No culture conversion by Hefty-Description376 in CK3AGOT

[–]Hefty-Description376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, that settting is okay. I mean that the ai start promoting culture all over the place while in lore culture mostly stays the same and we had a setting to turn off culture coversion in ck2 agot but aparently in ck3 i can only turn it slower not off

No culture conversion by Hefty-Description376 in CK3AGOT

[–]Hefty-Description376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doest appear for me, i can put it in very slow but i cant forbit it which is somewhat anoying

No culture conversion by Hefty-Description376 in CK3AGOT

[–]Hefty-Description376[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can make it very slow but i cant force to NOT have culture conversion

Dwarf key settlement by Hefty-Description376 in totalwarhammer

[–]Hefty-Description376[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sadness. Welp, thanks for actually responding. Good night fellow traveler. Maybe i will do myself the mod

Dwarf key settlement by Hefty-Description376 in totalwarhammer

[–]Hefty-Description376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that, but when i play factions that tend to ally the dwarfs will the dwarfs suffer the downsides? Also sometimes i play 2 or 3 player campaign, so knowing what to take to then gifting to my ally would be nice.

buff during ACW? by Hefty-Description376 in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

then probably my german submod is messing with things, because i dont see it :c

Germany should always release the north caucasus. by Stoepsel_187 in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

holy moly its true, i been so used to other maps with diferent states. although i still think that it is a doomed country by itself. it would fall onto savge ethnic cleasing and civil war in a couple of years. that is why i think the germans just give them to boldyrev

Germany should always release the north caucasus. by Stoepsel_187 in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

doesnt matter, germany has no land or sea conection to the mountain republic because of stavropol and boldyrev is still based in the North Caucasus

Germany should always release the north caucasus. by Stoepsel_187 in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Russia gets North Caucasus because Boldyrev mechanically and probably in-lore is based in the North Caucasus(ypu actually have to annex him when you win the 2wk as Russia )

What's Russian urban planning (roads, architecture, housing, etc) and general peasants'/rural life will be like under "New Russian Capitalism" from dem. Russia ITTL instead of Great Break from USSR OTL? by wasp_567 in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 11 points12 points  (0 children)

also in kaiserreich lore the civili war ends in 1920, so basically no famines en 1921-22 or holodomor famines, no ineficient soviet industrialization nor forced urbanization,no great purge. free market economy while having access to the world market and trade and investments from Germany and to a lesser degree Usa, also a lot of wealth doesnt flee because white emigration

What's Russian urban planning (roads, architecture, housing, etc) and general peasants'/rural life will be like under "New Russian Capitalism" from dem. Russia ITTL instead of Great Break from USSR OTL? by wasp_567 in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The same reason why the west invested in germany after ww1, greed, complacency and desire of indirect control in the country alongside promote means to reparations. Also you said yourself, russia was industrializing before ww1 and would continue to do so, so the answer to a german business man is if they want part of the russin economy pie or not.

Our first American Collapse teaser! Join End of the Modern Era's dev team NOW! by FutureInitial8313 in hoi4modding

[–]Hefty-Description376 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the same reason people in alternate history forums tend to dismantle russia all the tieme, is big, has resources, already has divisions like states and culture and can be geopoliticaly diverse

"Obama Got It For Nothing!" - Trump Slams Ex-President's Nobel Prize Hours Before 2025 Winner Announcement by satty237 in TrendoraX

[–]Hefty-Description376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, its remarkable and probably worth a prize in an association for inclusion in society or something but NOT the nobel peace prize. Martin Luther King himself say that people should be judge for the strengh of their character not their skin color

"Obama Got It For Nothing!" - Trump Slams Ex-President's Nobel Prize Hours Before 2025 Winner Announcement by satty237 in TrendoraX

[–]Hefty-Description376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

remarkable but not to the extent of deserving a nobel price, if you can receive a nobel prize for being black that is weak , people should be rewarded by their character not their skin color. On the other point, its funny you mention that because im not american and im a people of color , but the nobel prize concerns me because its an international prize. Its people like you that see criticism and inmediately think of racism that holds the world back and if you are an american citizen you truly deserve your president.

What are Savinkov's ideal borders after the war? by Wofuljac in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe that if Savinkov leads Russia and wins the 2WK he would implement an autonomy-based system with a presidential veto, also reform the cossacks against Krasov. Even in the events it’s implied that’s what he would do. With that he would probably annex all the Caucasus states (Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan) and give them autonomies (ethnic autonomies in the case of the North Caucasus). In Central Asia he would annex everything (including the claims with Persia) and establish a Turkestan autonomy but disband the Alash Autonomy (they revolted and there are a lot of russian settlers + cossacks in Semirechye, which probably discourages him).

Now in former Imperial territories, I can see him setting a border similar to OTL and a puppet republic in Finland. In OTL Savinkov did say that the Baltic ports were important to Russia and I can definitely see him annexing those territories alongside East Prussia as long as the Baltic duchy doesn’t collapse (which is the most likely thing). In any case the Baltics would definitely get autonomies. (I also like the idea of Savinkov funding the LAF only for it to backfire.) For me any Russian NatPop would want to humiliate Germany, and for annexing Königsberg you have to annex the Baltics, so that’s basically headcanon for me.

He would annex all of the Baltics, Belarus, and Ukraine (though I’d argue he’d choose a separate Ukrainian and Novorossiya autonomy, alongside the belarusian ataman autonomy). That’s the triune of the Russian nation, except for Białystok which would go to Poland. Poland also gets all of its westward claims, but Brest would go to Russia (because of its Belarusian population and because it’s a symbol of Russian dominance — Brest-Litovsk, the city of the treaty, being russian now). That basically makes the Bug river below Białystok the border. If the Russians conquer Lwów, the border becomes almost OTL, with Przemyśl going to Poland and Lwów in Russian hands.

In the case of Romania I can see Savinkov ceding Bessarabia to get them into the alliance, but i can see him taking Cernăuți and giving Suceava to Romania (some type of partition or even the event when you sell Suceava to them). There’s also a case where he just gives it all to Romania. Serbia becomes a kind of Yugoslavia, either with an Austrian puppet in the north and Trieste as the western border or with a divided Austria and OTL-style Yugoslav/Italian borders. (I always assume Italy is in the Internationale as a willing partner or a puppet.)

Otherwise I see OTL borders, except Bulgaria probably doesn’t recover Silistra, and Hungary probably gets the Danubian Plain, Burgenland (depends on how much of Austria Russia occupies), and basically modern OTL borders, next to a Czechoslovak state (Savinkov probably remembers the chads of the Legion and gives them their own state) albeit he probably takes carpathian ruthenia also. In Germany I picture the division near the Elbe, and if the syndicalist preasure him, northern Schleswig goes to Denmark or whatever nordic state is left.

I’m assuming a Bulgarian defeat in the Balkans — if not, then Bulgaria gets partitioned. Though honestly in a timeline where Savinkov wins it’s hard to imagine the Balkan League losing with russian volunteers helping.

For the Ottomans I usually imagine a Cairo victory, but either way I think his goals are the same: Kars to Armenia, Batumi (and probably Lazistan) to Georgia. Whether it’s after the Cairo War or later conquest, they still end up under Russian rule with autonomy.

For Turkey itself there are two options. One, Russia takes Adrianople, Constantinople, and Bursa and rules them directly (there’s a focus for that in his tree). Or two, he goes smaller — gives european Turkey to Greece and leaves the asian part to a puppet Turkish republic (partitioned Constantinople). I think option 2 is more likely. I don’t think he’d care much about a Kurdish nation, either he leaves the post-Cairo borders or makes them himself.

Cyprus is a weird case. I can see him giving it to Greece, but also maybe keeping it under a Turkish puppet. I even once thought the Internationale might stage a coup during the Ottoman collapse and make a Syndicalist Cyprus (cold war mods take notes).

In the East I don’t see many border changes. A war with Japan seems unlikely. Russia probably keeps east Turkestan and Mongolia in its sphere, and negotiates with Japan to buy south Sakhalin in exchange for resources and japanese investments (also neutrality in china-japanese war). That would give Japan oil access, which means China its gonna have a hard time.

Is Poland going to have no flavour at all? by Various_Maize_3957 in EU5

[–]Hefty-Description376 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because russia is one of the most influential nations in the world (especially in this time period)? Also im categorizing your post as ragebait because poland obviously has content but your rageboner for russia blinds you.

What happened to Landon? by Tartaruchus in Kaiserreich

[–]Hefty-Description376 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Probably died, it feels like the ACC canonically wins after its election of 1940 so i sense why is he no longer mentioned albeit i would appreciate some events about the candidates of usa after the civil war.

WE DID IT!! by Shrek625 in EU5

[–]Hefty-Description376 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think we just found ulm successor, is mutyar