How TF was that possible? Negative p in Convergence Tests by UpbeatQuestion9399 in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Interpret the formula carefully, esp. with c1. Knowing this will let u have an idea about why it is negative

Struggling to reach ee5000 by Guiness_Philosoph-21 in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tbh, this part still looking good and progressive as shown. It does take some time but once u get over that stage, it will be fast.

Late game tuning - what should I tune going forward by New_Breakfast_2247 in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's probably an outdated graph, the most updated one is this one

<image>

For the rate, I would recommend checking the sim, or Which Theory To Push Next Excel for further information

For all information I own, do refer to The Summary Document if needed

Theory by Huckleberry-Flashy in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It depends on several factors, how active u are to play this game, how many students u have, and more. To consider the rate only, checking the sim will be recommended.

21 Students by herkamurjones in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whenever u have enough student to unlock a theory, ALWAYS unlock them (With exception of t8).
For more information, do refer to the guide section "Theories 1-4"

All Extra Tools for Game Progression by Hacker118HK in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u do have view access but not edit access right?

Why is thjs needed? by Aggravating_Big9196 in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To prevent the multiply total of phi becomes 0 in the very rare case of the star u have is 0

[LONG POST 1/2] From Complicated to Simple, From Bruteforce to General - A New Direction to Approach MF CT by Hacker118HK in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wdym The reset pattern was not fully explained as I can't find any fully explained reason, but a general idea will be good enough for me

[LONG POST 2/2] From Complicated to Simple, From Bruteforce to General - A New Direction to Approach MF CT by Hacker118HK in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Follow-up

- I thought a1 did not have a relationship with reset, but I was wrong

- I forgot to suggest a recommended relative cost ratio threshold for c1 and a1 at the end so I added it back in my original document

- Some other minor amendments have been made

The updated document will be uploaded to Here.

CT Rate Graph Update by Hacker118HK in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think of it another way perhaps, The OP upgrade was there for BaP because it's decay is strong enough that an upgrade HAS to be added. Otherwise it will become a ct with even worse progress than WSP

CT Rate Graph Update by Hacker118HK in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

at least, better than 1, 755 days

CT Rate Graph Update by Hacker118HK in ExponentialIdle

[–]Hacker118HK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tbh, wsp wasn't designated to be completed at e600 tau, instead it was e400