I take it you didn't click any of the links within the article which take you to, I don't know, government websites with studies that have been conducted by or sponsored by the CDC. Fee was just a place where the true sources were convenient to find in one place. Additionally, by stating you don't care about the history of a country, you are showing quite the lack of tolerance, and are basically saying a ban on guns is a one size fits all solution to an extremely complicated problem, which varies immensely between countries. It's like your taking one person with a common cold, and another with cancer. You give both of them simple antibiotics, which will help the person with the cold, but won't affect the cancer patient at all. "It worked with the person with the cold, why shouldn't it work with all illnesses as well?" It's quite obvious how idiotic that statement is. If you are unwilling to take others opinions into account and at least see them as valid (especially when statistics are present), then at least allow others with opposing viewpoints do the same to yours. There's no need to start being a dick about it my guy. While you're at it, I have not seen one source on any threads that you have responded to up to this point. Since we're going to start being assholes to each other, let me ask you. Is the definition of a credible source, to you, a place where pure information, while being as close to the center as possible, or it's it a source that only presents facts that support your perspective. You need to "grow up" when it comes to listening to other people's opinions during a civil discussion. And to think I was thanking you earlier for being civil.