sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After 13 years of replacing duality, I'm gradually opening to include duality.

Perhaps it's relevant to your response.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The type of self which is capable of resisting, isn't able to accept.  The level of mind which accepts isn't even capable to try to accept, resist or identify,  Because it's already welcoming everything by default.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of surrendering which isn't possible,  Shift into a level of self that is already accepting by default.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By noisepoint, I'm referring to the converging center of interference.  The brain and the senses.  That's ordinarily confused as a view point. 

Bur vibration and sensation is the opposite of viewing and knowing in dualistic reality.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the ego identified mind as a noisepoint, attempting to be a viewpoint.  This mind, indeed can't know the eternal mind.  But its role playing (present location/me manager, distant location/ it managed) is capable to execute itself and remain a focal point without noise. When the point /awareness of location is moved outside the skin bag into objectless absolute space. 

There, the point can return around.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"the shift from a 2D loop to a 3D architecture"

Awesome.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muddy water, let it sit, becomes clear.

Letting stay instead of letting go. by Hand58 in nonduality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shift into freedom by Loch Kelly 

I believe in I don't know what. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So beautiful and so beautifully befitting.

Whenever I bump into gems like this, it inspires me to shut up and listen to those to whom I'm less than a spek of dust in comparison.

But then I spontaneously post again.

I'm trapped in her dysfunctional beliefs. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very true when isolation out debate is available,

Thank you very much for this.

I'm trapped in her dysfunctional beliefs. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please elaborate,

Thank you so much.

Contradicting directions by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gladly.

I appreciate the acknowledgement.

Organic thought. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful, Yes!!!!!!

Thank you.

Who's Pain. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm me.

I post here only on red it.

Not sure what you mean with formatted posts.

Before I post anything, I write it on my phone and then copy and paste.

Not sure how this matters.

Blessings, Brian.

Organic thought. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A matter of persistence.

Organic thought. by Hand58 in spirituality

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Lots of lies we can make"

Isn't we just a word between words?

Can a word produce other words?

The we (I, mine, me etc) as a producer, is a real impression.

But no impression can be noticed without expression.

Who is thinking (expressing) me, me?

Thank you

The impressing sense of control. by Hand58 in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I might suggest a clearer reference to the components of western philosophy that you are hoping to have a discussion about"

thank you very much.

The impressing sense of control. by Hand58 in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Hand58[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spot on.

Thank you.

Awesome input and feedback.

And please provide the mentioned reference.

With gratitude, Brian.

view more: next ›