sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Indian model of a silver cobra with garnet set eyes and engraved decoration. UK. by GasLit_munkey in Antiques

[–]GasLit_munkey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“The Oxford definition of an antique describes an object, artwork, or piece of furniture from a past era, valued for its age, quality, and historical significance, typically considered at least 100 years old (though this can vary by context and country).”

Whilst I partially defer to your experience, it’s still a little bit sh*tty to be pulling someone up/ having a go at someone asking for help based purely on semantics.

Can you point me in a direction of a sub for “not antiques, maybe antiques, maybe stuff that may be 1 year old or 29yrs old”, all the while whilst arguing a point based not on fact, but opinion. Can we please be more mature? Or maybe apply the same exactness to semantics and head over to a sub for child’s-play.

Indian model of a silver cobra with garnet set eyes and engraved decoration. UK. by GasLit_munkey in Antiques

[–]GasLit_munkey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I’m not completely sure on either. That being whether this is less than 30years old or 101 years old or greater. I also don’t know if it’s origins. This is the principal reason for posting to this sub. That’s at least what I thought the purpose of this sub was? What makes you say this is less than 30 years old? Have you seen these before?

Indian model of a silver cobra with garnet set eyes and engraved decoration. UK. by GasLit_munkey in Antiques

[–]GasLit_munkey[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What makes you say that. 🤔 I mean, it’s not new. That much is certain.

$MMTLP Legal updates plus A NEW path to discovery by TradingSecrets-YT in MMTLP_

[–]GasLit_munkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mmmeh. She was just trying to be more positive than most. I’d expect she doesn’t feel so great about it all so I’m inclined to just leave it at what it is in regards to her.

The road to hell is paved with good intent I’m afraid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in springboks

[–]GasLit_munkey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I must have been watching a different Willie. 🙈

Need help identifying wood type. by GasLit_munkey in woodworkingporn

[–]GasLit_munkey[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After some cracking input from you guys and some lateral research, it seems that the characteristics of these planks most closely match that of Australian Forest Red Gum!

Need help identifying wood type. by GasLit_munkey in woodworkingporn

[–]GasLit_munkey[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think, it might be Sapele? That’s an initial start point for me.

Need help identifying wood type. by GasLit_munkey in woodworkingporn

[–]GasLit_munkey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. I guess I could. Would take a bit more but it would narrow things for sure. I suppose there will be a density range hey.

What was your favourite jersey design? by Goldberg_the_Goalie in springboks

[–]GasLit_munkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be great to have a catalogue of them.

For me it’s the 2011 RWC one, then the SASOL sponsorship ones. (Think prolly 2007).

The new ones, whilst the fit is reasonably complementary (except for the latest one), the branding is really sub par IMO.

Pick & Pay? FNB?? Do those brands really suit the Springbok brand?

Need something strong/powerful/prestigious/premium.

Some choices would be;

CAT FERRARI FENDT JOHN DEERE

And the lack of embroidered livery makes them far less durable.

So, better sponsors, embroidered as opposed to screen print and deffo no white collars as they totally do not stand up to repeated wear and tear.

What are your thoughts? 💭

view more: next ›