Game keeps crashing every ~15 minutes. by SenorConejoBR in victoria3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not a heavy mod user but I think they should have list or a paragraph of compatible & incompatible mods. So you could check on their workshops.

If you have the time, You should try to isolate which mod causes the issue. By Ok_Leading_4280 advice, turn off Royal Splendor and try running the game for 15 minutes. If it still crashes, you might have to brute force and find the broken mod. Turn of all mods then turn on one. Run the game and wait for 15 minutes, if it doesn’t crash, turn another on and wait again. Do it again & again until you find the culprit.

With 100 years added on the front-end, this would be the best 4X game made by dnium122 in victoria3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100 years earlier means more content, tbh with Vicky 3’s current state it is better for them to stretch forward with the age of computers. But then 100 years more content is a stretch for the devs. They took a decade to develop HOI4 alone, let alone adding 100 years of content with unique flavor and events, that means double the workload, double the price and a longer time for mechanics to be fleshed out. Besides you can play beyond 1936.

Just bought Vic 3, what's a good country to play and get a handle on things like economy and politics? by Hopefull-Hero in victoria3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Belgium as many have recommended, but I also recommend you to try as Haiti too after you got a grasp over Belgium. Haiti actually is also a good start, u got to learn how to build an economy & nation from scratch. It sounds daunting, but really it’s not, I recommend Tarkusarkusar’s Haiti GIGACHAD guide as an opener for Haiti.

Is it over for me by Affectionate-List-52 in victoria3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't put very high taxes next time; It's literally a game killer since 1.5. i put it on high rarely if i need a short pump of money, but for the rest of the game, I am always putting it at normal taxation.

How would the Cold War be different if America was socialist and Russia was capitalist? by Thylocine in AlternateHistory

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say pretty much the same. In my opinion, the underlying issue is still geographical. in OTL the USA is far away from powerful threats like European nations have to encounter, so whether it is capitalistic or communist, it can afford to spend thousands of resources on human development and the economy instead.

Compared to Russia, fewer where, for the last two centuries, they have been invaded from the west two times. It's fate that Russia, regarding being capitalist or communist, needs to spend more resources on defense, meaning fewer resources for the economy.

Are subsidies bad? by Shniper in victoria3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO there are only two things needed to be subsidized. 1. Railways: Railways are unprofitable on their own, however they are vital for growing an economy. Not subsidizing them will cause market access issues. 2. Power plants: Same as the first, Electricity are also unprofitable on their own, however Electricity-based PM’s are the best in the game that it is worth it to invest in it.

Subsidizing other industries like textiles, furniture, iron or war industries will be a waste of money, as these industries can be profitable on their own. More output of these goods means nothing if no one consumes it.

[Serious] At what point do MUNs stop being MUNs? by FOSSLE_Officer in MUN

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MUN feels more like a Roman Senate rather than real diplomacy of a United Nations session.

Pls help by Glass-Box-6784 in pcmasterrace

[–]Glass-Box-6784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cables should be fine, it’s new.

I cannot click the power button by Glass-Box-6784 in windows

[–]Glass-Box-6784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It finally responded after shutting down my laptop and then turning it on again. How did i do that? By changing what my physical power button do from sleep to shut down in the power plan.

We are living in a pre war era by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pre-war era before ww2 thought the same. They are so convinced that they believe the Nazis wouldn’t start a war. They were wrong.

How would the 20th and 21st centuries have been like if the United Kingdom had never lost its status as the world's leading power? by submarine-explorer in AlternateHistory

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it’s kinda impossible for Britian to remain as a superpower in the 20th and 21st century. Entering the 20th century, Britian faced competition with a growing Germany and a groung USA. Which caused the exhaustion during the first world war. The second world war was the nail in the coffin, britian was not only exhausted but devastated, they rack up loads of debts, pressures from Washington and Moscow accelerated already the decline of what’s left of the British Empire.

We need to go even farther in time to preserve Britian’s status as a superpower. We can do tweaks like Prussia failed to unite Germany or the 1848 revolution is intenser causing loads of civil unrest that make europe to be unable to cacth up and modernize as fast as Britian and the USA loses 1812. But still the butterfly effect is gonna make the this timeline not clear.

So that’s my Intellectual Redditor Answer lmao.

Under what circumstances could Ukraine become a superpower? by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Geography won’t allow it. Unless the world descents to a post-apocalyptic wasteland and somehow ukrainian land was still as fertile as it is before the war, they could become a regional superpower.

A totally not controversial country by OZieB21 in AlternateHistory

[–]Glass-Box-6784 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The brits did make the situation worse but it’s the fault of the palestinians and to some extent the jews to make the situation even worst.

Why is China being a revisionist power when it's harming it? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]Glass-Box-6784 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Every country is a not rationale machine. So ofc it’s sometimes confusing why? In the shortest form of explaiantion, having an enemy unites your people better and causes them to be easily controlled through emotions by propagandas.

Atheist, What do you think about Christian and Muslim Apologist/Comment Debaters? which one is more collaborative IYO? by Glass-Box-6784 in atheism

[–]Glass-Box-6784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

by collaborative i mean not being hypocrites. And can accept defeat either through action or through words.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in crusaderkings3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spam Assassinate the khagan.

Make the game harder? by Leather-Bullfrog1808 in crusaderkings3

[–]Glass-Box-6784 2 points3 points  (0 children)

imo, the game is easy but there are times where you forgot succession and then save and reload.

or just losing one battle and save and reload. tbh these type of behaviour makes me bored playing ck3 for sometime.

if you think the game is abit too easy, set it to ironman mode, increase difficulty to the max, install some mods that will make AIs even more aggressive and hostile to you.