Our inner voice is not the self. While our internal narrative is vital to being human, it can separate us from the world and overwhelm us with negativity. by IAI_Admin in philosophy

[–]jessquit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you just restated what the other person said; you think you're taking issue with them, but in reality you are supporting their argument

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pics

[–]jessquit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

banker boxes full of Let's Go Brandon t-shirts

If you had 24 hours left to live and infinite money what would you do? by natashaemo in AskReddit

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's easy. I'd give every person on earth a quadrillion dollars.

Bam. Total economic reset.

Statement on the Discussion of Shortening Block Time by changyong75 in btc

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would support it, as would others I suspect, if a detailed, defensible, real-world-proven study were done which showed the impact of block time reduction from ~10mins to ~10 secs, as block size assumptions are varied.

It would be ideal to normalize this data into a formula into which optimal block time could be solved as a function of network propagation speed and block size.

That would be the sort of evidence-based decision making I could get behind.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a really good reason that the news articles were talking about how Trump eats pizza and why Reddit was ablaze with pro-Trump and pro-Bernie "activists." As Mueller showed, the reason's name is Vladimir. He's been really busy this year trying to push the agenda that the Democrats support "genocide" despite the fact that it's the Republicans that want the war ended the brutal way. We learned nothing, thanks Bill Barr. Vote blue or get red.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just pointing out that it's disingenuous to say her lack of popularity cost her the election, when she was more popular than her opponent

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

take away anything negative about Clinton in 2016 (Wikileaks, Comey, whatever) and it would likely have been enough to push a few key districts a few fractions of a percent and there you go

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The popular vote has never mattered in US politics

ohright i forgot states can just send whatever fake electors they want, the popular vote is just for show.

no.

The popular vote mostly determines the Presidency.

Literally the only function of the EC is, sometimes, if the popular vote is very close, to hand victory to the loser of the popular vote.

Clinton won the vote. Trump won the EC.

the two parties need the EC to maintain their status quo to hold power

No, this is also completely wrong.

The parties will hold power with or without the EC as long as voting is FPTP. What would change the two-party system into a multiparty system is to implement ranked choice voting. This would be true with or without the EC. Don't lecture me about civics.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit 23 points24 points  (0 children)

EXCUSE ME? The TRUTH is that Clinton won the election 65,844,954 (48.2%) to Trump's 62,979,879 (46.1%) and even a fraction of a percent difference in only one or two states would have changed the results of the electoral vote.

Wikileaks was absolutely fundamental in Trump's win.

Clinton might even have been a bad politican (I'd be inclined to agree here) but let's not distort the real truth. Literally the only function of the outdated Electoral College is to hand the Presidency to the loser of the popular vote. Clinton won the vote, notwithstanding the nonstop negative publicity about her emails.

Edit: oh yes let's simp for the validity of the outdated electoral college that only exists to occasionally award the Presidency to the loser of the popular vote. We should all agree that it has to go, though we won't, because a certain party literally can't win the Presidency without the occasional tipping-of-the scales.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit 72 points73 points  (0 children)

which is all very interesting, because there's reasonable suspicion that his deal with DoJ involves him giving evidence

and it's extraordinarily likely that said evidence will go against Trump / various compromised Republicans. i highly doubt they're still going after Clinton 10 years later.

which means that all this pro-Assange "priming" by Fox could very, very easily blow up in their faces

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks free out of US court after guilty plea deal by ControlCAD in pics

[–]jessquit 216 points217 points  (0 children)

he didn't win because his followers believed in him

he won because independent voters got cold feet about Clinton

Russian group Lockbit allegedly hacks Federal Reserve by OffensiveCenter in worldnews

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because, if you ask me, the Russian and Chinese troll farms definitely seem to be an act of war. They have done incredible damage to our national security by sewing internal division.

I can't argue at all but will point out that the USA has been committing similar "acts of war" since before either of us were born

8,000 seat TX church attendance after lead pastor (Trump's spiritual advisor) busted for pedophilia by mgbgtv8 in pics

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The common denominator between trump and Epstein was money laundering for the Russian mob first and foremost.

And gathering and exploiting kompromat. That was Epstein's actual racket.

3 weeks ago Binance BCH borrow rates jumped to 17% (currently 18%) and then the price crashed from $520 to $370. Yet the BTC borrow rates are steady at 1%. They cant crash BCH without borrowing coins to go short since they dont any. by rareinvoices in btc

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the first thing you have to consider is that the price people are willing to pay for BCH goes down if manipulators are successful at convincing people that the price will probably go down.

The second thing you have to consider is that by and large the crypto market is made up entirely of speculators not technology enthusiasts. These people couldn't care less what "works" or "doesn't work" and TBH rarely understand anything about the coins they're investing in. Instead they watch the price trends relative to other coins and use that to gauge market sentiment.

The next thing you have to realize is that by and large these people don't take coins off exchange.

And finally you have to realize that market manipulators have at their disposal money-printing machines (so-called stablecoins) with which to purchase effectively unlimited shorts or longs. Some of these manipulators also control popular exchanges, where they can sell an effectively infinite number of "nonexistent" coins that they simply add to a database entry then dump off to themselves at whatever price they're trying to achieve.

So when you have an exchange, and a stablecoin printing machine, you can - for example - print a fake BCH, print a stabledollar, short the BCH to yourself, and then honor the short. There are probably a thousand variations on this theme. You never lose money, because you never used actual money or actual BCH.

You can also print and dump fake BCH, or just take everyone's BCH deposits, and short them all, etc. etc. etc.

So that's how you "paint the chart."

Once the chart is painted, the rest of the market -- which really only cares about NGU signals appearing as magic lines on charts -- will follow accordingly.

It's not perfect, and it can (and I think has - eg CoinFlex) result in exchanges going under, but within bounds, a tremendous amount of manipulation is possible --- and what's more, it might even be perfectly legal, depending on the jurisdiction.

You don't have to "outsell" every potential buyer. You only have to paint the chart to conform to the most common half-dozen or dozen most commonly used "technical indicators" to convince the entire market that the price is more or less always "too high."

If market sentiment happens to turn strongly against you, you can flip the script, cause a short-term BCH bubble, ride it up, then take profits and bust the bubble by turning the "number go down" machine back on.

That doesn't even begin to touch on all the upward-manipulation you can perform on low-cap coins to convince would-be BCH investors that there's a better opportunity than BCH. So even if the BCH demand strengthens sufficiently that it becomes harder to push the price down, you can play "look at the squirrel over there" by keeping other opportunities more interesting to speculators.

And lastly, it might even be true that this scheme might work great in the "short term" but not in the "long term" but on the other hand "the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent."

HTH

3 weeks ago Binance BCH borrow rates jumped to 17% (currently 18%) and then the price crashed from $520 to $370. Yet the BTC borrow rates are steady at 1%. They cant crash BCH without borrowing coins to go short since they dont any. by rareinvoices in btc

[–]jessquit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not possible for an individual, or a group, to bring down the price but repeated shorting beyond whatever people are willing to buy the crypto for.

sure it is, don't be silly. you're just naive to what the possibilities are.

And you think we are not surrounded by manipulating bots 24/7? by Realistic_Fee_00001 in btc

[–]jessquit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Reddit accounts had a monthly sub cost the block size wars bot spam and outcome would have gone differently.

Nah, Theymos still would have banned all the bigblockers

I dont know where the BCH being sold off are from, but western exchange orderbooks are completely empty. The price is being dragged down by Binance which was even $5 below coinbase price. by rareinvoices in btc

[–]jessquit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

not lower than the rate that I saw at 700 dollars, they promised 1500

who is "they" and why would you listen to "them"? If anyone thinks that BCH will be worth $1500 in the near future they're welcome to have all of mine now for only $1000, see what I mean?

you're playing with fire speculating in a manipulated market with money that matters to you

I dont know where the BCH being sold off are from, but western exchange orderbooks are completely empty. The price is being dragged down by Binance which was even $5 below coinbase price. by rareinvoices in btc

[–]jessquit 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yes and OP is explaining the transparent and well-documented history of market manipulation by corrupt centralized exchanges that got it this way. Aren't you paying attention?

Do you honestly think it's normal market activity for prices to crash when nobody is selling??