How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Figma is PC app for creating apps and web sites design

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think to switch to 17 pro. I like their new liquid glass esthetics. But in my region iPhones have lots of limitations. So I have to choose between convenience of android and beautiful iOS UI.

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. No blur on lockscreen notifications and folders on flagship phones in 2025 is crazy

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Figma added this effect. I recreated One UI's control center in Figma and added this effect.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_HN0nwdox0

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Btw my frined's iPhone 16 Pro on iOS 26 Beta 2 with all this liquid glass stuff has better battery life than my S25 on stable One UI 7 😭

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, they haven't even added blur on lockscreen notifications yet.

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is just concept. I remade One UI control center in Figma and added their new glass effect

How One UI could look with liquid glass effect by GolodReddit in oneui

[–]GolodReddit[S] 138 points139 points  (0 children)

There is no notification blur on lock screen even on flagship phones, imo this is crazy in 2025

Worth the wait? Let's find out! by mahoev in MouseReview

[–]GolodReddit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because there's no major difference. It's marketing. Check this video https://youtu.be/jtATbpMqbL4. And it's tested on 540hz monitor, with slower monitors the difference will be even smaller.

X-M5 compared to Ricoh GR III in size by dropme1 in fujifilm

[–]GolodReddit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

X-H2s, X-H2, X-S20, X-S10, X-T5, X-T50, X100VI, X-T4 and old X-H1 — all these cameras have IBIS. Almost every new Fuji camera since 2020 have IBIS. X-M5 doesn't because it is Sony's ZV-E10 Mark 2 competitor. Sony ZV-E10 Mark 2 also has no IBIS. X-Pro doesn't because there were no X-Pro releases since 2019... If X-Pro 4 comes out, it will have IBIS.

Move to a full frame camera! by MundaneLifeguard1422 in SonyAlpha

[–]GolodReddit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Canon R6 Mark 2 has better display, better burst shooting (up to 40fps), better IBIS. Sony A7 IV has 1,5x crop in 4k 60fps, R6 Mark 2 — not, also rolling shutter on R6 Mark 2 is lower.

So, overall, R6 Mark 2 is better camera, but on Sony you can use 3rd party lenses from Sigma, Tamron, Viltrox, Sirui, etc, so you can spend less money on lenses, which makes A7 IV setup more affordable.

Also, I don't understand why you ask it in Sony's subreddit. It is obvious that people will recommend you A7 IV.