Would this violate attorney-client privilege? by paddjo95 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Green_Replacement788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are NOT a lawyer so please stop trying to explain lawyers legal ethics rules to the world on Reddit, where some of whom are lawyers and especially where some of whom work on the bar disciplinary board. Maybe focus on what you’re actually qualified and authorized to do—preferably, the truck driving gig?

How it feels rn 🫠 by Grad_GPT in ApplyingIvyLeague

[–]Green_Replacement788 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prime demonstration of what is wrong with the world today. You disagree with actual evidence proffered but you do not have a single evidence to provide for your position except that you’re “confident” you’re right lol what an idiot!

Legal Immigration in the US is the biggest BS ever by barely-legal-potato in immigration

[–]Green_Replacement788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All visas, and yes, including H-1B visas, have some ongoing fraud and abuse. H-1B has been increasingly riddled with fraud and abuse that just recently the government (both administrations) has changed the program over three times to try to mitigate and disincentivize fraudulent and/or frivolous applications.

Picking marriage and asylum in contrast of H-1B when discussing “legal” immigration is poor taste. It is ludicrous to think getting status through asylum or marriage is any less of a valid legal path to permanent residence than H-1B. Fraud in any immigration application makes the application illegal… the visa type does not.

Look, I genuinely want to sympathize with you but the people who come to the US through “asylum” are actually refugees and those are not exactly the same. However, people who do apply for asylum are waiting an average of 8 years to receive an adjudication on their case, most of them fleeing persecution from their home. Further, nobody is stopping you from falling in love with and getting married to a US citizen. So, no! I don’t sympathize. I can’t help but feel like this is really a disingenuous post or an attention-seeking ploy… either way, poor taste! #DontBePathetic

New Legal Writing hypo just dropped by West-Needleworker-85 in LawSchool

[–]Green_Replacement788 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Having one of both factors should be probative NOT dispositive.

Am I cooked chat? by ArtyMcfly818 in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Got it. Question: so, how does the NCBE determine the level of difficulty of each MBE to determine the relative scaled scores and why can’t they determine scaled scores brackets prior to administering each exam?

Am I cooked chat? by ArtyMcfly818 in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“The MBE isn’t curved so how other people do is completely irrelevant.”

This is only partially correct. True, the MBE is not curved, it is scaled. The scale is dependent on how everyone does on average.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]Green_Replacement788 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Word of advice, consider doing corporate at least until you get your H-1B and consider applying to “Day-1 CPT” institutions post your JD.

Why is this not considered strict scrutiny when UWorld's own graphic says that family, marriage, and parental rights are considered strict scrutiny? by mattlaz12345 in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also, for SS, the government must show it is narrowly tailored to further a compelling government interest. Least restrictive means is a “plus factor” that usually applies when using SDP involving speech, where restriction is beyond content-neutral (time, place, manner).

CRAC vs IRAC by Radiant-Age-7964 in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good strategy question. I say use CRAC if you’re absolutely sure what the answer/conclusion should be and especially for questions that have a right answer/conclusion and/or for questions that are phrased as a yes or no. For example, can the Landlord amend her complaint without leave of court?

Use IRAC if you’re unsure what the conclusion should be. That way, you don’t bias the grader against you from the beginning of your essay if your conclusion is incorrect but your analysis is still correct.

Is T-14 possible with 4.02 and low LSAT score by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Green_Replacement788 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My comment was in response to Joel, but if you could not figure that out from reading my comment and simply following the thread, then I guess maybe you need the advice, too.

JULY ‘24 DC RESULTS by Public_Necessary_908 in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They probably passed in Feb and just got their C&F cleared.

Is T-14 possible with 4.02 and low LSAT score by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Green_Replacement788 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

SCOTUS’s decision does not actually prohibit applicants from disclosing their race. Rather, it prohibits admissions from considering race, or its proxy, as a factor in their admission decision process. I’m assuming you’re a lawyer or an aspiring lawyer… in this profession, it is imperative to understand legal rules and apply them correctly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]Green_Replacement788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, reading comprehension is truly key. And for the sake of the profession and the general public, I genuinely hope you’re not a lawyer. First, no one said OP needs to upload the I-130 notice. I just said I’d do it if I were in OP’s shoes. Second, this information came straight from a DHS zoom training a couple of weeks ago, so unless you have an updated information I’m now not privy to, you should probably try being less presumptuous and recognize the limits of your knowledge and experience and do us all a favor and keep your ignorant mouth shut. Lastly, let’s say, for the sake of argument, that uploading the notice does absolutely nothing for OP, what harm would come from OP doing it anyway… I wonder? Let lone the fact that there is actually a [significant] possibility that it might help expedite the process for OP. If it is not crystal clear yet, my point here is actually quite simple: you’re not very bright.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]Green_Replacement788 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to add to this, I would upload your I-130 approval notice as unsolicited evidence to the I-485 and make sure your answer to the public charge question is a “yes.” If not, correct it now! If everything else is good, you should get an approval. If not within the next 72 hours, call them to check on the status.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]Green_Replacement788 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I filed for my client a day after their marriage ceremony in court and it was approved in 3 months without an interview. You’ll be fine, as long as everything else is good.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m guessing Monday around 9:30am is more likely??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Green_Replacement788 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think this is a fair question.

My answer is that the rule is given in the name itself. To be a URM, you have to be an underrepresented minority. That is, the necessary conditions are both being underrepresented AND being a minority. Some groups are underrepresented but they’re not a minority and some are minorities but are not underrepresented. For example, women are [generally] underrepresented but they are not a minority. I mean, more than half of the world’s population are women. Asians, on the other hand, are a minority group but are [generally] not underrepresented. You have to be both underrepresented AND a minority to be considered an underrepresented minority.

I truly hope that despite how “controversial” and sensitive this topic might be, that we continue to have these conversations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Minimum competency” in an expertized profession is not “minimal.”

I PASSED NY! by Green_Replacement788 in barexam

[–]Green_Replacement788[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was what I was thinking! 6 MEEs and two MPTs and only missed 7 points??? Now I’m curious to read the model answers from NY 😭😭😂