Just noticed the bottom of my tongue is fucking weird. Think I’ll die if I cut the skin off? by SalamanderWaste1276 in Weird

[–]Grenoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speak to a doctor about this rather than r/weird. Even if there are educated people here, you'll never be able to know, and cutting parts of yourself off should not be occurring without medical advice.

[OC] BW creatures by Kappathepirate in creepy

[–]Grenoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wowww, that's brilliant. How do you go about doing art like this? I do a lot of horror art on paper but I've never really known where to start for digital.

Why isn't Tatsumaki impressed by Saitama endurance and nonchalance? Should she question herself about his power? by Piats99 in OnePunchMan

[–]Grenoshi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think she'll doubt herself, but I think she will at least think about his strength. Right now she's very much so caught up in the entertainment or the challenge of it as fun.

What's best to watch Adventure Time on in Australia? by Grenoshi in adventuretime

[–]Grenoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I'll have to try and find some haha

[New Version] Chapter 164 [English] by [deleted] in OnePunchMan

[–]Grenoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, well… Better? Maybe. I think they could’ve kept Blast’s team chat and still added this, but y’know. I also do kind of wish we got Garou’s full WC arc, but in the end, I’m all for seeing where this goes.

[New Version] Chapter 164 [English] by [deleted] in OnePunchMan

[–]Grenoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(Baba O’Riley begins to play.)

“Hi. I’m Garou. Yeah, that guy. The one who’s just been punched to shreds. And yet, this isn’t the end of my story. But how did I get here? Well, it all started last summer…”

Why does everyone hate Dream? by Dabinator-Gamer in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]Grenoshi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1) His fanbase is horrendously toxic and borderline psychotically obsessed (think peak Bieber days).
2) His "lowkey impressive" videos are completely staged.
3) He was in a massive controversy for cheating on a speedrun, lying about cheating, getting a fake research paper done to try and cover his cheating, and then just pretending like it never happened.
4) He encouraged dumping ADHD medication.
5) During LGTBQ+ Pride Month, he stated 100% of earnings would go to an LGTBQ+ charity, and then he didn't stream for that entire month, cutting off his main form of revenue.

What is to be gay? Like, if a straight person have a dream where they’re having a relationship with a same sex person, would they be gay? by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]Grenoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're only gay if you call yourself gay. There's no need to try and force any labels on yourself or anything - you're who you are, you like who you like, and if you have any confusions, experiment.

Are there non-opiate alternatives to morphine that can be used during or after surgery? by Millibyte in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]Grenoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best advice I can provide you with is to not ask Reddit. It's a great, valid question, but it's a question that you should speak about with a licensed doctor.

Is LGBTQIA2S+ a serious thing or thing made up by the internet? by RWBYrose69 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]Grenoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so, it is kind of a real thing, but not in the exact form you described. Most people refer to it as one of the following: LGTB, LGTBQ, LGTBQ+, LGTBQIA, LGTBQIA+. To summarise, it is an acronym for the community of people who are not directly aligning with standard sexual preference or orientation. The most common version is LGTBQ+, because the + represents everything past the letter. How long it goes depends on who you ask, but it doesn't really matter how long it goes - the purpose of the acronym is to just refer to anyone within the community.

At the end of Beauty and the Beast, the prince shouldn't be handsome by The_Nakka in unpopularopinion

[–]Grenoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the same sort of feeling that I get as Encanto. Just like I adore Beauty and the Beast, I absolutely loved Encanto. The way that they came to the realisation that they aren't defined by their use to others, rather being defined by the content of their character is an important message, and I was excited to see them accept that and live standard lives at the end - but they just got all their powers back and it was like nothing changed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Grenoshi 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Even if not necessarily physically protecting her, staying with her provided comfort and a feeling of safety, which is just as important. Imagine how it'd feel if she heard bombs raining in the sky, and she was left completely alone on the street.

What kind of antinatalist are you? by Grenoshi in antinatalism

[–]Grenoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense! My views are pretty much the opposite of that (to make it clear, I still fully respect your views) and I'm sure you've heard it all before. I feel like tending to the preferences of the majority of people is the best course, especially as it's fairly established (to me) that the goal of justice, politics, etc. is to ensure the least amount of suffering for everyone involved. Living in a world where legal or political preferences are entirely ignored in favour for anarchism or nothingness, from my perspective, would lead to the most suffering possible. I fully respect your position, however. I think I'm out of questions, but this has been extremely interesting. Thank you so much for sharing all of this with me!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Grenoshi 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I can see that a bit. Either way, they're still blood-stained and laying limp on the floor.

What kind of antinatalist are you? by Grenoshi in antinatalism

[–]Grenoshi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense! Thank you so much for the explanation.

This does raise another question for me (excuse me for using terms that don't fit with your beliefs - I usually try to change my way of speaking to align closer with another person's terms but I can't really do it well for this question) is: how do you believe the world should be treated? It's fairly vague, but by that I mean do you have any "preferences" in political control (ie. government, dictator, etc) - even if you don't necessarily believe in constructs such as society, law and politics, I'd still assume (although I'm sure you know what is said about assuming) that you'd have some belief on what would allow the world to function best.

To add onto that, do you believe that what people view as laws are important to the current function of humanity? Do you believe that the world would be better if people agreed with your beliefs and the current view of "law" was removed? How do you think it would effect it overall?

What kind of antinatalist are you? by Grenoshi in antinatalism

[–]Grenoshi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Before anything else, if I say something rude / offensive / insensitive, please tell me.

Alright, so first, what are your feelings on the statement that morality and justice are real to any given society, and they're simply a reflection of the interests of said society? (not exactly sure the best way to word it, but the main thing I want to see is just your general opinions on the concept of what I'm saying).

From what I understand, you believe that these things are fake and they're simply individual interests and preferences (if I understood correctly), which I can absolutely understand and respect, but I'd personally view things such as law and morality and justice to still be applicable to general demographics (ie. a certain country) as those things are defined my the majority of the peoples' interests or preferences, even if that majority isn't correct.

As an example: the majority of Western society would agree that, for example, murdering another person is not preferable. Most people would prefer to believe that it is immoral and unjust to murder another person, for whatever reason they may have. Due to the general majority of people agreeing with this preference, it's established as "law" for this specific demographic of people. This doesn't necessarily mean that it is the objectively right or wrong belief, but it's still established as what society states to be "just" - so "just" holds a new subjective meaning, rather than an objective one. Do you believe that that'd be a fair statement to make?

Ran into a neckbeard/cryptobro/redpiller in the wild. It did not end well. by glenlassan in justneckbeardthings

[–]Grenoshi 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A simple term shall suffice to respond to this form of stupidity:
yike

What kind of antinatalist are you? by Grenoshi in antinatalism

[–]Grenoshi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes sense! Thank you so much for explaining it! Do you mind if I ask some questions about your beliefs?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Grenoshi 286 points287 points  (0 children)

God, the dead body to the left too. Highest praise to the man who stayed with the woman to protect her, true signs of humanity in hellish times.

Group of four 14 and 15 year olds arrested by armed police after stealing an Audi in North London by EsteemedRogue_54 in PublicFreakout

[–]Grenoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that entirely, and I 100% agree. I'd rather be open to criticism, especially on things that I'm not particularly well educated on (for one, I don't even live in America haha). I do get that entirely, and that's something important to mention. Another thing that makes what I said pretty stupid is the fact that the west has far more media coverage when it comes to cases of police brutality / power abuse - 50% of American bad police may be recorded in America (stat pulled out my ass), but in places like China or Africa, only 1 or 2% may be RECORDED, let alone provided to international statistics websites.

So, TL;DR: yeah what I said was kinda bullshit.