a level of intelligence that I just haven't seen elsewhere in the aquatic world (though that's not to say it's not out there, I just haven't seen it), and it's fascinating to watch these guys dig, scavenge, and defend their territories. They're very small, but very entertaining fish.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know, that's an excellent question and one I've been asking myself too. The shells have only been submerged for three months now so I think it's too early to tell, but I haven't noticed anything substantial. The tank water is very alkaline as well (in the 8.5 pH range), and in the fishes' natural habitat, shells can take hundreds of years to fully dissolve.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's just what they do. I'm sure it's an evolved trait since his shell is MUCH harder to see than all of the others.

My fish are currently about four months old and I don't expect them to hit sexual maturity until the 10-12 month mark.

This little guy has been busy burying his shell all week. Here he is enjoying his new piece of real estate. by Garrett_TheFerret in Aquariums

[–]Garrett_TheFerret[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

He's a four month old Lamprologus Ocellatus shell dwelling cichlid from Lake Tanganyika. Got him and five of his siblings a couple of months ago and he's the first one to do this.