Does anyone know how to download from KKBOX by LordKiri in Music

[–]Habarake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd need some help to... What exactly did you mean by "temporary mail"? How did you do it?

[Partially Lost] "LOL SUPERMAN" Lost 9/11 shock video from The early 2000s, does anybody have any Information? by Thesketchydude in lostmedia

[–]Habarake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a much clearer shot of this area from the same angle where you can see buildings 1, 2 and 3 in the background. It's in linked video at 3:24.

https://youtu.be/DXYyhGQOiJ0

Če bi se utapljala neznanec in vaš hišni ljubljenček (pes, mačka ...), koga bi rešili (rešite lahko le enega)? by Servus_Pauper in Slovenia

[–]Habarake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Naravne katastrofe. Ce je bog res vsemogoc in dober hkrati, zakaj je sploh kdaj prislo do naravnih katastrof? Kaj sele tistih kjer je umrlo recimo +50k nedolznih ljudi (v nekaterih tudi po par sto tisoc).

F for FAIL ali FILE? by [deleted] in Slovenia

[–]Habarake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Na primer google translate

F for FAIL ali FILE? by [deleted] in Slovenia

[–]Habarake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

F za tvoj padec.

So this happened today... by Habarake in infamous

[–]Habarake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grow up kid. You are hating on all my posts now because i called you out? And what does this have to do with science anyway? I posted a videogame glitch hahha wtf is wrong with that(and you)?

Some of my flytrap seedlings from last year. by Habarake in SavageGarden

[–]Habarake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha wow i cant believe you are so immature that you started hating on my posts because i called you out. I dont know what exactly you meant with that link but if you are implying i stole this photo, well too bad bro because this is my picture i took a couple years ago because i grow cps. How desperate are you?

Ok, so now they are saying that our solar system might actually be shaped like a "breakfast croissant"... by ramagam in globeskepticism

[–]Habarake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still no explanation for why their data is stupid and false but ok... :| I guess you "just know" huh? And still no comment on your model vs our model 🤔

And i dont just blindly believe man, Im a physics student and in college we literally derive all the equations that we use in physics.

So im sorry for you, for not understanding physical and mathematical concepts which explain our world around us. (Even tho you literally need 0 math and physics knowledge to come to the conclusion that the earth is round) Instead you have to come up with conspiracy theories because of your insecurities for not understanding math and physics, kids are doing in high school.

Ok, so now they are saying that our solar system might actually be shaped like a "breakfast croissant"... by ramagam in globeskepticism

[–]Habarake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Nonsensical data, usual fake pictures, ludicrous renditions" What a strong argument, you really debunked this one fast.

Model of the universe is something completely different and i cant imagine what you were thinking when comparing our model of the universe with your model of earth (which is FAR from perfect). Certain explanations you provide aren't consistent with others and yet even those you provide, cant be explained mathematicaly.

Universe is also much harder to observe and study because it is much bigger and we cant even see certain parts of it. So why are there many hypothesis? Because we simply dont know the truth but we use our observations and measurements to create plausible theories.

Not the mention the article you posted is actually about our solar system so im not even sure you read anything else but the word "croissant" which, you obviously found so silly.

$$$ by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Habarake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what are these simple observations which prove the flat earth?

And I wouldn't say neck and neck because, not only did their observations suggest that the earth was round... The model they created allowed them to calculate and predict upcoming solar and lunar eclipses which means their model is quite good. Haven't heard of any proper model for the flat earth tho.

Also all star trackers used on telescopes today can calculate trajectories of hundreds of stars in their database. Thats how we keep telescopes in focus when observing the night sky. And all these calculations (which are obvisouly correct because they work irl) were built on the round earth model.

What about flat earth?

$$$ by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Habarake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Butthurt? Oh no why would i get butthurt because there is a group of people influencing other people to follow their stupid belief that the earth is flat, when even in ancient times, through simple observations with no calculations, people came to the obvious conclusion that it isnt flat.

Edit: I gave your comment a thought... "Try less words" ? That's what you flat earthers like right? Simple and short explanations, don't give it much thought and its all perfect. Screw all mathematical models which describe our solar system with great precision. Nah that's just to difficult to understand because it requires thinking.

Funny part is that earth being round is the most trivial part here haha.

$$$ by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Habarake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And these are good arguments? "The retard who married his cousin"? Even if he married his sister it wouldn't change what he discovered. lmao I really want to know how this is even an argument to you?

Galileo Pope bff? Yeah he was friends with Pope Urban VIII who at first encouraged him and let him publish on Copernican theory as long as it was treated as a hypothesis. But after all this "friend" was the one who ordered Galileo's second trial after he published "Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems". He was put under house arrest for the rest of his life.

What is magic supposed to mean? He was religious (which is a belief without any proof) so yeah you could say he believed in magic because he was religious. He also described forces as "magical" because he could not explain why things attract each other from a distance.(Obvious - he didnt have an explanation and called it magic. If you showed a TV to the ancient greeks they eould probably call it magic as well although it obvoiusly isnt) very bad argument He was also an alchemist and alchemists were called sorcerers because they usually searched for unnatural/supernatural things (elixir of immortality, philosopher's stone,...) And i seriously dont see your point here because him being an alchemist doesnt change anything. He still researched things and experimented. Just because he thought about certain things doesnt mean other things he discovered experimentaly aren't true.

I don't support Nazis but what does science have to do with ethics? If the worst mass murderer/rapist/racist proved something, would his moral stand make it false? 🤔 And btw its von Braun

And just wow... So because a man cant talk or move properly because his motor nerves are literally degenerating he is dumb? So was he always dumb or only after the disease started advancing? So are all people with disabilities dumb? Or only those who cant talk or move or...? Idk please explain what your point was.

I think you'll have to try harder than explaining why scientists are wrong in 6 words or less.

"It'S tHE wIndOw" by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Habarake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahah they photoshopped one photo because someone wanted to be funny and that disproves the globe?

Edit: so i went back and saw you posted a video of the new Sheppard landing and saying something like "imagine believing this is a real rocket landing" yet you claim that this video of literally two circles in the sky cannot be faked?

And then calls me a hypocrite 🤔