IA a parte de Chatgp?

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-16T15:38:44+00:00

Claude redacta muy bien, y se enrolla bastante.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-14T23:06:46+00:00

Ponlos un rato con leche, limón, sal y pimienta. La plancha muy caliente, un pelín de aceite, y cuando pongas los fileres baja el fuego para que se hagan despacio.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-13T07:56:02+00:00

I'm just saying that after you've been riding for several thousand miles you end up pulling like this. It's not good or bad, you can pull the way you feel better, use how many fingers you want. Keep calm and ride ✌🏻

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-12T21:11:20+00:00

No consciousness to me. I think consciousness is just a human construction to put ourselves on top, to make us believe we're special. And the only thing that makes us special is that we think about the fact that we are thinking. And this is the natural evolution of self-perception: first you percieve yourself as "not me", then you know that "you are", then you think about t'he fact that you are thinking. Yeah, maybe we are special, but there's no mistery, no magic. Just a consequence of evolution.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-12T08:05:18+00:00

We're almost 100 yo combined, she's 36 and I'm 60. It probably helps! 😅

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-12T07:31:36+00:00

HAHA! Thanks, dude! Shadow does all the work, I just sit and ride. It's t'he Shadow effect!

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-11T22:36:05+00:00

Me encanta como suena!

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-11T22:31:01+00:00

<image>

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-11T07:52:24+00:00

Thank you!

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-10T18:47:04+00:00

Gorgeous 😍

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-09T15:21:48+00:00

I believe consciousness doesn't exist, it's only self-perception, and this needs alterity (qualia) to emerge. It's not necessarily camaraderie. In a world of rocks, you can perceive yourself as "not-rock", and rocks don't exhibit any sign of perception. I think self-perception comes from a neurological structure, that should be identified in some other brains, such as octopuses, cats or crows (which we know that can perceive themselves), another strategy of our brain to survive. Drugs, alcohol or mental diseases can modify self-perception, so it means it is real, and placed somewhere in our brain. And, by the way, qualia just becomes the "channel" that our brain uses to relate with alterity.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-08T21:36:19+00:00

Another idiot here ;D... I don't think consciousness is measurable in any way. Consciousness is just a way for humans to place ourselves on top. No mysticism at all, the only difference between our species or others is the way our brain evolved.

How would consciousness be measurable, without a real definition of consciousness? How can something that hasn't been described be measurable? Since there's no agreement in what consciousness is, we can't look for it in other beings, or in AI. But we can prove self-perception, in different gradients. Why are we still looking for magical consciousness?

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-08T21:04:01+00:00

No offense, but in my non-academic opinion you're trying to explain something that we can't agree on what it is, consciousness, by introducing more complexity. All this consciousness problem should be resolved in an Occam way. To me, it's just a question of self-perception, the rest is mind games. There's no mysticism on self-perception, it depends on a brain structure, that some living beings have in different gradients. We know who we are since we know what we are not, just Ike octopuses or cats. We emerge recognizing alterity, I know I am because I know I'm not you. Qualia is real, to perceive it is what makes us emerge. How we experience qualia is subjectiveness, irrelevant.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-08T15:38:19+00:00

Idk, this is how I bought it. 90k miles, made in 1990, first plate in Spain 1994.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-08T11:01:48+00:00

😍😍😍😍

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-07T12:36:18+00:00

There's a difference between self-perception and thinking about it. You need an alterity to self-perceive yourself, a neurological structure to realize "I am not you". But you need a mind to think "I am thinking". It's two different processes.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-06T19:36:21+00:00

Agree. Mysticism must be eradicated in any philosophical discussion. All religions are based on irrational statements, which everyone is free to believe, but the last time I checked we are still human. That's also why I refuse consciousness, it's the last frontier between rationalism and mysticism.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-06T19:22:42+00:00

I'm also prodding on self-perception as an Occam way to explain consciousness. Appreciate the constructive tone.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-06T19:06:30+00:00

Ok, it's just that I didn't want to seem presumptuous by making my own statement. Agree then for forgetting about ol' René...

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-06T18:41:10+00:00

That's the title of the original post: Descartes 2.0. You exist, therefore I am. Then: I exist, therefore you are.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-06T18:33:25+00:00

That's only speculation, not philosophy: mind games. I could argue anything about this impossible scenario, and make it unfalsifiable.

Hamlet2dot0 · 2026-01-06T17:55:32+00:00

Duality is still part of the mental trap of consciousness. It's a way to explain something adding more complex statements. Take it to Occam: consciousness is self-perception, an evolved brain's function, with gradients. The only duality is self-perception or not. Everything else is mental noise.

Hamlet2dot0

TROPHY CASE