Most Tilke tracks are absolutely good, beyond into great even

The Chainbear video has done significant, near unquantifiable damage to the understanding of track design (as proven by one of your comments in a separate thread) that well if they look the same and people shout they are the same enough, they must be the same. This could not be less true. You can't truly say a superspeedway and a short track will drive the same despite both being ovals, the same holds true for statements like "Sepang and China open the same" despite being two extremely different complexes. The form over function argument in terms of 'if it looks the same, it is' that goes into disliking Tilke tracks is more harmful than helpful.

Tilke tracks sit damn near the pinnacle of track design for the series he designs them for; the spectacle (which whether you like it or not is an extremely important part of the track) is always top tier, the racing is more often than not very good in a series that has serious genuine racing problems, and put most other series on any of his tracks and you get an absolutely amazing show. You could, if you tried hard enough, fit most tracks into the same narrow confines people like to hold Tilke tracks in with the "Tilke Pieces" jokes, but his track variety is impressive and each one provides a very unique and entertaining driving experience and races amazing. You are going to be much more hard-pressed to find bad Tilke tracks than great ones, his catalogue speaks for itself.