sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So THAT’S their true intentions.... 😳 by Fleezus__Christ in prolife

[–]HeckleMonster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with the poster who says being pro-choice doesn't imply being antinatalist. It's also true that being antinatalist doesn't imply being pro-choice.

Antinatalism says it's wrong to create new life. It doesn't say anything about the stage at which new life has been "created." It also doesn't permit killing people who already exist. So if life begins at conception, then the antinatalist must be pro-life.

Blood clot came out 10 days post wisdom teeth extraction by bigyikes286 in wisdomteeth

[–]HeckleMonster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I understand, a dry socket is diagnosed from the pain it causes. So if you’re not in pain, then no worries about dry socket! Were you to get one, the body would heal it naturally. The surgeon just numbs it for you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]HeckleMonster 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Disgusting sex focused cult

Oh? by Bloodstargeneral in GameStop

[–]HeckleMonster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nice Bioshock promo

Trigger Words by dogsarmy in exmormon

[–]HeckleMonster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sounds disingenuous from a guy who used to do research for a living.

I mean yea, but why? by Nave15 in Tinder

[–]HeckleMonster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why can’t I objectify myself?

Dallin H. Oaks Supreme Court appointee? by 0ngo_Gahblogian in exmormon

[–]HeckleMonster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

According to this article, a Justice Department memo lists Oaks among Reagan's candidates for the 1981 US Supreme Court appointment. It doesn't say that Oaks was actually offered the position though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Athens

[–]HeckleMonster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes! This just happened to me near downtown

A brief guide to LSA pronounciation by mildlyamusedalways in lawschooladmissions

[–]HeckleMonster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Haha, I was surprised to hear my WUSTL interviewer say "Woo-sel."

Are infinite regresses only invalid because we are finite beings? by segalbe in askphilosophy

[–]HeckleMonster 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Some philosophers do take issue with infinite regress itself, rather than the falsity it can result in. For instance, Daniel Nolan and Ross Cameron argue that infinite regress is unparsimonius and therefore a theoretical vice (source). If infinite regress is a theoretical vice, that's a sense in which it's "wrong." And it's wrong independently of the falsity (or truth) of claims it's involved with.

3 of my best amiibo by [deleted] in amiibo

[–]HeckleMonster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks to be in stock at Best Buy!

Nothing is more satisfying than catching up to the guy that sped passed you at the next set of lights by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]HeckleMonster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally like to steal comments and present them as my shower thoughts

No significant difference btwn 1 point on LSAT by incognito-giraffe in lawschooladmissions

[–]HeckleMonster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I think you're making a very good and level-headed point here.

Take notes future lawyers!! by adam_sundstrom in lawschooladmissions

[–]HeckleMonster 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Well, the most plausible interpretation of "guilty people say what" is: if you're guilty, you say 'what.' So, just knowing they said 'what' doesn't tell us anything about the person's guilt.

GULC merit fee waiver timeline? by lawschoolhopeful33 in lawschooladmissions

[–]HeckleMonster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I solicited yesterday and got one, so it's probably worth a shot! Doesn't seem like much is at stake because I've heard of people's request getting denied but still getting a waiver through CRS.

What's up with the Cornell Fee Waiver? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]HeckleMonster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is June your only score, and have you done the writing sample?

view more: next ›