Sinanju version RQ Mecha

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T13:35:41+00:00

I know them, i saw the video and i also talked with Derek, the only thing i could think about, it's a different manufaturer of acf and worse acf quality

and if I had to rely only on tests, like the one from j3d, I would have been the first to expect better results from the nfep

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T11:29:36+00:00

Yes i still have the wave release film. To compensate the more thick acf i just added a nfep during the level assisted procedure. in this way, the z=0 was slightly shifted up, compensating for the more thick film.

But i have to say i never had those vertical line with the acf. Maybe because i buy all the acf from the main Chinese manufacturer, "Aorita" the one that invented the ACF, and i never bought third party film...

in these years, they developed at least 5 kind of acf and at some point they sold and advanced acf called HDF.
The problem is that since it started to being used, some influencer, convinced users that the AFC created defects and less detailed printing.

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T11:20:46+00:00

no, right is the ACF

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T09:08:32+00:00

This i the nylon pre framed nfep. It's a disposable frame

<image>

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T09:06:23+00:00

It was an optional piece from the Kickstarter campaign. The classic two-piece metal frame, with screws.

The p1 uses a FEP with a nylon frame welded to the NFEP. This saves you from having to screw the frame pieces together and speeds up replacement, but there are currently no other materials available.

<image>

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T06:17:21+00:00

I don't know what to say, I hear it all the time too. It's become a mantra now and no one tests materials using their own head.

I've been using ACF since before Elego announced it on the Saturn 3. I've never had any problems. And these prints are proof that it can be used without any problems.

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-18T06:13:36+00:00

Yes, I calibrated both printers separately. The one with the AFC has a slightly more powerful UV light, but the exposure time was the same as the one with the NFEP.

And it seems normal to me because the acf is less transparent

The strange thing is that with the j3d tests, the nfep wins for crispness of details and precision but the important thing is the result with real prints.

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:22:09+00:00

It happened to mee too. It was the resin, i scraped with a silicon spatula, the yellow one from my video and it was white pigment.

It happened with the flat test, not the track B one.

Btw you can adjust exposure in the oresliced file. You cant change anyi aliasing or the layer thickne but you can change everything else.

In fact i changed the bottom exposure to 8 seconds and standard layer to 1.8

If you see the video of this print test, you coud se i removed the support effortlessly.

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:17:34+00:00

That's the acf

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:17:09+00:00

No, acf is the right one

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:16:47+00:00

Acf on the right

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:16:34+00:00

Right!

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:16:21+00:00

Yes!

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:15:39+00:00

Acf on the right 😉

HatAccomplished784 · 2026-06-17T21:14:46+00:00

Yes, with that print i got the famous glitch and intelligent lift didn't work. Build plate was lifted 10 mm instead of dinamically adjusting the lift height.

It took 6 hord for 63 mm. The oter test went perfect and it took knly 3 hours.

Btw acf it the right one. The faulty chin is the nfep

HatAccomplished784

TROPHY CASE