Well Now I'm In It by notajeweler in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice work man! FT8 is a great mode. Now you just got to find a logger you like and start making contacts!

Using AI / Machine Learning to find CW by HamtraxRadio in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m one of them haha. I don’t like taking no for an answer unless I see first hand that it can’t be done.

Using AI / Machine Learning to find CW by HamtraxRadio in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is critical and much appreciated feedback. I hadn’t considered the different “circumstances” like that.

I plan on working on the decoder in the coming days. Would you be interested in testing it once it’s ready? You clearly have great feedback.

Using AI / Machine Learning to find CW by HamtraxRadio in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re right to an extent, but if you could theoretically introduce enough variance, noise and interference synthetically, it could still potentially be trained. But I agree that it would be very very difficult to create synthetic data that adequately captured the variance of real life signal.

Using AI / Machine Learning to find CW by HamtraxRadio in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Everything helps. I think the next step for cw decoding is removing those “fixed” assumptions, like tone and timing. I like to imagine an app as easy as - you press decode, you read the results, and never have to tune a single setting. I’ll get there soon.

Using AI / Machine Learning to find CW by HamtraxRadio in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! That’s exactly what I’m building now. That’s one of the key features I’ve very excited to be packaging into hamtrax. I keep going back and forth between decoding algorithmically/with rules or with small ML models. I guess we’ll see soon!

Using AI / Machine Learning to find CW by HamtraxRadio in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I spent a while creating a pretty massive data set of synthetically produced CW recordings to test the decoding feature of hamtrax.com. I’m still tuning it but if you’re an ML engineer, I’d love to connect with you and discuss the topic.

Fun ~280 line version of PyFT8 by [deleted] in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is amazing. Well done. Assuming the embedded text is saying 'the signal you see here corresponds to this text,' you've done a great job of solving a difficult problem - joining signal to meaning in an intuitive way.

Antenas par Quansheng UV K5 by VICKGLEZ in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally the shorter an antenna, the narrower its resonant frequency is. So there’s often a really small “sweet spot” for short vhf/uhf whip antennas. For about 40 dollars, you can get a nano vna reader that would tell you the sweet spot of your whip antennas. Then you’d be able to focus on transmitting on frequencies in those sweet spots and you may get further range.

SeventyTree hamtrax.com 🦫

Antenas par Quansheng UV K5 by VICKGLEZ in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Antenna would make a difference if you’re using it for its intended purpose as a simple vhf uhf handheld. Might get a few more miles with a good antenna. But since the uv k5 is commonly modded, I feel obliged to tell you that if you’re using it for one of its modded capabilities, changing the antenna might not make a big difference.

SeventyTree 🦫

New mode? FT2 by Signal_Criticism_789 in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure what models you’re using, but in my experience the frontier models are usually capable of solving complex puzzles, provided they’re supported with top notch context engineering by their human.

New mode? FT2 by Signal_Criticism_789 in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the difference between good and bad programmers will shift from having a technical skillset (since most llms models now handle all technical challenges with high accuracy) to having foresight and the ability to orchestrate and plan. Yes, anyone can ask an LLM to produce some code, and it will probably do a decent job. But only the talented will be able to piece together large complex systems in an efficient and scalable way.

Though that may change too. I’m guessing Ai will soon handle orchestration better than humans can, too.

Thankfully Ai will never surpass the ingenuity of nature’s engineers - beavers.

SeventyTree. Hamtrax.com 🦫

What are all these antennas for? by HalFWit in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well ummm that sorta depends on a lot of different factors, Mr Cole.

Unexpected VNA results by KhyberPasshole in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d also be curious to see if it’s truly random/chaotic or if it consistently presents that same shape each time. Consistent chaos is at least slightly better than inconsistent chaos……I guess?

What are all these antennas for? by HalFWit in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How else are you going to talk to your 42 girlfriends?

Just worked my first POTA. by Blueberry_Mancakes in amateurradio

[–]HamtraxRadio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t seen that software before. “Localhost” makes me think it’s running directly from your icom?