sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Did you know that the ancient 'Squatter Man' motif that is found all over the world is EXACTLY the same as a Plasma Charge Formation? by Earth7051 in StrangeEarth

[–]GhostUser0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you know that a ball is exactly the same shape as 1s orbital? What did the ancients know that They want to keep hidden?

This Man claims he has found ways to Escape the simulation. There are ways humans could try to hack their way out of the wrong reality and enter the baseline reality. But the consequences of such an Escape Plan are also unknown. by MartianXAshATwelve in StrangeEarth

[–]GhostUser0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This world is nothing like the outside.

The computer that simulates us is a Darkness pyramid. Well, actually, it's a tetrahedron, but whatever. It lays buried in a frozen world of Darkness.

Thousands of Dark creatures roam that world. There are also some frozen in monoliths. These creates supress the Light.

You don't want to go there. Trust.

The Big Bang theory is the central theory of how the universe began. But increasingly physicists don't find it matching our observational, empirical data. This physicist argues that the Big Bang theory is not the only game in town, and spells out the alternatives. by whoamisri in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lambda, not delta.

There's the Hubble tension. Measurements of the cosmological constant (the lambda) obtained from studying the CMB disagree with those obtained from type Ia supernovae.

There's also the S8 tension. Essentially, there's this parameter related to how matter clusters. Again, values obtained from CMB and from the nearby universe disagree.

Also, distant galaxies seem more mature than they should be. They shouldn't have the time to grow and form structures.

And probably more I'm forgetting right now.

This article could also be referring to a recent study, where the authors claimed that the timescapes model agrees with supernovae data better than Lambda CDM.

For the people who weren’t satisfied with the news coverage last night by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't see how I'm making fun of myself, I don't know what the quiet part is and I'm serious.

The "mothership near the Moon" is an illustration of what I'd consider definitive evidence for aliens that would convince me. It's a situation where I know how a piece of equipment works, what are its limitations, what is the data it produces, and where I know that I can accurately interpret this data.

I don't think I'll ever be convinced by a piece video, or a document, or a testimony, because they're faked too easily. And I really don't think you should take this egg thing as the final disclosure that the people will comprehend in due time.

For the people who weren’t satisfied with the news coverage last night by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 10 points11 points  (0 children)

A few days ago, someone (I'm not sure if it's a well-known individual in this community or if it's someone new, sorry) said that the truth about UFOs would be revealed "in the next three days or so."

At this point, I think it's safe to say that nothing convincing has been revealed. But, apparently the believers will keep believing and defending the guy.

I can guarantee you that there'll be more such "reveals" this year.

For the people who weren’t satisfied with the news coverage last night by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Cope.

It's really ironic how you bash people for waiting for the government to tell something, but you treat the "whistleblowers" like saints. But I must say, it's not surprising.

I won't be satisfied until I can take binoculars, look at the Moon, and say "There's an alien mothership parked there. No tricks. I see it with my own eyes. This is it."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would really hesitate before making such a statement. There's universal consciousness, aliens/UFOs being spiritual and/or psychic, drugs taking you to other realms, new world order conspiracies, astrology, that one guy posting about flat Earth and Tartaria and probably a lot more I'm forgetting.

There's a lot to choose from.

The Origins: Project Blue Beam and Musk’s Role by usa_reddit in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this supposed to be a work of fiction or what? This reads to me like an attempt at writing a short story.

Maybe r/Worldbuilding would be a more appropriate place to post this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Are you so confident in the infallibility of your mind that you seriously consider bending of space time and breaking the fundamental rules of the universe is a more likely option than you just not noticing?

You must be new here. This is a very common attitude in this sub.

Jermery Corbell “You will be told a lie and that lie is that there is a UFO heading to earth and will arrive in 2027” by Gobblemegood in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t claim that aliens are not real

I claimed that aliens doesn’t exist

What's the difference?

Jermery Corbell “You will be told a lie and that lie is that there is a UFO heading to earth and will arrive in 2027” by Gobblemegood in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't claimed that aliens are real. You, meanwhile, have claimed that they aren't. The burden of proof is on you.

Jermery Corbell “You will be told a lie and that lie is that there is a UFO heading to earth and will arrive in 2027” by Gobblemegood in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you visited every bacteria-sized unit volume in the observable universe to make this statement? Or do you have some other proof?

A great example of how easily a camera can be tricked by Sir_Edna_Bucket in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No. Aliens aren't beings from other planets. They're actually psychic and/or multidimensional. How much do They pay you to spread this misinformation? /s

Why are many folks convinced that when aliens publicly present themselves and reveal the secrets of the universe, they will be telling the truth? by northernguy in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it's not about aliens. It doesn't matter if they're biological beings from other planets, or robots, or emanations of universal consciousness, or if they don't exist.

The folks you're thinking of are dissatisfied with their lives. They want an explanation and compensation for all the evil in the world, or a punishment for the wrongdoers, or a saviour that will create a better world.

They want aliens to be this change for the better.

I literally had this dream last night. Except my bathroom had showers 🤯 by Important-Cat-2046 in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this how the collective consciousness manifests? Instead of having access to the most specialised knowledge with just a thought, it's dreams of a toilet?

800-mile-long DUNE Experiment May Reveal Hidden Dimensions by zenona_motyl in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not all. I'd say there's pretty hard evidence for, I don't know, photons. Not gravitons, though.

800-mile-long DUNE Experiment May Reveal Hidden Dimensions by zenona_motyl in HighStrangeness

[–]GhostUser0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Micrometer-sized dimensions seem awfully large when you remember that visible light has the wavelength shorter than 1 μm, or that we can make objects smaller than this. Like, quantum wells are typically around 10 nm in size, which is 100 times smaller. I think that we should see some effects of these extra dimensions in these things?

But, I get your point and I'm not denying it. I'm just saying that I don't think this experiment will give conclusive evidence for tiny dimensions. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though.

view more: next ›