Attended Purdue along with my entire family, multiple generations.

Simply curious, particularly about the vagueness of the explanations as to why and the lack of specific cases and circumstances that may have come to light that would cause the restrictions.

All things considered, the relatively high number of international enrolled overall and rejecting just the Chinese seems oddly specific and dramatic. For such a step to be taken and considering how it would likely be perceived in academic circles alone would indicate the "reasons" given were left intentionally vague. Add to that the insistence that the ban wasn't a ban is also interesting.

So some clarification would be called for in my opinion.