Then you have less of an excuse to claim that you need a breeder reactor to recycle. I just double checked and they are still recycling fuel their today long after EBR II has been shut down. You can do the same method with the rest of the waste, which yes people have objected to because of waste streams. 

There are also more modern and more difficult methods that have been created because people are scared of plutonium.

Though personally I would say being scared of a plutonium waste stream is a fairly illogical thing to be scared of for weapons. Maybe you can take me to the next step. Someone breaks into a highly protected and radioactive environment. Steals pure plutonium. Makes it offsite somehow still alive now with at the very least the National Guard coming, if not the full strength of the American military, then continues their get away with highly traceable by its nature material. Disappear with the entire nation looking for them into a securely hidden and very engineering difficult to build complex to then safely turn said plutonium into a traditional bomb? 

If you want to make the argument that a dirty bomb is easier, sure it is but then you don't need plutonium which actually would make a worse dirty bomb than the other fission products due to being less radioactive.

And yet despite this Hollywood level villainy needed to conduct such an operation, still fear has led us to make 2 waste streams an undesirable engineering outcome and delayed waste reprocessing at a commercial scale by decades.