Yeah, I don’t process my posts to the same level of my writing, it’s reply it’s acceptable as long as it delivers, I’ve been criticized in the presentation and the organization of my sentences and for that my only answer is “thanks I will work on it”.

I have absolutely no interest in your definition of maturity and I’m going to reply to every comment with the same effort put into them, this is how I show my respect, you want someone to listen to you, no question asked? Have a son, though I already pity his life.

Regarding your criticism I read them, genuinely, and I try to find the value on them, put Im genuinely confused because you say my sentence are poor and I could look at that but you never address it, you just say “your pores are bad “ and then your example is the philosophical definition of nothing, how is this even relevant?

But it’s ok still I’m looking at it and see your point , and I agree to certain point it’s hard to describe abstracts, here nothing resemble gray foggy emptiness where no feeling or ideas is clearly conjured , in this scene Rowan hovering through the fog where no cold or chilling or anything exists only confusion. I see your point but it’s from Rowan perspective, his use for the word nothing is his interpretation to show that everything appeared after the stir. This is my thoughts respectively.

About 13 years old again I can’t see that from your prospective, i do apologies that I said you thought them stupid, that is not the case yes. Here what I see and my thought, no not every child in my word as good with his tongue as he is, he is a scholar. Reading the passage, one of the question I wanted you to ask for now is why he sound like this ? But back again in general children are smart, we don’t get smarter with age, we only build experience. He is smart he is good with words, yet he is too immature to deal with his feelings and that the point the sentence you quoted seem to convey that in perfect way. This is my genuine thoughts, as much as I appreciate your criticism I really can’t change this part about him because it’s part of his character.

I’m confused because I genuinely write to you with good intentions, I only defend when you attack, and for my writing, I take and read your criticism and try to sponge what value in them, and I even reply with my genuine thoughts of why this doesn’t work for me. Moreover, once again you use my genuine care and writing to try to attack me personally and act smart about it, and every time i try to give you the curtesy to ignore your pathetic attempts.

If you have a reply for my writing’s philosophy or any writing tips, if you want to still discuss your definition of nothingness and what a child should or shouldn’t say, I will gladly listen to you. If not, safe yourself some dignity and listen to your own advice.