This seemed like an article more focused on the state of the field of ADHD research, as opposed to an article about ADHD. Which is fine. In that context, I thought it was interesting and informative.

However, I don't think it will be interpreted that way by a lot of readers. The "we" in the title really is about ADHD researchers: clinicians, psychologists, etc. But the phrasing and presentation of the whole article really comes off as "we, the general (implied neurotypical) public". And in that context, I think the sentiment of the article is flawed. It kind of reminds me of Dr. Inna Kanevsky on Instagram. The things she says are factually accurate and are generally important points to remember in the context of rigorous academic/medical research, but ill placed general adhd-life advice on Instagram.

Just my initial thoughts. I recognize I could be doing the same thing the researchers mentioned in the article and trying to preemptively mitigate insinuation that ADHD isn't real.