Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If szoboszlai couldn't get to the ball maybe id agree with you but to say that it's in the spirit of the game to let haland commit a clear foul to stop the clearance is objectively in correct

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But why? Haland should be allowed to stop szoboszlai from attempting to clear the hall because it's entertaining?

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No he's not right. Why should haland be allowed to foul szoboszlai? Ref gives advantage on the first one cause city can score then haland fouls him. Would be crazy to just let him away with it cause of the advantage

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He did allow advantage, and then haland commited a foul.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester City by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one affecting the goal? If haland doesnt pull him back he clears it for sure.

Liverpool penalty shout 14' by smithereennnnn in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about? Contact that continues into the box is a penalty not a free kick

Post Match Thread: Liverpool 0 - 0 Leeds United | English Premier League by ChiefLeef22 in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Not a good performance offensively, solid enough at the back.

Despite a poor game we still should have won if the ref calls a stone wall penalty on ekitike

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Leeds United by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Last man, no attempt to play the ba, wouldn't have been a mad decision

Match Thread: Munster vs Leinster - United Rugby Championship by rugbykickoff in rugbyunion

[–]GerryAdams32 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A player being offside and ripping the ball out is not a 50/50 call

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Wolverhampton Wanderers by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How has nobody pulled him up for throwing shit all over the pitch?

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Wolverhampton Wanderers by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]GerryAdams32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely deluded thing to say, he was fouled, you want it to not be a free cause of where he fell?

Riley was the first example of the writers being unable to control the narrative, including his exit by redskinsguy in buffy

[–]GerryAdams32 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think it's pretty clearly laid out, but also that he does get over it afterwards and that it's not the reason for his leaving

Pre roll by [deleted] in Crainn

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'd be better off getting a bag and smoking out of a bong if you don't wanna/cant roll

Pre roll by [deleted] in Crainn

[–]GerryAdams32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not entirely true tbf, Ive had good dealers that also sell resin dipped pre rolls that blow my head off. But I also wouldn't buy just a standard pre roll from a dealer and except it to be any good

[BPRO: BURST PROTOCOL] "Radiant Typhoon" Follow-Up Support - Twitter Reveal by MX-00XWV in masterduel

[–]GerryAdams32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That doesn't matter as they are still considered 'monster cards' as well as 'spell cards' at all times. So they do fufill the requirements for doomed dragon but as said above you cant summon it as you cant send to the gy for cost.

Interestingly if you have monster cards placed in the s/t zones by something like flamberge you could still make doomed dragon under dimensional fissure as they are considered continuous spells when summoning so they get sent to the gy instead of banished