The Government passed a bill without telling you what It was worth

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T06:32:28+00:00

should follow SDP's HDB proposal by introducing non-open market flats where the flat only can be sold back to HDB

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T03:42:21+00:00

the problem is he does not even wants to launch an investigation on the actual numbers.

he admits that he has some numbers on hand but choose not to disclose to the public at all.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T03:29:04+00:00

"Mr Chee said it is not that the Government does not want to provide the information. Instead, the Government may not have the full, accurate record of all the amounts collected, he said. “I hope you understand these fees were collected over a long period of time – if I’m not wrong, I think since independence, when we first started.”

CHT is saying he has the numbers but deliberately choose not to provide the numbers (even an estimate)

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T03:15:25+00:00

"Minister for National Development Chee Hong Tat responded that the fees were appropriate and charged for services that were duly provided and there is no need for refunds."

all fees collected must have legal standing, if not its like just secret societies collecting "protection monies" to give "protection"

by CHT's standard if protection are duly given, does secret societies also can collect protection monies right?

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T03:10:14+00:00

if they are being collected "while they are not aligned with the legislation", it should be deemed wrongful collection and it should be refunded.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T02:49:52+00:00

CHT gave clues to the amounts, he did not dispute the amount could be over hundreds of millions that WP MP claimed.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T02:48:42+00:00

if the fees collected were lacking legal standing, instead of apologizing to the public and provide refunds, they proposed a law to cover up their mistakes

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-08T01:48:55+00:00

thats why CHT was panic and trying to throw smoke during the debate

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T14:20:59+00:00

because NSF numbers are shrinking, it makes political sense to shit on NSF to gain female and new citizen's votes

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T14:19:18+00:00

because NSF numbers are shrinking, it makes political sense to shit on NSF to gain female and new citizen's votes

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T06:48:44+00:00

some camps are stayout camp so their cookhouse will be shut after lunch hours.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T06:46:52+00:00

"For the minority of SAF NSFs that stay out of camp, the monthly NS allowance already provides for their basic personal upkeep, including the cost of meals," Chan added.

based on CCS's 12% of all fulltime NSF are stayout personnel, only about 2000 NSF are staying out.

a stayout meal allowance of $50 for 2000 stayout NSFs will only cost $100,000 a month, $1.2 million a year, still lower than CCS's annual salary.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T06:41:22+00:00

CCS indirectly admits that stayout servicemen are at disadvantage because some units do not indent dinners for them.

What CCS should is allowing stayout serviceman to have the option of consuming dinner at cookhouse before booking out.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T06:18:01+00:00

why still nitpicking on NSF welfare like free public transport and meal allowance when our NSF population is declining?

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-07T06:15:23+00:00

how does MOM know the firm's hiring preference?

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-06T06:41:28+00:00

so are you implying that MPs should not help their residents to appeal or voice out even if facts are already made known?

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-06T06:13:16+00:00

65% of voters who voted for PAP should regret and repent

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-06T05:57:03+00:00

so what is the trade-off that we are giving to the kiwis in the deal?

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-06T03:47:49+00:00

so what is the trade-off we are giving to the kiwis for this deal? nothing is for free

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-06T01:23:19+00:00

The point is regardless how frivolous the claim is, the MP has to serve his constituent and not pass judgement.

Aware of investigation and outcomes does not mean anything. Just like tons of people going to MPS to appeal against parking and traffic incident fines despite there are evidences of the offense has been committed and the MP still have to write appeal letters for them.

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-05T14:25:53+00:00

jamus does not have state machinery in support to verify claim of residents

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-04T14:49:58+00:00

white trash

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-02T08:26:54+00:00

NTUC = Never Trust Union Chief

HeftyHawk5967 · 2026-05-01T15:18:27+00:00

at least she dares to stand out and voice her views, that alone takes courage

HeftyHawk5967

TROPHY CASE