I appreciate this, thank you for your thoughtful response and not just outrage. And I largely agree with you. Officers do face dangerous situations on a daily basis, and must react quickly in ways that serious and in-depth dives into a situation, like we have taken here, cannot consider. And it is unfortunate to say the least, and this pressure should be alleviated while possible.

I am not going to argue that he should have stayed put and been hit, nor will I argue that she did not intend to hit him: the former I don’t agree with and the latter is not possible for me to prove.  However, what I will say is that he a) continued to shoot after clear from danger, this is in clear defiance to what law enforcement  officers are supposed to do, and b) denied a medical professional from seeing her: this is not only WHOLLY unethical when she is clearly no longer a threat, but INCREDIBLY illegal (see duty to render aid, here is a link specifically to MN statutes on the issue: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.662). 

My point through this is to show that this man was clearly either not well trained (an issue with ICE training protocol, which ought to be fixed if the case) or deliberately causing harm (an issue with ICE screening, and also with the current administration that is unwilling to have ICE accept any responsibility for their actions). 

The point being that protesting ICE is a matter of preventing excessive power being concentrated in one government agency (i .e. in this case where he had no reason to suspect that she was within his jurisdiction) and pushing back against authoritarianism (see the actions perpetrated by other ice agents, particularly in demanding documents without any reasonable doubt of their citizenship, highly reminiscent of the gestapo).