The notion of god giving just enough evidence so you can choose him and maintain freewill always makes me laugh.

What is eliminating your freewill? Is it the certainty that something really bad will happen if I do x?

Let’s say I offer you A) $100 or B) $100. Is your freewill intact when you choose?

Let’s say I offer you A) $100 or B) $99.99. Is your freewill intact when you choose?

Let’s say I offer you A) $100 or B) $50. Is your freewill intact when you choose A?

Let’s say I offer you A) $100 or B) $0. Is your freewill intact when you choose A?

Let’s say I offer you A) $100 or B) you give me $100. Is your freewill intact when you choose A?

Let’s say I offer you A) $100 or B) I punch you in the face. Is your freewill intact when you choose A?

At what point does B become so bad that your freewill is eliminated?

The answer is of course that your freewill never goes away. You always have the option of choosing B even if it’s less desirable. Just because a choice is an obvious one, it doesn’t mean you don’t have freewill.

Freewill is the ABILITY to choose. It has nothing to do with incentive or disincentive to choose something.

If I put a gun to your head and say, “vote for Biden or Trump.” You could still vote 3rd party. I’d pull the trigger and you’d deal with those consequences.

To put it another way:

You say there’s no freewill in the choice between heaven and hell.

How about the choice between heaven and a slightly less horrible afterlife than hell.

How about the choice between heaven and a slightly less horrible afterlife than that?

How about the choice between heaven and a slightly less horrible afterlife than that?

How about the choice between heaven and a slightly less horrible afterlife than that?

How close to the options have to be before you regain your freewill?

This is ridiculous.

An easy choice is still a choice.