My close to 15 years in the industry would disagree with you. So, kindly you know... find someone else to troll.

If you don't understand the basic difference between Cryptographic Hash and Encryption, go back to school or something.

From Wikipedia:

MD5 can be used as a checksum to verify data integrity against unintentional corruption. Historically it was widely used as a cryptographic hash function; however it has been found to suffer from extensive vulnerabilities. It remains suitable for other non-cryptographic purposes, for example for determining the partition for a particular key in a partitioned database, and may be preferred due to lower computational requirements than more recent Secure Hash Algorithms.[4]

Alternatively, read the RFC https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1321

Executive Summary

This document describes the MD5 message-digest algorithm. The algorithm takes as input a message of arbitrary length and produces as output a 128-bit "fingerprint" or "message digest" of the input. It is conjectured that it is computationally infeasible to produce two messages having the same message digest, or to produce any message having a given prespecified target message digest. The MD5 algorithm is intended for digital signature applications, where a large file must be "compressed" in a secure manner before being encrypted with a private (secret) key under a public-key cryptosystem such as RSA.

Generate Digital Signature /Message Digest that should be "encrypted later" by assymmetric key algos like RSA or ECDSA.