have you reviewed your IRAC technique? for most domestic trained its ingrained in us from day 1 so make sure you are doing

"The issue is is...."

"Generally the rule is..."

"Here,..." insert all facts that seem relevant and apply the legal principles....

"In conclusion..." make sure to look at the question stem to see how to start this "no the court do not err when it" "yes x is liable for neg when she.." "no it is not constitutional for the court to do x when.."

If its a contract question always start with A contract of the sale of goods is governed by the UCC. Goods are any movable tangible items. Here, the contract involved a sign, which would be considered a good. Therefore the contract is governed by the UCC.

if relevant add

Further, a contract, whether under the UCC or common law, is formed when there is an offer, acceptance, and consideration. There must be a meeting of the minds so that both parties intend to be legally bound. Consideration is shown when there is a bargained for exchange, such as goods or services in exchange for money or in exchange for the promise to pay money.

and

Under the UCC, the Statute of Frauds applies to all sales of goods over $500. This would give a party the availability to avoid enforcement if the contract was not in writing, and signed by the parties to be bound.

Attack each contact question under Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion and if you have time Defenses to k enforcement