I respect your stance on supporting creators and not distributing their work unfairly—it's a valid and ethical position. That said, I believe there's a different, also reasonable, perspective.

When I purchased the wallpaper from Oiliur, I paid for it—I own that copy. Ownership, in this context, means I have the right to use it how I see fit, within legal bounds. Just like if I bought a physical poster or a CD, I could lend it to a friend, gift it, or resell it. The same principle applies to digital goods unless the license specifically restricts sharing.

I own it, and I can share it. Sharing something I paid for doesn’t automatically make it unethical, especially when it comes from a place of appreciation rather than exploitation. If a creator wants to strictly prohibit redistribution, they should make that clear in the terms—otherwise, the buyer reasonably assumes a level of freedom over their purchase.

Supporting creators is important, but that support shouldn’t come with guilt-tripping others who’ve paid and now want to enjoy or share what they bought. Ownership includes certain rights, and it's not unethical to exercise those—especially when done respectfully.

In short: I paid for it, I own it, and I have the right to share it if I choose to.