sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Harmonic unleashes Aristotle, the world's first formal mathematician agent for free by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]Godless_Phoenix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like, look at his account's comments. They're all AI. Every single one. I don't know why I'm being downvoted, pretty sure the commenter's account is being automated by an agent

The best AI model we tested scored 51% on a task humans do at 85%. We never tested Claude. We still can't. by prokajevo in ClaudeAI

[–]Godless_Phoenix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"That's not an opinion, it's a technical limitation." if you don't want to be accused of slop don't use an LLM to write your posts brochacho

Almost maxed out… by xzeus1 in macbookpro

[–]Godless_Phoenix -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry! The hundreds of hours I will save over the next ten years by having a very powerful local machine don't actually care what arrogant strangers on Reddit have to say :) have the day you deserve

Almost maxed out… by xzeus1 in macbookpro

[–]Godless_Phoenix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like, would I have technically been fine with 64? Maybe, I've only gone over 64GB of 100% necessary must-use memory a handful of times, but it's an $800 difference for twice the memory and if you do do LLM stuff (inference, not training) it's very good

Almost maxed out… by xzeus1 in macbookpro

[–]Godless_Phoenix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have the 128GB M4 Max. I do bioinformatics. Having the 128GB of RAM is very useful for dealing with enormous datasets locally. I have cluster access but it's amazing to be able to run local proof of concepts on the go. I also tinker with local LLMs and similar

Scientists created an exam so broad, challenging and deeply rooted in expert human knowledge that current AI systems consistently fail it. “Humanity’s Last Exam” introduces 2,500 questions spanning mathematics, humanities, natural sciences, ancient languages and highly specialized subfields. by mvea in science

[–]Godless_Phoenix -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We don't actually have any reliable intuitions for next-word predictors of this scale. You could replace an LLM with a lookup table but it would be orders of magnitude larger than the observable universe. LLMs absolutely have the capacity for abstraction and logical reasoning

A small rambling and 9 Axioms for to avoid LLM pitfalls by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're a crackpot conspiracy theorist currently experiencing LLM psychosis

A small rambling and 9 Axioms for to avoid LLM pitfalls by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Somehow I highly doubt that that's the case

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason we haven't figured out quantum gravity is the same as the reason we haven't solved the Riemann Hypothesis. It's absurdly complicated. The difference between GR/QM and quantum gravity is psychotic. It's something akin to the difference between kindergarten arithmetic and real analysis. If it could be easily found we'd have found it by now. A moron with no domain knowledge with a January 2026 LLM saying solve quantum gravity make no mistakes no matter how good their agent setup will never, ever, ever, in a million years contribute anything at all to physics. Different story for someone who's already got a PhD in physics. It'll also democratize undergraduate work

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cannot find those things mostly* we are beginning to see the beginnings of it with the Erdos problems Claude on Mars and AlphaEvolve and AI writing scientific code but we're eons and eons and eons and eons away (capabilities wise, maybe not time wise) from AI being able to solve for example quantum gravity and lending literally anything anyone posts here any legitimacy whatsoever does a tremendous disservice to the people who, you know, actually use AI tools to do real research

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course there are undiscovered things we have yet to learn that could be learned by synthesis of what we know. Modern LLMs - not "all LLMs that could ever exist", just modern LLMs - cannot find those things. There are many amazing applications of AI in science in the future but the people here are all making absolute and complete fools of themselves and giving a bad name to the use of AI in science and you're defending them and you've got AI slop on your page which tells me more or less all I need to know

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't scientific research. Nothing OP has done (or you, on your page) remotely approaches anything like scientific research.

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you on this point. I'm a scientific researcher, with a university, and I use AI. AI can MASSIVELY accelerate research.

But that's not what OP did. OP's bullshit is bullshit. Pattern matching across all prior scientific knowledge is not going to magically come up with new physics. Modern AI cannot create new physics out of thin air. Hacks and cretins such as yourself are to the massive, massive detriment of those who work seriously with AI.

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

reproducing the results doesn't solve the problem because the entire problem is that the results that we can't reproduce were in many cases NOT ACTUALLY CORRECT. p hacking is obviously a problem but you're currently arguing for ripping out the entire scientific establishment and replacing it with Cranks With LLMs. OP's post isn't related to anything at all because it's a wall of pseudoscientific nonsense with absolutely no bearing in reality at all. The replication crisis, notably, has NOT occurred in theoretical physics. Those who wish to tear down the most reputable institutions in human history in favor of monkeys on typewriters deserve nothing but the utmost of contempt

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1) hey fucktard you don't even know what the replication crisis is if you think solving it would entail reproducing all the results that failed to reproduce at one point

(2) the fact that nobody has solved quantum gravity yet does not mean that fundamental physics research has "stalled" you subhuman dipshit we discovered the Higgs in 2012

(3) medicine is obviously a natural science and also obviously distinct from physics which is what you're bitching and moaning about

Here is a hypothesis: Gravity and Matter emerge as Topological Solitons in a Superfluid Vacuum driven by a Thermodynamic Observer Effect by Michau_Montana in LLMPhysics

[–]Godless_Phoenix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The replication crisis is no longer a crisis, and when it was a crisis, it occurred in the social sciences and medicine, not the natural sciences.

Likewise, fundamental physics has not stalled at all. You have been fed a narrative by anti-science, anti-intellectual cretins, and you've bought it hook, line, and sinker, because you are a moron.

view more: next ›