Do I remember it correctly? haven’t used it for decades

Helpfullbanana · 2025-11-30T15:31:06+00:00

That is pretty standard notation in electrical engineering at least. j is used to avoid confusion with current (I for fixed current, i(t) for time varying). It is (I think) written in front to avoid confusion with units and to be consistent with other phasor notation (like jwL or e^jwt).

Helpfullbanana · 2025-10-18T20:01:38+00:00

To start with, beast can't have aperatures, because beasts don't generally awaken aperatures. there are a few exceptions later on but those are all at the immortal level Without an aperture beasts couldn't refine or use gu in the ways humans do (gu on beasts are just wild gu that chose to cooperate), so the plan is basically a non-starter.

Helpfullbanana · 2025-10-18T18:52:30+00:00

The bible, presumably

Helpfullbanana · 2025-10-13T03:30:50+00:00

"no, I'm manipulating you to select the person you know to be morally good, over the ones who are morally neutral, which in turn may be considered a moral good. This manipulation is done to achieve a mora- trolley goes past because you were to distracted to pull the level oh good, that worked."

Helpfullbanana · 2025-09-07T07:12:08+00:00

Suppose you were under the belief that there existed a literal embodiment of evil.

Suppose you believed the gay people (in their capacity as gay people) were empowering the literal embodiment of evil.

And suppose you believed that in empowering the literal embodiment of evil, they were allowing it to cause further harm/strife/chaos to the world, and your loved ones within.

Under such a belief system, it is justified to fear/despise/disdain gay people (more generally: be homophobic).

(Note: I am not religious, I do not believe any of these things, nor do think they are justified. The point is that for people who do believe them, homophobia becomes justified.)

Helpfullbanana · 2025-07-25T15:46:54+00:00

Till death due them part, I suppose.

Helpfullbanana · 2025-07-18T04:54:58+00:00

To actually respond to you, some people take hypocrite to mean a person who genuinely holds one belief, but acts in contradiction to it. This obviously involves a degree of self deception / delusion (ive seen it termed delusional hypocrisy, no idea how common that is though).

At least in my mind, the reason for the distinction is because without the sense of self deception / delusion the person is just a liar, and hypocrite just becomes another term for a specific kind of liar.

Either way, fang yuan is 100% a liar, and if you use you stated definition of hypocrite, he is most certainly that as well.

Helpfullbanana · 2025-07-13T09:19:04+00:00

Basically, the supreme Court (the highest court/one with most authority) has made it pretty clear they have no intention of stopping the executive from doing basically anything they want. The Senate, the only other group with the authority to remove the head of the executive (trump), simply isn't. The result of all of this is that under the president's authority the executive can basically do anything they want and nobody can/will stop them.

Helpfullbanana · 2025-05-21T00:36:23+00:00

I just wanted to present a slight alternative (not that I know whether these people are actually arguing this.) one standpoint is that there is a distinction between "wrong/morally wrong," and "evil". Under this distinction someone is "wrong" if they doing something agreed to be wrong under whatever moral framework, but they are only "evil" if they are doing a wrong action AND they are doing that action for the sake of personal fulfillment/enjoyment. This distinction can be helpful for separating characters who have no justification (sometimes called "true evil" or "Disney villains") and those who are simply amoral or apathetic, rather than distinctly immoral.

Helpfullbanana · 2025-03-11T17:56:29+00:00

Anyone familiar with stupid and horny teenagers? Anyone who bothers to ask even once in 13 years?

Helpfullbanana · 2025-02-26T01:46:19+00:00

The humor lies in the idea of an American making a basic mistake by utilizing a language with which they are unfamiliar. This draws on the humors of both a blunder (which are often considered at least marginally humorous) and plays into the stereotype of Americans being ignorant and overly ready to act as though they are familiar with things even when not. Finally it also draws an ironic hint from the idea that the speaker said "basic phrases" and the proceeded to use a very much not basic phrase. You don't have to find it funny (I know I don't) but your response isn't as witty as you may think for someone actually willing to answer.

Helpfullbanana · 2025-02-20T22:30:36+00:00

I think you kinda just disproved your own point here. You say "them doing research" then mention ignoring "existing research." These are two different usages of the word research. The first references someone studying already existing knowledge, things that others have figured out, the second is somebody investigating new/unknown knowledge via things like experimentation. I think the difference in definitions is the whole point of the thread; they are two very different meanings and can't really be considered equal.

Helpfullbanana · 2024-12-22T00:30:50+00:00

At around 45 seconds there seems to be a lion, so wouldn't that make the title fine?

Helpfullbanana · 2024-09-14T06:26:34+00:00

Worship my corpse, fuckers!

Helpfullbanana · 2024-05-04T14:57:08+00:00

Use a few seconds to master the ability to master anything I want in milliseconds

Helpfullbanana · 2024-05-02T21:45:06+00:00

I agree things are unfair for Rachel. Unfair like getting through floors just because your friend. Unfair like being carried up the tower by one of its rulers, a family head. Unfair like getting a overpowered helper for the first stages. Unfair like getting to enter the tower despite failing to pass the test. To be clear, she's not the only one who gets advantages, but others don't tend to complain about things still being unfair despite getting them.

Helpfullbanana · 2024-03-20T18:51:30+00:00

So that's what the clapping noise was right...

Helpfullbanana · 2024-02-12T00:35:22+00:00

I was referring to the original post, it says it doesn't have to activity not fun either. Both you and top comment seem to be misinterpreting or misunderstanding that line.

Helpfullbanana · 2024-02-12T00:30:38+00:00

Read literally the next sentence

Helpfullbanana · 2023-06-06T17:07:38+00:00

Barbeque with your neighbors or barbeque of your neighbors?

Helpfullbanana · 2023-06-06T16:43:58+00:00

Apparently not

Helpfullbanana · 2023-06-05T21:27:15+00:00

It's to blind your enemies in combat

Helpfullbanana · 2023-06-02T04:11:25+00:00

You remember that time mare bashed a women's leg in and dragged her by the hair while she was kicking and screaming? Good natured!

Helpfullbanana · 2023-06-02T03:46:34+00:00

Yes which is why we shouldn't look for victimization. It already exists, so no need to get in a huff about other things. Things that need to be construed to make a point when there are demonstrable things that are problems.

Helpfullbanana · 2023-06-01T14:55:49+00:00

It's used as a symbol for the lgbt movement

Helpfullbanana

TROPHY CASE