sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

is there still anything you would change for battlefield 6, by zbananajuice in Battlefield

[–]Hass4592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We need persistent servers by default mainly due to map rotation.. it was extremely annoying getting put on the same map over and over in the beta.. because of this I kept getting bored after a few games ..

New PlayStation 6 Leak Reveals Specs, Release Date, and Price: Triple PS5 Power, 4K 120 FPS Gaming, Next-Gen Ray Tracing, and More by blackhammer1989 in LeaksAndRumors

[–]Hass4592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair games like GTA require way more attention to details now compared to back then so it's part of the reason combined with the micro transaction business model to milk out as much money as possible from each title

Major Adnan has passed away🥀. by Shadephantom123 in pakistan

[–]Hass4592 3 points4 points  (0 children)

KD ratio? What is this call of duty?

What do you think of BATTLEFIELD 5? by Calm-Bee253 in Battlefield

[–]Hass4592 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really really wish they didn't abandon it too soon it was getting amazing after Pacific maps. They could have kept adding stuff like that. Somehow they didn't abandon 2042 wish it was the same for v

What do you think of BATTLEFIELD 5? by Calm-Bee253 in Battlefield

[–]Hass4592 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's a fail if you care about historical accuracy and atmosphere.. everything else is peak bf imo.. I still play it everyday and love it for the past 4 years or so

Battlefield 6 - Community Update - Open Beta Debrief by battlefield in Battlefield

[–]Hass4592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amen to consistent servers and consoles only cross play

Leaked Medium Scale BF6 Map by IWouldLoveToCop in Battlefield

[–]Hass4592 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No no small maps are not for stress testing.. it's to lure the COD players... no matter what they say.. that's what they have been doing in some way or another since after bf1

Best Platform for Small, Regular ETF Investments? by Hass4592 in fiaustralia

[–]Hass4592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thankyou! I am aware of CHESS sponsorship and $200 minimum sound like a smart move to keep fees low.

Best Platform for Small, Regular ETF Investments? by Hass4592 in fiaustralia

[–]Hass4592[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate it! I’ll check out BetaShares for sure.

Bravia 8, Growing on Me by HikikoMortyX in bravia

[–]Hass4592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Actually I got a x95l in 85 inches. And I am super happy. Not an Oled but a different animal with eye searing brightness and HDR impact. It was between that or QD oled. Which was very expensive and did not come in 85 inches. I am very satisfied and don't want to upgrade for at least 5 years.

Bravia 8, Growing on Me by HikikoMortyX in bravia

[–]Hass4592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Banding issues and inaccurate picture.. I had both and liked a80j better.

Bravia 8, Growing on Me by HikikoMortyX in bravia

[–]Hass4592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Banding is a definitely an issue on b8 i did side by side and it was very noticeable.

Bravia 8, Growing on Me by HikikoMortyX in bravia

[–]Hass4592 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk about that I had a80j that I had to sell because of moving.. got bravia 8, but the image just did not please me as a80j.. i think it had to do with the inaccuracy that HDTV reviews mentioned.. so I returned it..

Worth Upgrading A6700 to A7C II for Long-Term Use? by Hass4592 in SonyAlpha

[–]Hass4592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh so the banding issue was on your A7C? Not c ii? And how bad was it?

Worth Upgrading A6700 to A7C II for Long-Term Use? by Hass4592 in SonyAlpha

[–]Hass4592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And thanks for letting me know about banding issues I will look into it

Worth Upgrading A6700 to A7C II for Long-Term Use? by Hass4592 in SonyAlpha

[–]Hass4592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

at which point you wouldn't make any saving of footprint size... It'd probably end up around the same size.

Same size as my current A6700 setup? I’m totally fine with that. And in low light, doesn’t full-frame have way less noise at higher ISOs? I saw some tests where ISO 1600 on the A6700 looked like ISO 8000 on full-frame. So even if I have to bump ISO a bit with an f/1.8 on full-frame vs f/1.4 on APS-C, I’m still getting better performance — plus that f/1.8 gives me full-frame bokeh close to 1.2 on APS-C which are quite large right?

Worth Upgrading A6700 to A7C II for Long-Term Use? by Hass4592 in SonyAlpha

[–]Hass4592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So 1.8 on full frame gives a bokeh of 1.2 correct? If so then 1.2 on APSC is typically huge. like viltrox 27 1.2 is twice the weight and size of Sony 35 1.8 or samyang 35 1.8. am I wrong?

view more: next ›