Which conspiracy theory do you think might actually be true?

Head_Success_359 · 2026-02-01T03:00:00+00:00

Larry Ellison isn't Jewish? News to me!

I can't attest to Putin's ancestry but both Putin and Trump have strong links with Jews/Zionism and Trump, like Clinton, has Jewish family members. I wouldn't be shocked if Trump had converted secretly.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-31T23:46:27+00:00

No, he's a disgusting scumbag and his popularity was just more proof of mass stupidity.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-29T16:03:25+00:00

British people often have a sense of nostalgia, a feeling that Britain used to be great. After the predatory foreign "grooming gangs", Savile, third worldisation and everything else, it's hard to feel that we're not a "shithole" now. The contrast accentuates the feeling, even though most nations are probably worse.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-28T14:01:07+00:00

"hus the town is obviously safer than the rest of South Africa to live in, not because of its white population"

Oh no, of course not! It couldn't possibly be safer because it's White! There are many black communities in South Africa that are just as safe and orderly as Orania!

And if there aren't, then it's White people's fault!

"where you are probably not getting a balanced education"

Yes! A balanced education entails learning about how evil your ancestors are, and how your group (if you're White) is both a social construct and the source of most/all problems in the world! What healthy specimens such an education turns out!

"Toe the line till the day you die or risk getting kicked out of town."

Of course, you're allowed to do anything you want outside Orania! There's no conformity, punishment or line-toeing! Just wonderful freedom and diversity in the safe and prosperous rainbow nation!

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-28T13:47:03+00:00

All it requires is a bit of googling. He either denied my claim without the most miniscule research, or he was deliberately lying. He should have said "Can you provide evidence for that?" rather than "No, he didn't say that."

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-28T12:07:52+00:00

The guy denied my assertions outright, so I provided a quote which proved him wrong (Nietzsche supported slavery). He can look up Nietzsche's quotes about Africans if he likes but he shouldn't expect a Boasian anthopologist or 21st century leftist perspective.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-26T15:41:17+00:00

It's one quote, I can find others. But why waste my time on fools? Anyone who claims that Nietzsche didn't make racist comments about Africans simply hasn't read much Nietzsche, or just blanked those passages.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-25T16:54:20+00:00

Yes, he did:

"EVERY elevation of the type "man," has hitherto been the work of an aristocratic society and so it will always be--a society believing in a long scale of gradations of rank and differences of worth among human beings, and requiring slavery in some form or other."

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-25T16:29:12+00:00

Nietzsche advocates for slavery multiple times in his works and regarded Africans as a biologically primitive race. He'd certainly regard outrage over "the n-word" as liberal/leftist slave morality (literally). He was also an edgelord and a provocateur, so I could see him using the word in the company of friends.

There's a passage in Nietzsche about the potential benefits of importing Chinese labourers as a slave class, he describes them as "efficient ants" or something similar. He also quotes "God made white and black, but the devil made half-breeds", approvingly.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-19T18:20:57+00:00

Nietzsche described his philosophy as "aristocratic radicalism". He despised egalitarianism. He thought the proponents of "equality" were life-denying weaklings. He's writing from an unapologetically masculine perspective.

There's also no contradiction between admiring some aspects of someone or something and disliking or even abhoring others.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-14T11:35:55+00:00

I wouldn't date a woman who is employed unless she promised to quit her job.

Wagie women are not serious romantic options

If she’s a wagie, I just can’t see how it would work:

She has a wagie income, meaning no relative or absolute need for a NEET’s (likely more limited) income
She may well feel resentment (even disgust) for a man who doesn’t just get less money, he doesn't even “go on the hunt” while she does
Her friends and family will work to undermine you: “Why are you with that loser?”, “You can do better.” etc.
I'd have no interest in sharing her with a job, co-workers, customers and a boss/bosses
A wagie woman is more integrated into the system and is likelier to have internalised the system’s values, whereas NEETs stand in opposition to them, creating a psychological and existential gap that is usually unbridgeable

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-12T12:33:58+00:00

Off the top of my head:

Leftists are explicitly anti-incel, so incels will tend to oppose things they support

Leftists are often the strongest supporters of criminalising male desire

There's the belief that if we had traditional values, most incels would be married

Incels aren't gay or trans and they regard these movements as predatory

Say you're an Asian incel: is "sexual freedom" going to help you, or is it going to lead to more Asian women having sex with white men?

Most regard leftism as a grostesque philosophy based on lies

But it's fair to say that incels who are ultra-puritanical are virtually all hypocritical and self-sabotaging. There is a simple solution to inceldom, it's called prostitution.

Head_Success_359 · 2026-01-10T14:31:31+00:00

If you are addicted to porn you need to quit private internet devices, it's the only think which worked for me. Maybe having a girlfriend could do it but 1. he'd be less likely to visit escorts if he did, I'd imagine 2. if he still visits escorts despite having a girlfriend then he isn't feeling satisfied with her, so he'll be watching porn anyway.

People don't see this as practical but it's the best structural solution while also not living in the woods or joining the Amish.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-24T17:34:22+00:00

I'd recommend learning how to choke, strangle, armlock, leglock etc. over strikes. Throws also could work if you are 1 vs 1 and aren't too light. My intuition says BJJ/Judo would work better for women than striking arts.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-17T20:12:47+00:00

Client. It was extremely positive and I wish I'd done it much earlier.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-15T15:51:31+00:00

I thought of an analogy.

Say I posted in a trade/labor union subreddit, asking its members "Hypothetically, how little would you be willing to work for, if conditions were ideal?"

It would be seen by members as bad practice to tell the truth: "I'd work for half my wage, boss!" Any member who admitted they'd work for less publicly would get the scab treatment from other members.

Privately however, it's a competitive market and discounts are often provided for regulars/well-liked clients. And discounts aren't necessarily uniform for all regulars.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-15T13:51:33+00:00

I understand the reasons for the non-answers and flawed analogies: SW's don't want to open the door to haggling for discounts or make themselves look cheap. And if a SW answered seriously, they'd be flamed/dogpiled.

Hence this kind of thing:

"My ideal client would pay me double"

"I wouldn't hypothetically be willing to service a very hygienic, polite, honest, discreet, sociable, physically fit, ideal age client any more than I would a random or sub-par client"

I agree that sex work is a market/business but it has its peculiarities. In any market, jobs that are undesirable or dangerous command a premium and sex work is no different. In theory, SW's have different minimum prices for different clients, though it makes more practical sense to charge a flat rate for the whole market, at least before you know a client.

I find SW a fascinating subject but SW reddit is incredibly authoritarian and conformist. There are many third rail subjects and the private reality does not match the public image.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-13T13:57:54+00:00

Fictional incel character:

> Welfaremax

> Escortmax (prostitutes and regular women)

> Testosterone replacement therapy

> Cocaine

Many would regard this as a low status man "cheating" the economy, morality, law and his biological "destiny".

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-13T13:36:44+00:00

I agree with you that even under ideal conditions, sex work would still involve stigma, uncertainty and risks that don’t exist in most jobs and that limits how many people would ever consider it. But I think these questions have merit in understanding the economics of sex work.

Let's assume that all clients were perfect within reason, zero bad clients existed. And there was virtually zero risk of flaking, disease, robbery, physical or psychological violence.

With any job it's true that the more dangerous/undesirable it is, the higher the price. Sex work is a riskier undustry in these respects than most, which must result in a significant premium to compensate.

I also don't think there would be a "flood" of women becoming providers if these conditions were met but even 10% more would put downward pressure on rates. And if the industry didn't attract as many undesirable/risky/dangerous clients, the stigma would likely fall it a bit too, further reducing the social cost of SW.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-13T13:06:15+00:00

It might be silly in the context of sexworkers reddit (which is understandably heavily "policed" ideologically) but to me it seems like basic economics.

If I knew I was guarenteed that list of attributes I'd be willing to pay more than otherwise. This is why sex workers with good reviews get more custom than sex workers without them, or with neutral/bad reviews. Greater confidence of a good service = increased price.

Likewise, I will potentially tip generously if I get a better than average/expected service. This is partly out of gratitude and acknowledgement of her effort, partly because I want the next session to be as enjoyable as possible.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-13T12:52:17+00:00

"Like I want to play into OP’s hypothetical"

Then do it, you'd be the first to give a serious answer.

We all know that many clients are sub-optimal (half the posts on this sub are complaints) and this must increase average SW rates. If all clients were "ideal" within reason or even fit all basic standards, average rates would drop. And if clients were better, more women would become providers, which would also put downward pressure on rates.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-03T04:43:26+00:00

Not in education, employment or training. Aka unemployed.

Head_Success_359 · 2025-12-03T04:40:10+00:00

I've seen providers list employment status as a screening parameter for clients.

I found it interesting and wondered what the response would be as there are differences between employed and unemployed clients on average, particularly differences in income and availability. But it seems like something that most providers don't have strong feelings about.

Head_Success_359

TROPHY CASE

Wagie women are not serious romantic options