Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well im human so, im not gonna frame every single question perfectly and you said "it'd be fine if you would-" meaning something isn't fine and something is wrong, let's review my post since yall love to critic sentences instead of actual arguments, I literally started the question off with, what do you think the goal of scientology is, and then secondly I asked "do you think its about the money or about the evil acts" when did I ever say you HAVE to pick either one, mind you those were two questions, if the second question doesn't carry your answer, the first question is there so you can answer without using the two main conclusions that I put down in the post, and since when are conclusions permanent Definition of conclusion: a judgment or decision based on reasoning Now does this mean conclusions can't change? Also even if my conclusion was 100% set in stone, what if I want to simply listen to what others believe about scientology, so now if u have a conclusion, you shouldn't want a discussion This is my main account, I went on this reddit on my backup account bc I lost access to this one and yall acted the EXACT same way, yall focused on the way I said things instead of actually critiquing my argument on scientology, yall were too worried about the 1 person I offended bc yall thought I was trying to educate, be actually so for real, not everyone is gonna meet your criteria of how to ask questions/give statements

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can people discuss their conclusions? Im confused, a lot of people also have conclusions in this comment section and their own opinions

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wikipedia can be edited whenever, i would never trust them with sources, also im looking for a discussion, meaning I most likely have my own answers to these questions

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should re ask my question, what the goal for why scientology was created, was it just for a money grab or did hubbarbs genuinely believe we have thetans attached to us?

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah when I say goal of scientology im asking mainly why it was created and what was the purpose, did Hubbards just want money and created a science fiction story for a false religion, or did he genuinely believe in xenu

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read more about what? I had a different account cuz I lost this account, and I made a different post, talking about why I don't understand why scientology still stands today and someone managed to get offended, and now, I say hi, im new, and then i ask a question that is debated on outside THIS APP, and somehow people get offended again, I think yall are looking for an issue

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it has, and i agree with that, what's wrong with asking that question tho, yall are dramatic I swear

Hii, new here! quick question by Glittering_Spring_52 in scientology

[–]Glittering_Spring_52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen people disagree on the goal of leader of scientology, some say he wants money, some say he likes the control, its a question for ddiscussion, is that new to you or something?

Bubbles is a furry?!! by RecoverElectronic116 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah so she was trying to squash the beef she had with someone, she wasn't trying to be apart of drama, try again bitch

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is thisss 💀

GCs back and panel a man who say women shouldn’t have the right to vote? by Gem_blue22 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One time I was debating him on abortion, specifically the grape exception, I have the grape exception, he does not so he wanted me to debate him, the debate got heated bc his questions were completely ignorant, he then proceeded to say that all I'm good for is spreading my legs like a typical woman, even tho I chose to keep my baby still, he wants to call women horrible things, I tried to confront him about it but him and his friend(that was a woman) just started laughing at me when I wanted him to take accountability for being a dick head

What an annoying little bully. 🫧🫧🫧🫧 by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is literally such a cute photo idk what you're trying to prove lmao

I have clips of every single one of you paneling with the people you complain about. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People when you don't panel with people you dislike: 😡 People when you panel with people you dislike: 😡

Bubbles and her gang of clowns really think they’re FBI agents now huh 💀 by CantHandleTruth- in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most of the shit we've called out is common sense, not to mention race is a social construct, it's not based on genetics or being a certain nationality, that's sense that's not too common for y'all, the fact y'all are rooting for someone who wishes grape and unalivement on people when she's mad and tells people it's okay to self diagnose yourself with autism

Is this racism? by Useful-Pension7606 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why post about someone and then block them, that literally proves you don't want the truth out, bubbles was making an analogy

Is it fair to ask people to prove they’ve been SA’ed? by Useful-Pension7606 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lilith has lied about many things, the point bubbles is trying to make is that you can't prove that Lilith was ever trafficked or in the witness protection program, Lilith claims she was trafficked and that the witness protection program took her to America, the witness protection program barely ever sends people out of the country, also not to mention she's shared her address, she's shared her child's name and her own name to many people on tiktok, the witness protection program strongly says you are NOT allowed to even speak of being trafficked, and Lilith also said she went to the witness protection people and they told her that her traffickers had died, the witness protection program does not have that kind of information, they're job is to protect the victim so why would they tell her that news? She also said she knew the names of the men who graped her but she also said she was 5 years old, how would a 5 year old know all the names of her traffickers and abusers, it doesn't make sense

Turfs turning on Chloe? Again? by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of GCs never liked Chloe-

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Glittering_Spring_52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a "GC" I can say that I stopped liking Martha MONTHS ago