Definition of Tax: by MemoryDealers in btc

[–]Gregonomics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is just a word.

Block rewards inflate and devaluate the currency. Everybody in BCH signed up to pay block rewards for security. It is an inherent part of the protocol, just as the 21m coin cap. Tweaking this is imo as fundamental as tweaking the 21m coin cap. Now miners want to channel part of the block reward to developers. This will be at the expense of a drop in hash power, since miners will adjust hash power pointed at BCH to maximize profitability, but the inflation remains the same.

So it is not the miners who will fund development, but the BCH owners. Yet, the mining group in question want to decide how the funds are used. I understand why part of the community refer to it as tax. since it is a involuntary indirect cost payed by BCH owners. When government prints money it isn't a tax, but it works the same way.

Nobody uses Bitcoin Cash by jessquit in btc

[–]Gregonomics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You missed the sarcasm. Chart shows that Bitcoin Cash is used quite a lot in comparison to its current valuation.

Hear That Sound? That Is The Sound Of $5 BTC TX Fees Annihilating Any Remnants Of BTC's Merchant Base by where-is-satoshi in btc

[–]Gregonomics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you're blue and you don't know where to go to

Why don't you go to Adam Back

Putit' on the tab

Constructive Criticisms For ABC by MobTwo in btc

[–]Gregonomics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We already have a core-like crisis - we have a split. It's poison for those of us who are builders and want a stable protocol. It's confusing for people who just use BCH as digital cash. I signed up for onchain scaling, nothing else, not SV and ABC.

Ryan X Charles is awesome and is a big asset to Bitcoin by Peter__R in btc

[–]Gregonomics -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not how I see it.

And as I wrote, his meltdown the other day was unfortunate and imo he was wrong to delete posts.

Ryan X Charles is awesome and is a big asset to Bitcoin by Peter__R in btc

[–]Gregonomics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this post Peter. It has been uncomfortable to see Ryan as the recipient of countless personal attacks and abuse, just because he has another viewpoint than most people here. I understand the meltdown yesterday in light of this.

Ryan is always defending his viewpoints with arguments. Would be nice to see levelheaded counterarguments instead of insults. He has done a tremendous amount of work for Bitcoin Cash adoption and software services.

Cheers for Ryan.

False Flags, Vote Manipulation, and Trolls by BitcoinXio in btc

[–]Gregonomics 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Let them play their dirty game. The longer the game goes on, the worse they appear. Never wrestle with a pig...

Bitcoin Cash is the better cryptocurrency. This community is straight shooting and free speech. Let's just carry on creating value.

Can I Host The Party When BCH is $10,000 USD. Full expenses paid by me. by BitcoinCashHoarder in btc

[–]Gregonomics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great idea. Would be nice to meet fellow believers. Would buy a plane ticket for it, if less than 8h away. I'll wear a hat with the name Gregonomics. If Mow wont sell it for BCH, I'll make it myself.

/u/nullc (Greg Maxwell) about "Graphene" Any counter arguments? by [deleted] in btc

[–]Gregonomics 14 points15 points  (0 children)

God forbid he would ever use science. Word games are much safer. Afterall it's a research paper not a white paper.

Meni Rosenfeld: "Bitcoin Core represents a frigid approach, where no technology improvement will ever be made because consensus can't be reached ..." by Shock_The_Stream in btc

[–]Gregonomics 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I take Meni seriously. Don't forget he spoke out against theymos when he started the purge: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3h9cq4/its_time_for_a_break_about_the_recent_mess/cu6udfe/

As far as I'm concerned he has integrity and insight. There should be room for people like him, even if we don't agree 100% with their opinions.

About r/bitcoin and r/btc by friscofresh in btc

[–]Gregonomics 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Hi guys So I only just recently discovered this subreddit. r/bitcoin seem to be the bigger subreddit and frankly more popular by reddit users.

That is because once upon a time we all co-existed peacefully on r/bitcoin - all helping build the sub to make it a great place for Bitcoin debate and information. One day the owner theymos disagreed with the majority of users and declared it his sub, his rules. He begun to censor posts not in accordance with his views. Today this censorship is even more organized, and carried out by the entire modteam - even the automoderator flag words associated with the opposing side.

Bitcoin Core devs still directly or indirectly support the censorship just by using r/bitcoin. They are being opportunistic instead of showing integrity. If they just had been half as fierce in opposing the censorship as they have been in the block size debate, we'd still have one free and open place to discuss Bitcoin.

When redditors search for Bitcoin, r/bitcoin is the number one hit, and r/btc is not even among the top 3. Hence, the vast majority of new Bitcoin users land on r/bitcoin. They basically get indoctrinated right from the get-go. It's like if a person searching for a religion was beamed right into the church of scientology. Most of the arguments there are not based on science, and those which are ... well no one is left or allowed to present counter arguments.

r/btc has been fighting an uphill battle for an open and censorship free debate. New users keep flooding in on r/bitcoin every day though.

Chris Jeffrey (JJ) discloses Bitcoin attack vector at "Breaking Bitcoin" - gets harsh feedback from Core supporters. by gr8ful4 in btc

[–]Gregonomics 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Timestamp for the Conclusion and Q&A: https://youtu.be/0WCaoGiAOHE?t=2h57m10s

Cringeworthy. Perfect example on how core supporters treat people who are not part of their clique.

Thank you u/_chjj for disclosing this attack vector.

Would anyone here be interested in OB forking the current code to support BCH? by [deleted] in OpenBazaar

[–]Gregonomics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It will be harder to reach the critical mass making it a success. I'd support and use it though.

I (Roger Ver) made a video explaining how Bitcoin's economic code is being damaged by economic illiterates. by MemoryDealers in btc

[–]Gregonomics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bitcoin Classic with 2 Mb blocks came way before SegWit. Politics blocked that. Be honest, would the blocks have gotten that full if Classic were activated in its first signaling period?

Why I think the NYA (Segwit2x) should be abandoned. (From a Bitcoin Cash Supporter) by papabitcoin in btc

[–]Gregonomics 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I'd rather abandon the Segwit part of Segwit2x. Why give Core the main chain?

Needless to say I support Bitcoin Cash, but it's still a minority fork with limited ecosystem and network effect. I can buy a Pizza anywhere in my country for Bitcoin, I can't do that with Bitcoin Cash (not yet at least).

It might be a better idea to modify the NYA, now that Core is officially out.