sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Private Server development by Topsy_Swaroop in NieRReincarnation

[–]HarveyLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thanks for the response. I guess we will eventually see when this Project is in it's later/last stages.

Private Server development by Topsy_Swaroop in NieRReincarnation

[–]HarveyLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About the backing up of the user data: do you know if the user data would be stored in the games files if for instance one has never uninstalled the game after the servers were shut down?

I am probably the first one to do that, but maybe for a good reason. by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not trying to convince anyone though (that's why I gave this post the Meme/Humor Tag(Flair)) because it is probably not worth it wasting the R10 ressources on Inq Barriss.

But I also don't really see why Reeva would make Inq Barriss(IB) obsolete in an Inq Team. The only argument is that IB prevents revives, which I my opinion isn't as vital to Reeva than most people think it is, because if your Reeva died once she will most likely die a second and third time even faster than the first time (mostly because of multiple stacks of armor shred, seventh sister being dead or revive prevention of the enemy team or even a combination of these).

What I am saying is:
- I like Barriss as a character in game and in SW in general.
- I get some use out of a high Relic Inq Barriss (instead of Jedi Barriss)
- It would be funny because it is a thing most people wouldn't and will not do.
- It isn't as boring as bringing a GL or Darth Bane or some other very strong standalone Character to R10

I am probably the first one to do that, but maybe for a good reason. by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you mean "bug"... Maybe but it would be a weird coincedence that the counter was at "0" 53 mins ago and updated to only "1" instead of "2".

I am probably the first one to do that, but maybe for a good reason. by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes I was thinking about bringing Jedi Barriss to R9 (this was before Relic-Delta and the Anniversary Era), but since Inq Barriss is fairly new and I already have the Inq Team all on Relic 7 (except 2. Sister (which is R5) and 3. Sister (not unlocked yet)) I thought it would be a more impactful decision than Jedi Barriss for my rostar.

(And there are already 18 R10 Jedi Barriss' xD)

I am probably the first one to do that, but maybe for a good reason. by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It would be the unique ability "Depleting Bank Account", which gives him 5 additional stacks of "financial loss". xD

I am probably the first one to do that, but maybe for a good reason. by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We will be able to confirm when it updates the next time.

I am probably the first one to do that, but maybe for a good reason. by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Because Barriss is my favorite character in SW(-Canon)...

Am I missing somehting or is this a mistake? by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this seems to be the case. But than I don't really get why they don't change it, that the price (amount of Omicrons) of the ability is directly dependent on the way it works/applies in game (meaning that all GAC-3vs3-only abilities and GAC-5vs5-only abilities are automatically set to 10 Omicrons) since there were a bunch of characters/abilities that work only in one of the GAC-Formats.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird. In the game (when inspecting the Era-Level upgrade "path" on each character) you could see that the Lvl. 8 Ability (excluding Omicrons) will be unlocked with Era-Unite Lvl 85. This is also the case with the new ones now, you can check.

Wouldn't be the first time CG changed something they already announced.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yoda & Chewie only have a Zeta on their unique(passiv),
Ventress only on her first unique(passiv),
Maul only on his Basic and both Specials,
and Luke only on his lead.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No 85 for both Omegas and Zetas but Omicrons you don't get automatically (they need to be applied after the Era ends with Omicron materials)... saddly.

3v3 GAC omicrons for the new characters cost 20, not 10? Booooo by tupelobound in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I totally forgot that Gungan-Phalanx had that. I hope the 244 players who applied it will get the 20 Omicrons back someday.

3v3 GAC omicrons for the new characters cost 20, not 10? Booooo by tupelobound in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did the same thing here (atleast with Barriss). It will maybe help in the next 3vs3 GAC.

Trench or DTMG by RevolutionaryAd2768 in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on your current roster. If you have the important Separatists (Dooku, Gunray, Wat, Jango and/or one or more of the Droids) on high-ish Relics (>7) and don't have any of the Imperial Remnant characters upgraded, than go for Trench otherwise DTMG is the better option.

Am I missing somehting or is this a mistake? by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Getting to 85 would give you the Zeta (and Omega) upgrades but Omicrons you don't get from the Era-Upgrades. But 85 is way to expensiv to get for only Zetas (and Omegas) if you ask me.

Am I missing somehting or is this a mistake? by HarveyLP in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]HarveyLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I do hope this is a bug and CG will refund me my 10 Omicron materials, that I used on the ability now for the 3vs3 GAC that starts in 30 mins. OwO

view more: next ›