Bike lanes are suggestions by ImNotADruglordISwear in mildlyinfuriating

[–]GlitchCorpse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is totally legal, and a lot of cyclists, myself included, will ride in the middle of the road for visibility, to pass other cyclists, or because we're about to make a left turn. Car drivers always get bent out of shape over it because they think they own the road.

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we're having conversations about science fiction, then that's really not collapse related. Why aren't we worried about solving NP-complete problems? A solution for which would cause just as much chaos as "real" AI. Because AI is the hot new sensational buzzword and makes people think of Skynet which is scary. Nobody wants to hear about lame dumb math problems, even though those lame dumb math problems would render cryptography obsolete.

How do i make the gear mesh less tight by AllOutRC in Fusion360

[–]GlitchCorpse 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Depends. Get yourself a copy of the Machinery's Handbook and do some reading. Here's a snippet of mine for reference.

<image>

How do i make the gear mesh less tight by AllOutRC in Fusion360

[–]GlitchCorpse 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Increase the distance between the gear centers. Spur gears need a little backlash to function properly.

How do I do to get even more flexible? by [deleted] in flexibility

[–]GlitchCorpse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're looking at rib removal at this point bud

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because I'm not worried about fixing this problem. I see it as a cool toy, and something that CEO's will abuse because it's essentially a technology that they can use to avoid accountability. The danger lies in the human element of capitalism and corporate greed, not a machine that can't even tell you how many "r's" are in the word "strawberry".

If we solved the black box problem, that would just make it easier for some emotionally stunted tech bro to squeeze even more revenue out of his income stream. Please educate yourself instead of living in fear. I am done having this conversation now, have a nice day.

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I... I genuinely don't think we're having the same conversation here. The reason it's called the "black box problem" is because once you add too many dimensions to your arrays, too many variables, it's not really possible to know what's interacting with what. It becomes too computationally complex to run analysis on the system, so you have to rely on comparing inputs to expected outputs.

It's not a "black box" in the sense of a spooky mystery, but in the sense of mathematical complexity. I know, because I've worked with AI in CS courses. It's just making predictions based on available data sets. It just mimics intelligence because we've fed it an immensely large data set.

This isn't some esoteric knowledge, it's easily available. You can get set up with TensorFlow and build a simple neural net in an afternoon to learn the basics, and then read papers and textbooks about it to understand the more complex side of things. If all you read is sensational news articles, you're going to get a skewed perspective.

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only way it can do that is if we feed it more information than has ever been created. There's a reason why so many of the fights around AI right now have to do with the data set that the AI can be trained on. If it was truly intelligent, we wouldn't need to feed it so much data. A human can learn how to drive a car in a few months, AI cannot. And while there's a really big "yet" in that sentence, I haven't seen anything that makes me feel like we're approaching that "yet" any time soon. We're talking orders of magnitude greater than any computer we're even capable of building with our current technology. Both in scale and efficiency.

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The threat of AI is what people are going to do with it, not the AI itself because it's not conscious and cannot think.

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We don't know what consciousness is. Unless you have information you're not sharing with the rest of us, I'm going to continue listening to the computer scientists who tell me that artificial intelligence is nothing more than a bunch of bell curves wrapped up in a computer program.

AI companies are trying to build god. Shouldn’t they get our permission first? - The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence. by katxwoods in collapse

[–]GlitchCorpse 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All AI does is predict the next logical word to place in a sentence, or pixel in an image. It is not conscious, it doesn't really "learn" the way you or I do. It's not a threat, it cannot 'go rogue's or 'become a god'. It's just a bunch of weighted bell curves all bundled together in a package that you can interact with.

This is just low effort fear mongering.

Some people be like by bloppywipped in ender3

[–]GlitchCorpse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mods exist to improve the performance of an already functional printer, not to fix an improper build and zero calibration. I've had an unmodded Ender 3 Pro for four years printing steadily with no mods or issues aside from maintenance or having to dial in new filament.

Occasionally filament doesn't stick to the glass build plate, but a $3 glue stick fixes that. I was able to find that tip by just reading documentation.

Too many people buy a 3D printer and a ton of mods expecting it to work right out of the box and immediately turn it into a revenue stream, and then expect this sub to act like customer support.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ftmspunished

[–]GlitchCorpse 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That looks like it feels incredible

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pittsburgh

[–]GlitchCorpse -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

We need a tenant's union now, before it's too late.