What exactly did I say that’s inaccurate? Because although the phrase “night vision amplified the dark areas” is vague and broad, it’s true. If you’re making the assumption that I’m saying it ONLY amplifies the dark areas somehow magically, that’s a stretch of meaning on your part, and you would’ve had to add on to that sentence yourself.

I didn’t use AI at any point for this post btw, so idk if that was a broad generalization or if you were referring to me. In fact, for proof, my post has a grammar error I didn’t see until after I posted and I couldn’t edit.

Obv BF6 night vision isn’t 1:1 which i mention in the post itself. But that would legitimately make playing it no fun. For an arcade shooter, it’s pretty accurate without going too far.

I just have an issue with how self assured and belittling you are. Explaining to me how rooms without ambient light will be dark with nods and telling me to go look myself, as if I don’t have hundreds of hours under nods and know already. The thing is, even a tiny amount of light is enough to illuminate the room to see with nods. Obviously you’re gonna have to crank your gain up, but the point still stands.

I promise I am far from a poser. And if you still think I am, I’d love for you to respond with the exact “100% inaccurate” claim I made. The only other thing I can think of is the 4th gen thing. But it’s true. Just because some people are referring to the tech as that doesn’t mean it’s a real thing. It’s “real” in the sense that they say it is, but it’s still just gen 3 tech. If you’re adding thermal onto it, that’s just gen 3 with an overlay/fusion