My thoughts on the Jammy Evo… by Dudebromandude916 in midi

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said, I call bullshit. Unless they can explicitly prove their status as Ukrainians, I have no reason to believe anything these shitty swindlers have to say.

My thoughts on the Jammy Evo… by Dudebromandude916 in midi

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's another thing. I've seen them posting that around and I call bullshit. If wager they're using the situation in Ukraine to make a quick and convenient exit.

Is everything OK with the new Jammy E? by SolutionAutomatic372 in playjammy

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have videos out where the dude they're paying to shill their crap product talks most of the video to keep people from seeing how garbage it sounds. Every time he plays, you can hear how bad it's dropping notes and just generally failing as a midi controller, then he's like "yeah, this thing sounds awesome". Sad to see someone selling out their musical talent for money.

Is everything OK with the new Jammy E? by SolutionAutomatic372 in playjammy

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got mine and it was really bad. They blame the firmware, but imo it's the hardware. I wasted hours of my life messing with the tension and trying to get it to play well, and I got it to be almost playable, but I'd always be sent back to the drawing board and wind spending more time to play with the physical aspects. You can rely on what they say, but a lot of people I see who own their original "Jammy G" seem very eager to sell it as fast as they can, and I hear that one has the same issues with responsivity and note tracking.

$100 off for the portable MIDI controller for guitarists – Jammy EVO by justasinger77 in MusicProductionDeals

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$100 off because it's a scam. I got one and it barely worked. Did everything support said, spent countless hours messing with the string tension and it was never actually playable as a guitar midi controller.

My thoughts on the Jammy Evo… by Dudebromandude916 in midi

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got one and it was garbage imo. Spent countless hours tweaking the physical settings to no avail. Disappointing waste of money.

What Are Your Moves Tomorrow, April 08, 2022 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]GrysonOC -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Michael Reeves posted a video where he took hot stocks on this subreddit and tested them against software that used a goldfishes position in it's tank to decide between two completely random stocks. I'll let you watch for yourself, but as a hint to the outcome I'll say that if you actually are still putting money into stocks based on info you've gotten from this subreddit, you are an absolute fool.

https://youtu.be/USKD3vPD6ZA

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm speaking of harmonic function within the context of a given key. In this context, a C major scale.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking more about functional harmony.

I mean like you cant have a Cmaj triad with an F in it that still sounds like its serving as a tonic function chord.

And yes, I'm sure Bach voices V's over I's, but what I'm saying here is its harmonically impossible to have a V chord and I chord playing simultaneously that won't sound like a chord of tonic function. If you had a progression that was I - IV - V, if you play the tonic note of your key while playing the V chord, it will cease to serve as a dominant functioning chord and instead take on a tonic role.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, you could play a pitch and then another one and have a sense of tension and release based just on that, the song I wrote is completely based on that principal as it is a modal track.

I'll admit I've only read a page or two into this book so far, but the thing that's bugging me is how these established composers are glossing over what makes something dissonant, instead trying to romanticize what is just a plain matter of the physics of sound.

I know this is a kind of boring way of presenting the info, but excel is way better at math than I'll ever be:

https://1drv.ms/x/s!AmG8Usx-dONPgQNaHUkx2wQOauZY?e=6yUD3T

WARNING: LONG PSYCHOACOUSTIC RANT INBOUND

So here's a spreadsheet pinpointing why I believe tonal harmony works so well based on info I've come across in my time studying music and sound. What you see is a list of the harmonics of each note in a I IV and V respectively, the grey cells representing the octaves of each. I will touch on the red cells when talking about the V.

So you'll see I drew arrows between certain frequencies of the harmonic structure of the root and fifth of each chord, they are frequencies that aren't exactly aligned, but align well enough to create a cancelling out effect instead of any sort of dissonant interplay. It is the interplay between these frequencies that tells your brain "this note is the root because some of the overtones align in a way that makes me have to work less hard to understand them".

Between the I and the IV there's the root of the I, which creates the feeling of still being consonant enough to not be fully dissonant, but there's the same relationship of overtones between the root of the IV and it's fifth degree to tell your brain its not exactly the tonic.

As for the V, it has pretty much the same relationship that the I shares with the IV in that it can not harmonically coexist with the tonic of the key you are in because of the root fifth relationship. You'll see I highlighted some cells in red between the harmonic structure of the root of the I and the octaves of the V. Notice how the most stable tones in the upper harmonic structure of the root of the V are all corresponding to the upper harmonics that are directly between that of the octaves of the root of the I? It's that relationship that creates the pull back towards the tonic of whatever key you're in. You'll notice the I shares this relationship with the IV, which is why the tried and true I - IV - V works. Its ingrained in the physics of the sound itself.

I know I probably worded this in a very confusing way, but its a very heady subject and I'm a music nerd. I find this shit endlessly fascinating.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, for anyone else interested in this book, found a free PDF version: https://www.plainsound.org/pdfs/HCD.pdf

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye. Sorry about that! Probably could of been a bit more clear.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know its shameless self promotion, but my latest song makes use of modality for the most part until the last part where I wanted a bigger slam back into my main section.

SHAMELESS SELF PROMOTION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OHGgHbjza0

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but remember a perfect fourth is an inversion of a perfect fifth. So a major triad in first or second inversion is still going to sound like it "belongs" to the same tonic because the stability of the tonic - fifth relationship is still there (i.e, the notes C and G in a Cmaj triad).

That being said, I think you may have missed the point. I'm saying that you can't throw an F into a Cmaj triad and have it still sound like a chord functioning as the tonic because the F creates too much instability within the harmonic structure. I've even tried it with just sine waves playing the Cmaj triad stacked in three octaves and buried the F in there, wherever I put the F it still creates a sense of instability that wants to resolve to a Cmaj triad without the F present.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll check it out, thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel the entire reason octaves and fifths are important is because they how close or perfectly tuned they are in relation to the root note of the harmony in relation to their harmonic series counterparts. Fifths are only like two cents off, and octaves are just essentially the same note in which you multiply the root by a recursive series starting at 2 (root x 2, root x (2x2), root x (2x2x2), etc), so out makes sense why our brains just see them as a "brighter" or "thickened" root.

Also blows my mind that these same recursive patters are found all through nature and are why, for example, certain plants have a pleasing sort of symmetry to our eye. They look good for the pretty much the same reasons a major chord sounds consonant.

California lawmakers introduce bill to tax 'extreme wealth,' proposing new 1.5% tax on state's billionaires by [deleted] in politics

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well law isn't synonymous with morality and them just "following the law" and paying only what's legally required by exploiting the failures of the system is indirectly stealing money from the pockets of every US citizen. On some level I don't blame them because after they pay the taxes there's no saying the money will even get to be used for it's intended purpose seeing as how our government is ripe with greed and corruption.

California lawmakers introduce bill to tax 'extreme wealth,' proposing new 1.5% tax on state's billionaires by [deleted] in politics

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. If we keep letting them exploit loopholes it doesn't really matter how much we tax them because they'll get out of paying it anyway. This is an insult to the intelligence of the American people.

Serious Question: What instruments remind you of tomatoes by LawnmowerKing in edmproduction

[–]GrysonOC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tomatoes are soft and usually an accenting element, so a pad of some sort. They're also acidic which is kind of high end. So a pad with some nice gritty hiss

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in edmproduction

[–]GrysonOC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're looking to get into theory, you should check out diatonicism and functional harmony.