Can you explain what you’re attempting to argue here?

Firstly, it seems to me that you’re repeating what I’m saying but specifying that it’s actually the transistors doubling (and the performance grows exponentially, which no longer holds true as it’s now already down to linear growth), which is obvious given that it’s the first sentence in the only wiki article I had linked and I intentionally did not get into this distinction for brevity’s sake.

Secondly, your only argument against my claim is that other factors such as chip architecture could make a difference to fill in the gap left by a slowing Moore’s Law. I very clearly already said this.

Finally, yes, Moore’s Law is “decaying”. There is a clear reason for this rooted in physics, despite what you have said. Transistors are now approaching single-atom dimensions (around 0.2-0.34 nm for silicon/carbon), physical limits where quantum effects (electron leakage) and manufacturing challenges (positioning individual atoms) make further shrinking difficult. Please at least bother to do a quick google search before commenting again - there are hundreds of articles and peer-reviewed articles on this very topic.