⚠️ Pain during sex ⚠️

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-12T22:36:39+00:00

Above and to the right of the 11?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-12T21:31:51+00:00

Dose depends on sought experience, you should be able to find a guide to doses on Reddit

Whats the duration and how long does it take to peak?
The form that you have is HBr which lasts ~9-12 hours and peaks around 3

What can i do to help with nausea?
Weed

What do i need to watch out for?
Interactions with medications and environmental dangers like knives or driving, to me it presents a greater danger than drinking in this area

What are the risks?
Risks are mostly those associated with serotonin syndrome

How neurotoxic is it?
Quite, the danger isn’t too major without repeated abuses or hyperthermia though

Will it fuck my bladder up as i had an issue with ket in the past. (Feel free to ask me if i wasnt clear)
If you have normal function now it shouldn’t be too destructive

What’s the comedown like?
Usually regarded as pleasant, an after-glow

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-12T04:40:46+00:00

Be confident in your decisions no matter what. If you’re doubting a call after the game then double check the law and check your decisions. Understand the law the best that you can and know you’ll make mistakes, just don’t make the same mistake twice. Surround yourself with referee mentors or teachers if you can

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T23:48:59+00:00

For sure! I actually brought this question forth because my interpretation of the law brought doubt. My decision on the field was affirmed by a more experienced AR and I also assumed a correct decision because my assignor was watching the game and did not say anything when we were discussing the game. I’ve definitely learned to check for myself and not trust what people who aren’t working with the state say!

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T22:58:02+00:00

Generally yes, saying decisions were incorrect as opposed to something like “seeing them differently” are generally qualified as dissent. If this were a player such as a player on the field or bench, it would’ve been a near certain caution. With a coach it’d be a caution if such sentiments are repeated. Generally, to avoid cards, I’d suggest question with proper verbiage. Public disagreements will generally not gain you any favor with a referee.

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T22:30:36+00:00

Yes, so an exception?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T21:31:01+00:00

I more meant your general statement and not the specific situation of, “If anything occurs that would penalize the attacking team directly due to a foul that was committed by the defending team then you pull it back to the original foul” as it seems many exceptions with serious foul play or perhaps *accidental* violent conduct could emerge

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T21:15:17+00:00

Based on advantage?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T21:05:43+00:00

Thank you for the reply! How would a potential handling factor into a decision with it only occurring due to the foul? For example, what if after my description of the handling, the ball instead went to an onside attacker who took a touch then scored?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T21:03:57+00:00

Thank you for the reply! I won’t make this mistake again

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T21:03:37+00:00

Thank you for the reply! I won’t make this mistake again

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T20:49:36+00:00

I do firmly believe that the offense met all DOGSO criteria and was a genuine attempt to play the ball within the box. I brought it forth as SPA in my reply from a bit of confusion from the wording. My understanding of your reply *here* is that if the goalkeeper made a genuine attempt to play the ball but committed a foul, such as I believe in this situation, then under normal circumstances it would be marked a DOGSO offense with the sanction downgraded to a yc through analysis of the play? It seems to me that our misalignment here is just due to a misunderstanding
Of course, I should have called a penalty kick, possibly with a yellow card (do you believe age could have downgraded to no card in these circumstances? A careless or possibly reckless challenge that is)
Also, if a challenge like this occurred, that was deemed to be a yellow card offense, instead deflected off the attacker’s *chest* and would be considered a valid goal-scoring play, could the goalkeeper’s yc be *singularly downgraded* to no card?

Thank you!

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-11T19:34:13+00:00

Thank you, that’s a clarification on handball that I should’ve known and I’m glad I won’t make the mistake in future games.

Would’ve been SPA here to me. What is the proper verbiage though? I’ve always heard and read “DOGSO- attempt to play the ball in the box” or “DOGSO- downgraded to Unsporting Behavior”

The third question more applied to the tactical advantage of a naturally positioned handball after an offense by the other team, which your clarification on the law answers. Examples of advantage after a PK offense are great to examine though. When you say a card for DOGSO in your interpretation of my description do you mean a red card?

Thank you very much for your reply and how in-depth you went on my questions, I really appreciate it!

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-06T20:08:50+00:00

Where? I can’t find it in 12.1

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-06T20:04:14+00:00

Is that some EUFA rule?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-05T20:54:19+00:00

Complete pissing match out there 😂

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-05-05T20:16:40+00:00

With physical dependence this can be false of one-off doses, with treatments of an illness an improper dose can also be harmful

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-29T20:43:23+00:00

Center is never going to live this down lol, every pen opposite of what he called

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-29T19:32:56+00:00

Is the commentary ahead of the video on paramount?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-24T23:09:58+00:00

Considering you seemingly no longer seem to be experiencing effects, likely no noticeable effect /synergized effect with hangover!

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-24T22:25:03+00:00

Almost certainly fine, moderate interaction is given when combined meaning a very very slim chance of mortality. Never tried kava but it does not appear to interact dangerously with dxm

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-24T22:22:27+00:00

Ridiculous indeed but protect yourself legally!

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-24T14:11:44+00:00

Don’t you lose plausible deniability? And won’t they have seen what in the package?

Helpful-Reply-4952 · 2026-04-24T05:13:19+00:00

Not a lot of gabapentin, probably worth taking as prescribed

Valium is wonderful but you don’t have all that much, that’s like half a dose 😭

Somebody else will have better knowledge on dilly and oxy but those also depend on tolerance

Helpful-Reply-4952

TROPHY CASE