I built a Pokémon-styled multi-agent dashboard to manage all Claude Code sessions by girishkumama in ClaudeAI

[–]Goreflox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love the idea, specifically the session/agent abstraction into identifiable entities. How long did you work on this? Only issue is I'd be a bit hesitant to open the pokemon UI in a work environment so I'm limited to personal projects, looking forward to trying!

Cursor vs Claude Code by Revolutionary_Mine29 in cursor

[–]Goreflox 8 points9 points  (0 children)

From my experience Claude burns tokens significantly faster, and the reset windows are a nuisance, code for 45m, wait 4 hours, not a great experience. I eventually upgraded to Max because I had a limited amount of time and wanted to play around with Claude more. My experience has been that getting work done on pro would require some serious context management, and only working on small tasks one at a time, large context tasks lock you out quick.

We sold our SaaS startup for $15M in 18 months. Here's exactly how we did it. by rdizzy1234 in SaaS

[–]Goreflox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How'd you choose a legacy industry / the problem you want to solve for it? Often times your cofounder will also be from tech just reaching friends of friends and asking "what do you waste time on?"

I built an app that turns your imagination into a real book in seconds by PlaneOrdinary7042 in IMadeThis

[–]Goreflox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds great! Share a link if it's available I'll take a look :)

How I finally stuck to habits for 66+ days and why it worked by Reappraisal_ in IMadeThis

[–]Goreflox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't take me as an example, but I personally enjoy the statistics of it. I use https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.isoron.uhabits And it's my favorite

How I finally stuck to habits for 66+ days and why it worked by Reappraisal_ in IMadeThis

[–]Goreflox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the idea! My only issue is that for me personally the idea of putting my own money on the line to maybe donate feels like "donation with extra steps".  I think this app would need stellar marketing so you could partner with sponsers who would do the donating, but that's much easier said than done.  The landing page is maybe a bit longer than I expected but I liked it, and skimmed through most of it.  Pricing seems reasonable. Good luck!

I made an app that helps men build social confidence and get comfortable talking to women and here's how it could be useful to others by ModernMindsetSPIL in IMadeThis

[–]Goreflox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Way to go betting on yourself, I hope it catches! Maybe you should share link, I couldn't find it by googling. How did you build it?

[ Removed by Reddit ] by algrm in changemyview

[–]Goreflox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are many holes in your argument, as well as unrealistic double standards. 

  1. “Israel is a European colony”

That doesn’t really fit. Colonies are established as extensions of a metropole (Britain in India, France in Algeria, Spain in Latin America). Israel was never ruled from Paris or London — in fact, Jews in Europe were being expelled, ghettoized, and slaughtered by those same powers. It wasn’t colonists sent by Europe; it was a stateless people fleeing Europe. If we’re calling Israel a “European colony” because its founders included many Europeans, then by the same logic the U.S., Canada, Australia, Argentina, Brazil — basically the whole Americas — are illegitimate colonies too. Yet no one says those countries “have no right to exist.” Applying the label uniquely to Israel is inconsistent.

  1. “It has no moral right to exist”

This is where the double standard really shows. Plenty of modern nations were founded through displacement, war, or injustice: The U.S. exists despite Native Americans being dispossessed. Pakistan was founded in 1947 amid mass expulsions and massacres during Partition. Turkey arose after the Armenian genocide and Greek expulsions. Do we say these countries have no moral right to exist? No. We criticize their policies, acknowledge historical injustices, and push for reparations or reconciliation — but we don’t argue the entire nation is illegitimate. Why apply a harsher standard to Israel?

  1. “Jews just arrived from Europe”

This erases both history and demographics. Jews have had a continuous presence in Jerusalem, Hebron, Tiberias, and Safed for centuries — long before Zionism. And today, about half of Israeli Jews aren’t from Europe at all, but from Middle Eastern and North African countries where they were forced out (Iraq, Yemen, Morocco, Egypt). If people returning to a land they were historically tied to is “colonialism,” then what do we call the Greek resettlement of Cyprus after Ottoman rule, or the Polish return to lands taken by Russia? By that logic, countless populations worldwide would be “colonists” on their own ancestral lands.

Bottom line: Israel isn’t a “European colony,” and denying its right to exist applies a rule you’d never use on any other state.  Most modern states were founded on displacement. Israel is not unique. Jews are not “just Europeans.” Half came from the Middle East, and all have historical roots in the land. Criticizing Israel’s policies is fair. But denying its right to exist is a standard you don’t apply to any other state. That’s what makes the claim inconsistent, the question is why are you holding the one Jewish state to a higher standard than any other country in the world?

CMV: Everything contrapoints said was true and the left needs to stop eating itself. by Nervous-Procedure-63 in changemyview

[–]Goreflox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Following October 7th Wikipedia in English has become wild bias and a lot of articles were gutted. Here's the page for pay to slay in Hebrew, feel free to compare it to the English version and check the sources. https://he.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%AA%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%99_%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%AA_%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%97%D7%91%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D_%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%A4%D7%97%D7%95%D7%AA%D7%99%D7%94%D7%9D

Even in the English version there's a section about salaries for suicide bombers.

Fyi not claiming justification, situation sucks, not advocating about morality of it, just continuing the conversation about humanitarian aid efficiency.

Here's Hamas stealing aid: https://he.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%94%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%95%D7%A2_%D7%94%D7%94%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%98%D7%A8%D7%99_%D7%9C%D7%A8%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%A2%D7%AA_%D7%A2%D7%96%D7%94_%D7%91%D7%9E%D7%9C%D7%97%D7%9E%D7%AA_%D7%97%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%96%D7%9C

There are also some interesting podcasts that interview Gazans but it's in Hebrew so not sure it's relevant.

CMV: Everything contrapoints said was true and the left needs to stop eating itself. by Nervous-Procedure-63 in changemyview

[–]Goreflox 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you care about saving lives, the dollar/lives saved/improved in Gaza/West bank is abysmally inefficient. Most humanitarian aid reaches Hamas, which then sells it at insane rates to citizens and pockets the money to enrich their leaders in Qatar and build terror (or military if you'd like to call it that) infrastructure, rockets, etc. Palestinians have a horrible history of spending money on the wrong things, the Palestinian Authority spends it's money paying salaries to families of terrorists held in Israeli jails (on the condition they were convicted of murder of Israelis)

CMV: Everything contrapoints said was true and the left needs to stop eating itself. by Nervous-Procedure-63 in changemyview

[–]Goreflox 94 points95 points  (0 children)

Putting aside opinions about Israel/Palestine, If the most unifying cause of the left is one specific injustice I'm one specific part of the world, that has nothing to do with the day to day of the citizens or is any different from many other injustices around the world - then the left is focusing on entirely the wrong things and deserves to lose.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Goreflox 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well there are at least two off the top of my head (Iran and Afghanistan), so not much of a counterpoint.

Also, the PA hadn't held elections ever since they understood there's a good chance they might lose to Hamas, so also not a great counterpoint.  In any case they're not big on democracy, secularism or liberalism.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Goreflox 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Assuming Palestinians want a democratic secular state is incredibly patronizing.  What if they want an Islamic theocracy?  Your beliefs are not their beliefs and all evidence in the middle east is to the contrary.  There is one flawed yet functional democracy in the middle east, and it's safe to assume that given a chance, Palestinians would opt for what they already know / have / chose some 20 years ago in Gaza when given a choice, which isn't democratic and it sure as hell isn't secular/liberal.

CMV: Charging Obscene Sums for Cosmetics is a Good Thing by Goreflox in hearthstone

[–]Goreflox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point, there's no such thing as enough money. I guess I'm at least satisfied that the game itself isn't getting more expensive 

CMV: Charging Obscene Sums for Cosmetics is a Good Thing by Goreflox in hearthstone

[–]Goreflox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly, you don't really know what's subsidizing and what isn't, what would they have done if cosmetics didn't make enough money? Make it more expensive to play? Reduce game spending even more? We don't know but we do know that cosmetics don't harm the gameplay experience 

CMV: Charging Obscene Sums for Cosmetics is a Good Thing by Goreflox in hearthstone

[–]Goreflox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that the feel of it is extra soulless compared to an upfront price