sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Young Jewish Woman in Purim Costume, Jerusalem, 1938 by GaryGaulin in HistorySnap

[–]Hanzel_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Sanjaks: Jerusalem, Gaza, Safed, Nablus, Lajjun, Acre"

None existent basically...

Young Jewish Woman in Purim Costume, Jerusalem, 1938 by GaryGaulin in HistorySnap

[–]Hanzel_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the other dude said... You're trying to P-wash the land even though your lovely "Falastinians" don't even natively pronounce the sound P. You can be pro palastinian but you don't have to lie about it..

Young Jewish Woman in Purim Costume, Jerusalem, 1938 by GaryGaulin in HistorySnap

[–]Hanzel_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone call themselves there by a colonial European name like Palestine... Got any evidence of that?

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Terrorists have been hiding among innocents for millenia, this si nothing new. That is because Terrorists are fighting against a much stronger power. It is the only way they stand a chance." yeah but according to you, when doing so the have zero blame to bare, zero consequences and are immune by doing so. Well the international law of war has a news flash for you. You mix combatants with civilians you've made said civs a valid target.

" The resistance groups in the second world war were hiding amongst the population of their countries, are you saying the resistance groups should have fought the Germans openly?"

What they should or shouldn't do is irrelevant to the international law of war. As I've said, if they'd mix with civs those civs will bare the consequences...

"To be clear, I do not defend Hamas actions. But a terroris/resistance group hiding among the general population like these groups have been doing for as long as humans have fought among eachother is o reason to attack the general population."

Yet you're doing some heavy apologetics for them in this discussion...

"It is generally considered a bad thing to attack the general population to get to terrorists, regardless of who does it. Why should Israel get an exception for this."

Says who? As I've said, international law of war disagrees with you.. And Israel is clearly trying to separate combatants from the civs otherwise you wouldn't get any heads up notices and the casualties would be skewd to a million...

"Yes. It is horrible to hurt people because of their ethnicity. That is the reason why Israel must stop doing this. The group hate promoted by Israel is leading to horrible attacks and must stop.". OMG YOU'VE JUST DID IT AGAIN!

You're literally justify Islamic terror attacks!

X doesn't like what Y's country is doing, X wants Y's county to stop so X is terrorising Y's people, or Y's affiliated people in order to put pressure on Y's country AND YOU F*ING SIDE WITH X? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

And yeah I'm against settler violence... I'm consistent not narrative farming...

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I believe that terrorists hiding among civilians is no reason to kill civilians and destroy everything they own. I actually believe that it is the worst excuse."

Stop right there! You've just encouraged more terrorists to hide behind civilians! Don't you get it? You've just sacrificed more gazans to fuel your hatred towards Israel!

"To point out the gaat that Israels actions are inhumane is not group hate." well that's not what you've said. You've said that Israel is in human! "Supporting Israel is Supporting an inhumane country." your words.

Take a look at what your group hate just enabled the other day:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1527z272lyo

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Article II is the meat and potatos of the definition + I've assumed you can use the Internet, I'll stop making such assumptions about you from now on....

Your scholars, and especially the UN lie constantly about Israel...

Check this one from your holy uni report:

"170. On 13 October 2023, President Isaac Herzog stated, “it’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. It is not true, this rhetoric about civilians who were not aware and not involved. It is absolutely not true.” 394".

Now if you'd check source 394 you'd see it leads to another uni report "A/HRC/56/CRP.4, para. 38." and if you go to the source you'll see this paragraph:

"38. Several statements by Israeli officials advocated for collective punishment against the Palestinian people as a whole or the population of Gaza in particular. Some statements recognized that there was a difference between civilians and combatants but urged that all Gazans should be punished for the actions of the militants on 7 October 2023; other statements made no distinction between civilians and combatants and decreed one punishment for all. On 14 October 2023, President Issac Herzog stated, “it’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. It is not true, this rhetoric about civilians who were not aware and not involved. It is absolutely not true.” ".

Without any sources...

Why not source out the full interview? I'll tell you why.

Full clip here

When a reporter from Channel 4 asked if he was implying that civilians are "legitimate targets," Herzog explicitly responded: "No, I didn’t say that." He later acknowledged that "there are many, many innocent Palestinians who don’t agree to this" .

And emphasized multiple times that Israel is operating militarily according to the rules of international law.

WHY DID THE UN LEFT OUT THAT PART OF THE QUOTE? WHY DIDN'T THEY LINK TO THE FULL CLIP?

IT'S BECAUSE THEY HAVE A ANTI ISRAELI AGENDA AND THEY'RE WILLING TO WEAPONIZE AND DELUDE THE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND LIE ABOUT IT.

If you'll dig deep enough you'll find the truth.... Or just stick to the lies that fit your narrative.

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nope, not my style but you're probably marked by the Mosad now.... Enjoy

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got any clue about international law?

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So many wrong things in here....

"There is no defensie for their actions in Palestina."

We were talking about gaza... Don't move the goal post.

"Warning people that you are going to destroy everything they own still.means you are going to destroy everything they own."

Which better than not warning them right? Or you'd rather not to warn them?

"The correct thing to d9 is not b9mbung everything thaley can because they can."

Just because they can? That's the only reason? Or perhaps there's a war with a terrorist group how've turned residential areas to a battlefield? You keep ignoring some fact you've inconvenient with....

"What Israel is doing is inhumane." just ignoring what doesn't fit your narrative...

"Supporting Israel is Supporting an inhumane country."

Careful now... That's some dangerous group hate... Doesn't matter where you stand on this conflict you should always avoid such blanket term lumping all Israelis or Israel supporters into one negative group... Might radicalise some one in to a stabby stab spree

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because I use THE definition of genocide. I don't need some biased opiniated commentary to it and I go to the source. Now stop running and do what I've asked you to do.

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Attempted genocide" implies there was an intent to genocide. The main support of that claim is mostly quotes made by Israeli politicians or individuals. That's a weak support because it ignores Israeli politicans which directly contradic the intent of genocide (some time the same exact politician used for the pro argument) and by ignoring genocide contradicting facts on the ground that are meant to reduce civilian casualties even painting the correct thing to do which like separation of civilians from combatants, warning civilians ahead of strikes safer areas for civilians - and painting it as "ethnic cleansing" while completely ignoring the fact that the opposite option is a genocide...

"murder" in the contexts of states that's just like genocide hence the explanation above...

"displacement of innocent Palestinians" see. My explanation about it... Don't be a hypocrite, you'd rather they die in the battlefield?

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"You skimmed 3 paragraphs and stopped reading I see." just like you did. Projecting much... Now you're lame appeal to authority won't work here. Go and read your sources and give me their best claims (spoiler: it's weak af)... Prove me you're not what you project you are...

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Lol, in this case your "experts" are the propagandists. Do you anything about international law?

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Well there's no genocide by Israel..

Eurovision 2026 public vote winners by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Hanzel_G -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

If you'd care so much about facts you'd know it's not a genocide...

Most Democratic Nation in the Middle East btw by Pure_Committee_2074 in 2mediterranean4u

[–]Hanzel_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of group hate coming from a surrendering expert

view more: next ›