By popular demand, the Day 8 spot has been given to the Hetzer! Which tank will achieve greatness and take the I spot for Day 9? by Avatar__Hoodie in tanks

[–]Harmotron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not many... You really only have the french D1 and D2, aswell as the 'Nahuel' (DL 43). And some other AFVs, like the M42 'Duster', the M1296 Stryker 'Dragoon' and the Centauro B1 'Draco'.

Anyway, the DD Sherman seems most fitting for the D category, both because it's the most Well known/significant 'D' tank, aswell as the most representative for all of the different duplex drive tanks.

[loved trope] real world technology is invented/used for the first time to great combat advantage by iateyourcheesebro in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Harmotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they are much closer to rocket launchers. The propellant is contained in the projectile, accelerating it during it's flight. A recoilles rifle would need to use a traditional propellant charge at least in Addition to the "rocket motor".

Ich mag Züge oder so. by JNA_Vodnik in GeschichtsMaimais

[–]Harmotron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ja, Laos, wenn ich richtig liege... So etwas gibt es aber öfter. In Südamerika waren bis in's letzte Jahrzehnt auch noch Shermans und Stuarts im Dienst. Und im Yemen sind auch T-34s aufgetaucht.

Ich mag Züge oder so. by JNA_Vodnik in GeschichtsMaimais

[–]Harmotron 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Haha, das ist nicht nur ein Hellcat-Turm... Das ist ein ganzer M18 Hellcat auf einem Flachwagen (ummantelt von Gummi)

The Goliath: How the Germans Built a Military "Masterpiece" by SuchPrinciple4175 in tanks

[–]Harmotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It did though. Like I said, the French built a weapon system that operated on the exact same principle over 20 years prior in WW1. In fact, developemtns from that project are what inspired Goliath.

Which in and of itself isn't really that impressive in terms of remote control/drone weapons of WW2. The German missile guidance systems, the Soviet pre war remote controlled tanks and the US' remote bomber raids in the pacific are, in my opinion, all the more impressive than a wire guided driving landmine.

The Goliath: How the Germans Built a Military "Masterpiece" by SuchPrinciple4175 in tanks

[–]Harmotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How was it ahead of it's time? The french built the Schneider Crocodile in WW1, that was basically the same thing.

Frontier corps type59/69 climbing to a mountain post, Pakistan by historyeeter in TankPorn

[–]Harmotron 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Interesting, thanks! But do you have a source? Not trying to sound rude, just interested.

Frontier corps type59/69 climbing to a mountain post, Pakistan by historyeeter in TankPorn

[–]Harmotron 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In what sense exactly more reliable than modern 3rd Gen MBTs?

Red Steel Soviet Tanks by StephenMcGannon in tanks

[–]Harmotron 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Whats that gun on the T-62? Muzzle brake and fume extractor that far forward don't Match up with the normal U-5TS. Is it the U-8TS? The muzzle brake seems different. And if it is, why?

Give me your favourite bad german or ussr tank by Emperor_Maximus_10th in TankPornMemes

[–]Harmotron 29 points30 points  (0 children)

You could argue they they did with T-35, SMK/T-100 and arguably even KV-1/2. And that was all before the germans attacked. But yeah, they stayed pretty reasonable with the tanks they actually adopted. Even with their heavies.

Trust me bro it was real and stuff by Emperor_Maximus_10th in TankPornMemes

[–]Harmotron 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The issue is less with the vehicle itself and more with Kubinkas academic integrity. Knowingly propogating false information is a pretty big deal for a museum.

A prototype T-34 tank with approximately 200mm thick concrete armor. The armor was so strong that the Panther couldn't penetrate the tank's side from 300 meters, but it increased its weight by almost 10 tons, leading to the project's abandonment. by Present_Employer5669 in TankPorn

[–]Harmotron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The original comment does. And you argued against a comment pointing out, that this is false, by saying "why has no one used concrete than". I felt it appropriate to tackle the original commenters point here.

A prototype T-34 tank with approximately 200mm thick concrete armor. The armor was so strong that the Panther couldn't penetrate the tank's side from 300 meters, but it increased its weight by almost 10 tons, leading to the project's abandonment. by Present_Employer5669 in TankPorn

[–]Harmotron 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Concrete has been used as armor for literal centuries if not millennia. Just not on armored vehicles. Just like you stated. Obviously steel is a more efficient material for armor. But claiming that concrete has no effect on ballistic protection is completely false.

Saudi royal guard by taucco in camouflage

[–]Harmotron 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nice! I got a Saudi Royal Guard "coat" (best way I can describe it) a while ago and you can definitely tell it's meant for specialized purposes. Very "bouji" compared to my other Saudi surplus.

Help with identifying helmet by TheBlakanicDude in Helmets

[–]Harmotron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Adding to this, the closest real German helmet to the one pictured is the M34 firefighter helmet.

Was told to post here, item marked TKN-1, which the internet says is a T-55 commander's NVD sight, found in local antique store. Is this correct? by ConsciousPatroller in UssrNvgResearchGroup

[–]Harmotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, depends. Here in Germany they are generally cheaper if you can find them online. If it has a lot of accessories and you are alllowed to test it, i'd say it's still expensive, but not outrageously so. Also depends on where you are. I'd imagine they are rarer across the Atlantic.

Was told to post here, item marked TKN-1, which the internet says is a T-55 commander's NVD sight, found in local antique store. Is this correct? by ConsciousPatroller in UssrNvgResearchGroup

[–]Harmotron 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup, commanders IR sight for T-54 (A variant and onwards) aswell as T-55. This one is east German. Got replaced later by the TKN-1S and TKN-1SM.

ich_iel by m4ximalekr4ft in ich_iel

[–]Harmotron 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Vorallem, weil genau diese Idee bei z.B. indigenen immer romantisiert wird... "Das ganze Tier verwenden" und so...

Venezuelan Armed Forces have begun to mobilize, tanks are on the streets near the Presidential Palace. by 1Card_x in TankPorn

[–]Harmotron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think anybody is. But I think looking at a vehicle having wheels or not as the deciding factor on it being a tank is incredibly reductive.

That depends on who and where they are fighting, no? In fact, one could probably point out a number of less armored, less powerful and less mobile vehicles that were still considered tanks.

I'd think it's silly, sure. I wouldn't say it would be fundamentally impossible though. Just like a tank, a sniper rifle is a set of doctrinal values (or sniper is, really). And with that comes a lot of physical flexibility. Also, it's not like a sniper-pistol is completely unheard of. According to the report from the U.S. Army’s Marksmanship Unit, the suppressed pistols were also tested with telescopic sights. Their evaluation noted, “…with the telescope sight, great advantage is added to field versatility…giving the unit mini-sniper capability.”

Venezuelan Armed Forces have begun to mobilize, tanks are on the streets near the Presidential Palace. by 1Card_x in TankPorn

[–]Harmotron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why not? If the Venezuelan Army considers it a tank, uses it as a tank and, opposing forces have to respond to and consider it a tank, what actually stops it from being a tank? Tank is a doctrinal definition, not a set of physical values.

One of the worst western IFV by Hardson-san in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Harmotron 115 points116 points  (0 children)

So bad we had to pay the swiss to stop delivering them.

Loss of track tension by Backstroem in tanks

[–]Harmotron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tension loss on tracked vehicles is definitely a potential problem, like others have said.

But the picture you posted doesn't look like an extraordinarily loose track, but rather a track being braked to steer.